Murni Mahmud(1*), Sahril Nur(2),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v2i1.4346


The main objective of this paper is to explore the learning strategies of male and female students and to discuss those strategies in relation to gender differences. This research was conducted in one senior high school in Makassar, Indonesia. The number of respondents was 71 students taken randomly by using Slovin formula among 250 students. The study used quantitative and qualitative data. The quantitative data were collected by using a questionnaire of SILL whereas the qualitative data were taken by using interview. The learning strategies were discussed based on Oxford’s learning strategies (1990) whereas the notion of gender differences in relation to learning strategies was discussed in the framework of gender differences in communication proposed by Lakoff (1975, 1976) and (Tannen, 1990, 1994). Findings from the questionnaire show that female students use cognitive, compensation, and affective strategy more often compared to male students while male students use memory, metacognitive, and social strategy more often compared to female students. Findings from the interview show that female and male students chose different learning strategies. In addition, those learning strategies were influenced by the notion of gender differences in communication. These findings significantly give beneficial inputs to the process of English language teaching in order to create effective teaching and classroom interaction. It also provides significant contribution to the study on language and gender in communication in a setting of education and language teaching.


male students, female students, gender, gender differences, learning strategies, English language teaching

Full Text:



Ali, S. M. & Krish, P. (2016). Gender-Specific English Language Use of Malaysian Blog Authors. Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 16(3), 21-35.

Amir, Z., Abidin, H., Darus, S, & Ismail, K. (2012). Gender differences in the language use of Malaysian teen bloggers. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 12(1), 105-124

Anshori, D. S. (2016). Gender cognition in Religious Discourse: A Study of framing in thematic Holy Koran interpretation. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistic, 6(1), 88-98.

Azis, R. A., Jin, C. C., & Nordin, N. M. (2016). The use of interactional metadiscourse in the construction of gender identities among Malaysian ESL learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(1), 207-220

Biber, D & Burges, J. (2000). Historical change in the language use of women and men: Gender differences in dramatic dialogue. Journal of English Linguistics, 28(1), 21-37.

Božinovi, N. (2011). Gender differences in the use of learning strategies in adult foreign language learners. Dubrovnik, Croatia: American College of Management and Technology.

Burck, C. (2011). Living in several languages: Language, gender and identities. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 18(4), 361 –378.

Cabaysa, C. C. (2010). Language learning strategies of students at different levels of speaking proficiency. Education Quarterly, 68(1), 16-35.

Earl-Novell, S. (2001). Gendered styles of writing and the inequality in assessment, hypothesis: An explanation for gender differentiation in first class academic achievement at university. The International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 21(1), 160-172.

Eckert, P & McConnell-Ginet, S. (1994). Think practically and look locally: Language and gender as community-based practice. In C. Roman, S. Juhasz, & C. Miller (Eds.), The women and language debate, (pp. 432-460). New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal, 73(1), 1-13.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. New York: Oxford University

Gay, L.R., Mills, G.E., & Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research: Competencies for analysis & application. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

Giles, H. (2008). Communication accommodation theory. In L.A. Baxter & D. O. Braithwaite (Eds.), Engaging theories in interpersonal communication: Multiple perspectives (pp. 161-173). Thousand Oaks, SA, US: Sage Publication, Inc.

Gray, J. (1992). Men are from mars, women are from Venus: A practical guide for improving communication and getting what you want in your relationship. London: Thorsons.

Griffin, M.A., D. McGahee, & J. Slate. (1999). Gender differences in nonverbal communication. Valdosta State University.

Gurian, M. (2001). Boys and girls learn differently!. San fransisco, ca: jossey-bass. Kato, s. How language learning strategies affect English proficiency in Japanese university students. Journal of the Faculty of Human Studies, 7(1), 239-262.

Hassan, I. H. (2000). Language, gender, and power: Analysis of theme and topic management in Arabic conversational discourse. The Humanities and Social Science, 61, 591.

Hassan, R. (2017). Gaya dan Strategi Pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu dalam Kalangan Pelajar Perancis (Malay Language Learning Styles and Strategies among French Students). Gema Online Journal of Language Studies, 17(1), 125-146.

Hassaskhah, J. & Zamir, S. R. (2013). Gendered Teacher–Student Interactions in English Language Classrooms: A Case of Iranian College Context. SAGE Open, 1-2, 1-11.

Itakuro, H. & Tsui, A.B. M. (2004). Gender and conversation dominance in Japanese conversation. Language in Society, 33(2), 223-248.

Jamiah, Mahmud, M., Muhayyang, M. (2015). Do female and male students learn differently? ELT Worldwide, 2(2), 110-125.

Kato, S. (2005). How language learning strategies affect English proficiency in Japanese university students. Journal of the Faculty of Human Studies, 7(1), 239-262.

Kato, S. (2009). The relationship of language learning strategies and personality on English proficiency in Japanese university students. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(1), 141-162.

Keeler, W. (1990). Speaking of gender in Java. In J. M. Atkinston & S. Errington (Eds.). Power and difference: Gender in Island Southeast Asia (pp. 127-152). Stanford, California, Stanford University Press.

Keong, Y. C., Gill, S. K., Noorezam, M., & Abdulrazaq, A. (2012). Gender Differences and Culture in English Short Message Service Language among Malay University Students. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(2), 67–74

Khmakhien, A. (2012). Demystifying Thai EFL Learners’ Perceptual Learning Style Preferences. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(1), 61-74.

Kobayashi, Y. (2014). Gender gap in the EFL classroom in East Asia. Applied Linguistics, 35(2), 219-223.

Koeser, S. & Sczesny, S. (2014). Promoting Gender-Fair Language: The Impact of Arguments on Language Use, Attitudes, and Cognitions. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(5), 548 –560

Kuipers, J. C. (1990). Talking about troubles: Gender differences in Wayéwa ritual speech use. In J. M. Atkinston & S. Errington (Eds.). Power and difference: Gender in Island Southeast Asia (pp. 153-173). Stanford, California, Stanford University Press.

Krashen, S. (2013). Reading and vocabulary acquisition: Supporting evidence and some objections. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 27-43.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 2(1), 45-80. Cambridge University Press Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/4166707

Lakoff, R. T. (1976). Language and woman's place. New York: Octagon Books.

Lee, C. K. (2010). An overview of language learning strategies. Arecls, 7, 132-152.

Lee, J.F.K. & Collins, P. (2008). Gender voices in Hong Kong English textbooks: Some past and current practices. Sex Roles, 59(1), 127-137.

Li, J. (2005). An empirical study on learning strategies of tertiary-level EFL learners in China. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 2(1), 131-154.

Logan, S & Johnston, R. (2009). Gender differences in reading ability and attitude: examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 129-214.

Mahmud, M. (2008). Politeness in Bugis (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The Australian National University, Australia.

Mahmud, M. (2010). Language and gender in English language teaching. TEFLIN Journal, 21(2), 172-184.

Mahmud, M. (2015). Students’ expectations toward their teachers: A study on teachers’ competence, gender issues and politeness between teachers and students in Indonesian context. ELT Worldwide, 2(1), 96-112.

Martin, A., & Marsh, H. (2005). Motivating boys and motivating girls: Does teacher gender really make a difference? Australian Journal of Education, 49(3), 320-334.

Mellor, D. & Fung, S.W.T. (2012). Forgiveness, empathy, and gender: A Malaysian perspective. Sex Roles, 67(98), 1-7.

Nasab, M.S.H., & Motlagh, S.F.P. (2017). Male and female students' narrative similarities and differences in the advance levels in line with advance organizers. Communication and Linguistics Studies. Special Issue: Applied Linguistics in Line With TEFL, 3(1-1), 8-13. DOI: 10.11648/j.cls.s.2017030101.12

Oxford, R. (1989). Use of language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for teacher training. System, 17, 235-247.

Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.

Oxford, R. L. & Burry-Stock, J. (1995). Assessment the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory for language learning (SILL). System, 23(1), 1-23.

Oxford, R. L. (Ed.) (1996). Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

Oxford, R., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 166-174.

Park, G. & French, B. F. (2011). Beyond the mean differences of the SILL by gender: Differential item functioning. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 8(4), 175-203.

Puteh, M., Zin, Z. M. & Ismail, I. (2016). Reading Performance of Malaysian Students across Gender in PISA 2012. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 22(2), 109 – 121

Rahimi, M., & Hosseini Karkami, F. (2015). The role of teachers’ classroom discipline in their teaching effectiveness and students’ language learning motivation and achievement: A path method. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 3(1), 57-82

Roohani, A. & Zarei, M. (2013). Evaluating gender-bias in the Iranian pre-university English textbooks. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 115-125.

Sakurai, Y. (2012). Learners’ perceptions of “good” foreign language teachers: A quantitative analysis between native and non-native teachers. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 9(1), 46-60.

Seyyedrezaie, Z. S. & Vahedi, V. S. (2017). Projecting gender identity through metadiscourse

Marking: Investigating writers’ stance taking in written discourse. Indonesian journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(2), 301-310

Serag, A. (2011). Teaching English writing skills: developing learner autonomy in Japanese context. International Journal of Arts and Science, 4(10), 223-237.

Severiens, S & Dam, G. (2005). Soodmand Afshar, H., & Doosti M. (2014). Exploring the characteristics of effective Iranian EFL teachers from students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Iranian Journal of Applied Language Studies, 6(1), 205-230.

Stanton, A. (2001). Men and women in conversation: Finding a way to bridge the gap, University of Massachusetts. http://www.healthandage.com/public/health-center/28/article/1284/Men-and-Women-in-Conversation-Finding-a-Way.html. Accessed 10 July 2008.

Starbuck. (2003). College teaching styles by gender. Paper presented at Western Social Science Annual Meeting, April 9-12, 2003, Las Vegas, Nevada.

Tam, K. (2013). A study on language learning strategies (LLSs) of university students in Hong Kong (Unpublished Thesis). The University of Hong Kong.

Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Harper Collins.

Tannen, D. (1994). Gender and discourse. New York; Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Tymson, C. (1998). Gender games: Doing business with the opposite. Australia: Tymson Communication.

Vanfossen, B. (2001). Gender differences in communication. ITROW's Women and Expression Conference.

Viriya, C. & Sapsirin, S. (2014). Gender differences in language learning style language learning strategies. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 77-88. Retrieved on 22 September 2015. From http://ejournal.upi.edu/articl/download.

Wang, L. (2009). An empirical study of differences in the use of English vocabulary learning strategies. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 6(4), 151-192.

Yilmaz, C. (2010). The relationship between language learning strategies, gender, proficiency and self-efficacy beliefs: A study of ELT learners in Turkey. Procedia social & Behavioral Science journal, 2(2), 682-687. Retrieved on 22 September 2015. From www.sciencedirect.com/aticle

Younger, M. Warrington, M. & Jacquita, W. (1999). The gender gap and classroom interactions: Reality and rhetoric? British Journal of Socially of Education, 20(3).

Zhenhui, R. (2005). Gender, academic major, and Chinese students’ use of language learning strategies: social and educational perspectives. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 2(3), 115-138.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 4903 times | PDF view : 769 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

License URL: https://creativecommons.org/




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.