The Impact of Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) on Improving Intermediate EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Learning

Fatemeh Enayati(1), Abbas Pourhosein Gilakjani(2*),

(1) Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran
(2) Lahijan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Lahijan, Iran
(*) Corresponding Author



Regarding the large amount of vocabulary that learners should learn and the limited amount of time available in the EFL classes, Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) is considered as an attractive option for learning. One specific benefit of using CALL vocabulary instruction is to provide systematic repetition of words, ensuring that learned words are not forgotten. The objective of current investigation is to examine the effect of CALL on Iranian intermediate learners’ vocabulary learning. The researchers used Tell Me More (TEM) software for this objective. This investigation used Preliminary English Test (PET) as a standardized measurement to seek the level of the subjects in terms of language proficiency. Then, the researchers assigned the participants into two groups: experimental group and control group. Experimental group included 31 EFL students and control group involved 30 EFL students. 80 items were administered as pre-test to evaluate the participants’ previous knowledge of English in respect to the vocabularies. The researchers taught the students of both groups for 12 sessions. The TEM software was used as treatment in experimental group and the control group received no treatment. The taught words were the same in both groups. After 12 sessions, the 65 items were administered as post-test in order to compare the results of the scores of two groups and decide about the effectiveness of the treatment. The data were analyzed through running the Independent sample t-test. The results of post-test showed that the participants of experimental group outperformed the control group and had positive attitudes towards CALL. The results of this study may be useful for EFL teachers, EFL learners, and syllabus designers.


CALL; TEM; EFL learners; Vocabulary Learning

Full Text:



Ahmadian, M., Amerian, M., & Goodarzi, A. (2015). A Comparative study of paper-based and computer-based contextualization in vocabulary learning of EFL students. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 96-97. URL: doi:10.7575/aiac.alls.v.6n.2p.96

Akhlaghi, M., & Zareian, G. (2015). The effect of power point presentation on grammar and vocabulary learning of Iranian pre-university EFL learners. Academic Research International, 6(1), 160-165. Accessed 7 October 2019.

Aryadoust, V., & Lashkary, H. (2009). Teaching aids: Effective in Iranian students lexical acquisition? Asian EFL Journal, 11(3), 329-351. Accessed 2 October 2019.

Bagheri, E., Roohani, A., & Nejad, A. D. (2012). Effect of CALL-based and non-CALL based methods of teaching on L2 vocabulary Learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 3(4), 744-752. doi: 10.4304/jltr.3.4.744-752

Barrios Espinosa, E. (2013). Learning English using Tell Me More: Perspectives of university teach¬ing staff as users of the online application. Revista de Educación, 362, 506–534. https://doi. org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2013-362-240.

Ebbers, S. M., & Denton C. A. (2008). A root awakening: Vocabulary instruction for older students with reading difficulties. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 23(2), 90-102. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5826.2008.00267.x Accessed 11 October 2019.

Getkham, K. (2005). The effects of using the multimedia computer program on vocabulary acquisition and retention. Paper presented at the 5th Annual conference of Practical Applications in Language and Computers, Lodz, Poland.

Girgin, E. G. (2011). A web 2.0 tool for language teaching with flash content. Procedia Computer Science, 3, 627–631.

Gyamfi, G., & Sukseemuang, P. (2017). Effect of “Tell Me More” on EFL undergraduate students’ English language achievement. Open Praxis, 9(4), 449-461. doi:

Hajebi, M., Taheri, S., Fahandezh, F., & Salari, H. (2018). The role of Web-based language teaching on vocabulary retention of adult pre-intermediate EFL learners. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(2), 372-378. doi:

Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Nicolae, I. (2005). Expanding academic vocabulary with an interactive on-line database. Language Learning and Technology, 9(2), 90–110. › archives › sla › horst Accessed 26 September 2019.

Jafari, S., & Chalak, A. (2016). The role of whatsApp in teaching vocabulary to Iranian EFL learners at junior high school. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 85-92. URL: doi: 10.5539/elt.v9n8p85

Kabilan, M. K., Ahmad, N., & Zainol Abidin, M. J. (2010). Facebook: An online environment for learning of English in institutions of higher education? Internet and Higher Education, 13(4), 179-187.

Kilickaya, F. & Krajka, J. (2010). Collaborative usefulness of online and traditional vocabulary learning. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 9(3), 55-63. Accessed 27 September 2019.

Kim, H., & Kwon, Y. (2012). Exploring smartphone applications for effective mobile-assisted language learning. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 15(1), 31-57. › wp-content › uploads › 2013/05 Accessed 26 September 2019.

Kitajima, R. (2001). The effect of instructional conditions on students’ vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals 34(5), 470- 483. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2001.tb02086.x

Ko, M. H., & Goranson, J. (2014). Technology-assisted vocabulary learning and student learning outcomes: A case study. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 17(1), 11-33. Accessed 2 October 2019.

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon Press Inc. › content › books › principles_and_practice Accessed 26 September 2019.

Lauc, T., Matić, S., & Mikelić, N. (2007). Project of developing the multimedia software supporting teaching and learning of English vocabulary. Proceedings of the 1stInternational scientific conference, The Future of Information Sciences: INFuture2007 –Digital Information and Heritage.,%20Project%20of%20Developing%20the%20Multimedia%20Software.pdf Accessed 2 October 2019.

Mazman, S. G., & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of facebook. Computers & Education, 55(2), 444-453.

Miles, S., & Kwon, C-J. (2008). Benefits of using CALL vocabulary programs to provide systematic word recycling. English Teaching, 63(1), 199-216. doi: 10.15858/engtea.63.1.200803.199

Mousavi, S. S., & Nemati, A. (2017). A comparative study of the Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary learning through two different formats: Paper & pencil vs. software. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 6(1), 113-131.

Nagy, W. (2005). Why vocabulary instruction needs to be long-term and comprehensive. In E. H. Hiebert and M. L. Kamil (Eds.), Teaching and learning vocabulary: Bringing research to practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Naraghizadeh, M., & Barimani, S. (2013). The effect of CALL on the vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Academic and Applied Studies, 3(8), 1-12.

Nation, I. S. P. (2008). Teaching vocabulary: Strategies and techniques. Boston: Heinle Cengage Learning. Accessed 27 September 2019.

Nielson, K. (2011). Self-study with language learning software in the workplace: What happens? Language Learning & Technology, 15(3), 110–129.

Noeparast, N., & Khatami, M. (2014). The effect of using net support school software on Iranian intermediate EFL learners’ vocabulary retention and reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Investigations, 1(1), 305-312. › IJEIonline_Vol.1_No.1_pp.305-312_code34.pdf Accessed 26 September 2019.

Ostovar-Namaghi, S. A., & Malekpur, A. (2015). Vocabulary learning strategies from the bottom-pp: A grounded theory. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 15(2), 235-251. Accessed 11 October 2019.

Scarborough, H. S. (2009). Connecting early language and literacy to later reading (dis)abilities: Evidence, theory, and practice. In F. Fletcher-Campbell, J. Soler & G. Reid (Eds.), Approaching difficulties in literacy development: Assessment, pedagogy and programmes (pp. 23-38). London: Sage.

Shahrokni, S. A. (2009). Second language incidental vocabulary learning: The effect of online textual, pictorial, and textual pictorial glosses. TESL-EJ, 13(3), 1-17. › wordpress › issues › volume13 Accessed 26 September 2019.

Tabatabaei, O., & Heidari Goojani, A. (2012). The impact of text-messaging on vocabulary learning of Iranian EFL learners. Cross Cultural Communication, 8(2), 47-55. doi:10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120802.1689

Tamjid, N. H., & Moghadam, S. (2012). The effect of using vocabulary teaching software on Iranian intermediate EFL learners' vocabulary acquisition. World Applied Sciences Journal, 19(3), 387-394. doi: 10.5829/idosi.wasj.2012.19.03.1164

Thornbury, S. (2002). How words are learned? In J. Harmer (Ed.), How to teach vocabulary (pp. 13-31). Malaysia: Pearson Education.

Wang, B. T., Teng, C. V., & Chen, H. T. (2015). Using iPad to facilitate English vocabulary learning. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 5(2), 100-104.

Yunus, M., Hasim, H., Embi, M. A., & Lubis, M. A. (2010). The utilization of ICT in the teaching and learning of English: ‘Tell Me More.’ Procedia. Social and Behavioural Sciences, 9, 685–691.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 294 times | pdf view : 45 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

License URL:




Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.