Hide
Show all
Email this article 
POEM-based SofLP’s Inculcation: A Way of Improving EFL Students’ Pragmatic Competence
(1) Politeknik Negeri Padang
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v4i2.13139
Abstract
The facts disclosed that some Indonesian ED students have difficulty disassembling the SIM in a practical sense. The scopes, focusing on merely learning factual knowledge of linguistic pragmatics and plus discussing the Western-based cases in point provided which are contrary to the Indonesian ED students’ real-world life social contexts, are the major quandaries of the students’ difficulties. The researcher, therefore, proposed such a title to practically bridge the students’ critical quandaries in interpreting the SIM. This was a qualitative method whose complete participation, field-notes, interviews, and iterative model and the 1984 Miles and Huberman Interactive model were the techniques of collecting and analysing the data respectively. The principal results practically signified that the poem-based SofLP’s inculcation better improve the Indonesian ED students’ pragmatic competence, HOTs (cognitive process and knowledge domains), linguistic intelligence and language skills. Besides, through poem, the pragmatic language teacher is encouraged to exploit the instructional strategies to establish and develop the students’ space practice, retrieval practice, elaboration, and collaboration. In conclusion, even though it seems weird, the poem or other literary works and digital media can critically serve as the learning media assisting the students acquire the SofLP.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
References
Adams, K. (12th of April 2016). How to Analyse a Poem. https://www.writerscookbook.com/how-to-analyse-a-poem/.
Alan., Bryman (2011). Business research methods. Bell, Emma, 1968- (3rd ed.). Cambridge: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, L.W. (Ed.), Krathwohl, D.R. (Ed.), Airasian, P.W., Cruikshank, K.A., Mayer, R.E., Pintrich, P.R., Raths, J., & Wittrock, M.C. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (Complete edition). New York: Longman.
Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Arcand, R. and N. Bourbeau. (1995). La communication efficace. De l’intention aux moyens d’expression, Anjou (Québec): CEC.
Ariel, Mira (2010). Defining Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ariel, Mira (2008). Pragmatics and Grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Atkinson, R.C.; Shiffrin, R.M. (1968). Chapter: Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of Learning and Motivation. 2. pp. 89–195. doi:10.1016/s0079-7421(08)60422-3
Beth, Evert Willem (1955). Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability.
Beaver, David. (1997). Presupposition. In J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), The Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, pp. 939–1008.
Berelson, Bernard (1952). Content Analysis in Communication Research. Glencoe, Ill: Free Press.
Bloom, B. S.; Engelhart, M. D.; Furst, E. J.; Hill, W. H.; Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Brasdefer, Cesar Felix. (2019). Pragmatics & Discourse at Indiana University (IU). Retrieved from https://pragmatics.indiana.edu/pragmatics/.
Bublitz, Wolfram. (2009) Englische Pragmatik – Eine Einführung. Berlin: Erich Schmidt.
Bussmann, H., G. Trauth, and K. Kazzazi 1998. Routledge dictionary of language and linguistics. Taylor and Francis.
Carston, Robyn (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Wiley-Blackwell. ISBN 978-0631214885.
CliffsNotes study guides (2016). How to Analyze Poetry. https://www.cliffsnotes.com/literature/a/american-poets-of-the-20th-century/how-to-analyze-poetry.
Collister, Lauren B. (March 2012). “The discourse deictics ∧and.” Discourse, Context & Media. 1 (1): 9–19. doi:10.1016/j.dcm.2012.05.002.
Comrie, Bernard (1976). "Linguistic politeness axes: Speaker-addressee, speaker-referent, speaker-bystander". Pragmatics Microfiche. 1 (7): A3–B1.
Cowley, S. (1998). “Of timing, turn-taking, and conversations.” Journal of Psycholinguistics Research. 27 (5): 541–571. doi:10.1023/A:1024948912805.
Cruse, Alan. (2006). A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Ltd.
Cutting, Joan. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse: A Resource Book for Students. NY: Routledge.
Daejin Kim et al. (2002) “The Role of an Interactive Book Reading Program in the Development of Second Langauge Pragmatic Competence,” The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 86, No. 3 (Autumn, 2002), pp. 332-348.
Dale April Koike (1989). “Pragmatic Competence and Adult L2 Acquisition”, the Modern Language Journal, Vol. 73, No. 3 (autumn, 1989), pp. 279-289.
Dijk, Teun A. van. (1977). Text and Context. Explorations in the Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse. London: Longman.
Doa yang tertukar. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4412533/heboh-doa-mbah-moen-fadli-zon-tulis-puisi-doa-yang-ditukar
Drew, Paul; Heritage, John (2006). Drew, Paul; Heritage, John (eds.). Conversation Analysis. I. London: SAGE Publications Ltd. pp. xxxiv. ISBN 978-1-4129-1848-0.
Duranti, Alessandro. (1997). "Linguistic Anthropology". Cambridge University Press.
Fillmore, Charles J. (1971). Lectures on Deixis. CSLI Publications (reprinted 1997).
Finkbeiner, Rita; Meibauer, Jörg; Schumacher, Petra B. (2012).What is a Context?: Linguistic Approaches and Challenges. John Benjamins Publishing.
Foley, William. 1997. Anthropological linguistics: An introduction. Blackwell Publishing.
Fraenkel, Jack R. & Wallen, Norman E. (2009). How to Designand EvaluateResearch in Education. 7th-Ed. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
Garfinkel, Harold (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.
Gardner. H. (2011). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligences. New York: Basic Books.
Gauker, Christopher. (1998). What is a Context of Utterance? The Philosophical Studies 91 (2):149-172 (1998), doi: 10.1023/A:1004247202476.
Gay, L.R, & Airasian, Peter. (2000). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis Application. 6th-Ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
Gillon, Brendan. (n.d) Grammatical Structure and its Interpretation: An Introduction to Natural Language Semantics. MIT Press. Chapter 4.
Givón, T. (1983), "Topic continuity in discourse: The functional domain of switch-reference", Switch Reference and Universal Grammar, Typological Studies in Language, 2, John Benjamins Publishing Company, p. 51, doi:10.1075/tsl.2.06giv.
Goldstein, E. Bruce, 1941- (2015). Cognitive psychology : connecting mind, research and everyday experience (4th ed.). New york: Cengage learning.
Goodwin, Charles; Duranti, Alessandro, eds. (1992). “Rethinking Context: an Introduction. Rethinking Context: Language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–42.
Grice, Herbert, Paul. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Cole & Morgan (1975:41-58, part of Grice, 1967).
Grice, Herbert, Paul. (1989). Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Green, Georgia. 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Gonzalez, J. (2016). 6 Powerful Learning Strategies you must share with the students https://www.cultofpedagogy.com/learning-strategies/
Hazlett, A. (2010). "The Myth of Factive Verbs". Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 80: 497. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2010.00338.x.
Hébert, Louis. (n.d.). The Functions of Language. http://www.signosemio.com/jakobson/functions-of-language.asp.
Holsti, Ole R. (1969). Content Analysis for the Social Sciences and Humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
Huang, Yan. 2007. Pragmatics, Oxford University Press. p.164.
Hymes, D., H. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, p.53-62.
Jakobson, R., (1960) “Linguistics and Poetics,” in T. Sebeok, ed., Style in Language, Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press, pp. 350-377.
Jefferson, Gail (1984). “Notes on some orderlinesses of overlap onset.” Discourse Analysis and Natural Rhetoric: 11–38.
Kang, E. (2019). 5 Research-Backed Studying Techniques https://www.edutopia.org/article/5-research-backed-studying-techniques.
Kadmon, Nirit. (2001) Formal pragmatics: semantics, pragmatics, presupposition, and focus. Great Britain: Wiley-Blackwell.
Kaplan, David (1979). On the logic of demonstratives. The Journal of Philosophical Logic 8:81-98.
Kaplan, David (1989). Demonstratives. In Joseph Almog, John Perry and Howard Wettstein (eds.) (1989), Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxofrd University Press, 481-563.
Kasper, Gabriele. (1997). Can pragmatic competence be taught? NetWork, 6, 105-119. Retrieved from http://www.nflrc.hawaii.edu/NetWorks/NW06/.
Kllnkenberg, J.-M., (1996). Précis de sémiotique générale, Paris: Seuil.
Krathwohl, D. R.; Bloom, B. S.; Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook II: the affective domain. New York: David McKay Company.
Kripke, Saul (2009) “Presupposition and Anaphora: Remarks on the Formulation of the Projection Problem,” Linguistic Inquiry, Vol. 40, No. 3, Pages 367-386.
Ladusaw, William. (2019). Meaning (Semantics and Pragmatics). Linguistic Society of America. Online. Retrieved on September 1, 2019 from https://www.linguisticsociety.org/resource/meaning-semantics-and-pragmatics.
Liddell, George, Henry; Scott, Robert; Jones, Stuart, Henry; & McKenzie, Roderick (1996). A Greek-English Lexicon (Greek Dictionary), 9th Edition with a Revised Supplement. USA: Oxford University Press.
Littlejohn, S. (2009). Speech act theory. In S. Littlejohn, & K. Foss (Eds.), Encyclopedia of communication theory. (pp. 919–921). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc. doi:10.4135/9781412959384.n356
Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
Levinson, Stephen C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalized conversational implicature. MIT Press.
Levinson, Stephen C. (2006) "Deixis". In Laurence R. Horn, Gregory L. Ward (eds.) The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 978–120. Blackwell Publishing.
Lyons, John (1977) "Deixis, space and time" in Semantics, Vol. 2, pp. 636–724. Cambridge University Press.
Maynard, Senko K. (1990). "Conversation Management in Contrast: Listener Response in Japanese and American English". Journal of Pragmatics. 14 (3): 397–412. doi:10.1016/0378-2166(90)90097-w.
Masahiro Takimoto. (2008). “The Effects of Deductive and Inductive Instruction on the Development of Language Learners' Pragmatic Competence", The Modern Language Journal, Vol. 92, No. 3 (Fall, 2008), pp. 369-386.
McEnery, T. 2000. Corpus-based and computational approaches to discourse anaphora. John Benjamins.
Mey, Jacob L. (1993). Pragmatics: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell (2nd ed. 2001).
Middleton, Richard (April 1, 1990). Studying Popular Music. Philadelphia, UK: McGraw-Hill Education. p. 241. ISBN 0-335-15275-9.
Moerman, Michael (1988). Talking Culture: Ethnography and Conversational Analysis. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt3fhhh2: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Morshead, Richard W. (1965). "On Taxonomy of educational objectives Handbook II: Affective domain" (PDF). Studies in Philosophy and Education. 4 (1): 164–170.
Nerlich, Brigitte, & Clarke David D. (1996). Language, Action and Context: The Early History of pragmatics in Europe and America 1780-1930. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
Nordquist, Richard. (May 30, 2019). Felicity Conditions: Definition and Examples: Propositional, Preparatory, Essential, and Sincerity. https://www.thoughtco.com/felicity-conditions-speech-1690855.
Novick, David G.; Hansen, Brian; Ward, Karen (1996). Coordinating turn-taking with gaze. Spoken Language, 1996. ICSLP 96. Proceedings., Fourth International Conference on. 3. pp. 1888–1891.
Nuel D. Belnap, Jr. (1966) “Questions, Answers, and Presuppositions,“ The Journal of Philosophy 63(20): 609–11, American Philosophical Association Eastern Division Sixty-Third Annual Meeting. doi:10.2307/2024255.
Orlich, Donald; Harder, Robert; Callahan, Richard; Trevisan, Michael; Brown, Abbie (2004). Teaching strategies: a guide to effective instruction (7th ed.). Houghton Mifflin.
Ottenheimer, Harriet (2009). The Anthropology of Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. pp. 129–145. ISBN 9781428848849.
Ottenheimer, Harriet (2009). The Anthropology of Speaking: an Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Belmont, CA: Wadswoth. p. 122. ISBN 9781111828752.
Pinker, Steven. (2007). The stuff off thought as a window into human nature. Penguin Books, ISBN 978-0-670-06327-7, pp. 6–9.
Ponte, de Maria, Korta Kepa & Perry, John. (2018). Utterance and Context. Retrieved from https://www.reserachgate.net 327405223_Utterance_and_Context.
Rastier, F., (1989). Meaning and Textuality, trans. Frank Collins and Paul Perron, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). "A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation." Language, 50, 696–735.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2006). Greetings forms in English and Persian: A sociopragmatic perspective. International Journal of Language, Culture, and Society, 17. online.
Salmani Nodoushan, M. A. (2018). Which view of indirect reports do Persian data corroborate? International Review of Pragmatics, 10(1), 76-100.
Sauerland, U (2007). Presupposition and Implicature in Compositional Semantics. Pelgrave.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. (2007). Sequence Organization in Interaction: A Primer in Conversation Analysis, Volume 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E & Sacks, H. (1973). Opening Up Closings http://web.stanford.edu/~eckert/PDF/schegloffOpeningUpClosings.pdf (p.74).
Searle, J.R., Vandervecken, D. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.
Searle, John R. (1975). “A Taxonomy of Illocutionary Acts,” in: Günderson, K. (ed.), Language, Mind, and Knowledge, Minneapolis, vol.7.
Searle, John R. (1969). Speech acts. Cambridge University Press.
Sedivy, Julie, and Carlson, Greg N. (2011). "Sold on Language: How Advertisers Talk to You and What This Says About You," Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 104-105.
Setiawan, E. (2019). Puisi. KKBI Online https://kbbi.web.id/puisi.
Shaozhong, Liu (2009). What is Pragmatics. Online. from https://web.archive.org/web/20090307222541/http://www.gxnu.edu.cn/Personal/szliu/definition.html.
Sharon E.; Heinich, Robert; Russell, James D. Smaldino. (2004). Instructional Technology and Media for Learning. New Jersey: Merrill Prentice Hall.
Silverstein, Michael. (1992). “The Indeterminacy of Contextualization: When is Enough Enough?” In Auer, Peter; Di Luzio, Aldo (eds.). The Contextualization of Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. pp. 55–76. Retrieved September 1, 2019.
Stalnaker, Robert. 1972. ‘Pragmatics.’ In D. Davidson & G. Harman, eds., Semantics of Natural Language, 380-97. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Song, L. (2010). The Role of Context in Discourse Analysis. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, Vol. 1, No. 6, pp. 876-879, doi:10.4304/jltr.1.6.876-879.
Spradley, James P. (1980). Participant Observation The developmental research sequence: Anthropology. University of Minnesota. Minnesota: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
The TFA Editorial Team. (2016). How to Analyze a Poem in 6 Steps: Help your students get the most out of poetry with these six practical steps. https://www.teachforamerica.org/stories/how-to-analyze-a-poem-in-6-steps.
Thomas. Jenny. 1995. Meaning in Interaction: an Introduction to Pragmatics. London/New York: Longman.
Tognini-Bonelli, E. 2001. Corpus linguistics at work. John Benjamins.
Tritsmans, B. (1987). “Poétique,” in M. Delcroix and F. Hallyn (dir.), Méthodes du texte. Introduction aux études littéraires, Paris: Duculot, pp. 11-28.
Waugh, Linda R. (1980). "The Poetic Function in the Theory of Roman Jakobson". Poetics Today. Duke University Press. 2 (1).
West, Candace (1979). "Against Our Will: Male Interruptions of Females in Cross-Sex Conversation". Language, Sex, and Gender: Does la Difference Make a Difference?: Result of a Workshop: New York Academy of Sciences, 1977. 327: 81–96. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1979.tb17755.x
Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics (Oxford Introductions to Language Study). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zon, Fadli. (07 February 2019). Kumpulan Puisi Karya Fadli Zon, Paling Baru Berjudul “Doa yang Ditukar.” Liputan 6 https://www.liputan6.com/citizen6/read/3889488/kumpulan-puisi-karya-fadli-zon-paling-baru-berjudul-doa-yang-ditukar.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 387 times | PDF view : 84 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.