English Instructional Model Used by the Lecturers in Preparation to Teach Speaking Skill at Makassar Muhammadiyah University

Fitrisyam Harming(1*), Andi Tenri Ampa(2), Syamsiarna Nappu(3),

(1) Makassar Muhammadiyah University
(2) Muhammadiyah Makassar University
(3) Muhammadiyah Makassar University
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v9i1.29633

Abstract


The main objective of this research is to discover the instructional design model (IDM) that used by the English lecturers in preparation to teach speaking skill specifically in English Department of Makassar Muhammadiyah University. The models are ADDIE, Kemp, and ASSURE model. In addition, the efficiency of the instructional design model application by lecturers is also demonstrated in this research by the students' speaking skill achievement data. This research used mix method design. The subject of the research were 1 lecturer and 29 students from English Department of Makassar Muhammadiyah University. The instruments used interview and questionnaire (for lecturer) and test as the instrument (for students’ speaking achievement). Result of the research demonstrated that the ADDIE Model was implemented 91% of the stages, then Kemp and ASSURE models were implemented 100%. Finally, the lecturer complete 96% of the stages from the three IDM models. Then, students' speaking skill achievement presents that 10.3% of students were in the very good category, 34.4% were in the good category, 48.3% were in the average category, and 0% of students were in the poor category. So, it can be concluded from the research that when the instructional design model was effectively implemented, students' speaking skills improved significantly. This is evidenced by the absence of students who were in the poor category.


Keywords


Instructional Design Model, Speaking Skill, Mix Method

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdullah, M. (2015). Metode penelitian kuantitatif. Aswaja pressindo.

Adhabi, E., & Anozie, C. B. (2017). Literature review for the type of interview in qualitative research. International Journal of Education, 9(3), 86–97.

Akbar, A. (2018). English As an International Language and Implication on English Teacher’S Roles and Student English Learning. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 6(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v6i2.521

An, Y. (2021). A history of instructional media, instructional design, and theories. International Journal of Technology in Education (IJTE), 4(1), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.35

Athuraliya, Amanda. (2021). Top 7 Instructional Design Models to Create Effective Learning Material. Retrieved from https://creately.com/blog/diagrams/instructional-design-models-process/

Bailey, K., & Nunan, D. (2019). Practical english language teaching speaking. 104.

Bajracharya, J. R. (2019). Instructional Design and Models: ASSURE and Kemp. Journal of Education and Research, 9(2), 1–9.

Birgili, B. (2013). EDS 541 Instructional Design. Spring.

Boonkit, K. (2010). Enhancing the development of speaking skills for non-native speakers of English. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 1305–1309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.191

Branch, R. M., & Kopcha, T. J. (2014). Instructional design models. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 77-87). Springer New York.

Branch, R.M, & Merrill, M. . (2012). Characteristics of instructional design models. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 3, 8–16.

Heaster-Ekholm, K. (2020). Popular Instructional Design Models: Their Theoretical Roots and Cultural Considerations. International Journal of Education and Development Using Information and Communication Technology (IJEDICT), 16(3), 50–65.

Ibrahim, A. A. (2015). Comparative Analysis between System Approach, Kemp, Journal. 3(12), 261–270.

Işman, A. (2011). Instructional design in education: New model. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 10(1), 136–142.

Isman, A., Abanmy, F. A., Hussein, H. B., & Al Saadany, M. A. (2012). Effectiveness of Instructional Design Model (Isman-2011) in Developing the Planning Teaching Skills of Teachers College Students’ At King Saud University. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 11(1), 71–78.

Kim, D., & Downey, S. (2016). Examining the Use of the ASSURE Model by K–12 Teachers. Computers in the Schools, 33(3), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2016.1203208

Koszalka, T. A., Russ-Eft, D. F., & Reiser, R. (2013). Instructional designer competencies: The standards. IAP.

Mutlu, G. (2016). A qualitative analysis and comparison of the two contemporary models of instructional design. Journal of Human Sciences, 13(3), 6154. https://doi.org/10.14687/jhs.v13i3.4350

Merrill, M. D. (2012). First principles of instruction. John Wiley & Sons.

Nasution, H. F. (2016). Instrumen penelitian dan urgensinya dalam penelitian kuantitatif. Al-Masharif: Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Keislaman, 4(1), 59–75.

Nazara, S. (2011). Students’ Perception on EFL Speaking Skill Development. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 1(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v1i1.50

Newby, P. (2014). Research methods for education (Second). Routledge.

NTCE. 2013. Oral presentation rubric 3-12. Newark, DE: IRA. Available at: www.readwritething.org/classroomresources/printouts/oralpresentation-rubric-30700.html.

Pabrua Batoon, M. V., Glasserman Morales, L. D., & Yanez Figueroa, J. A. (2018). Instructional design to measure the efficacy of interactive e-books in a high school setting. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.415641

Reigeluth, C. M., Beatty, B. J., & Myers, R. D. (2016). Instructional-design theories and models: The learner-centered paradigm of education. In Instructional-Design Theories and Models: The Learner-Centered Paradigm of Education (Vol. 4). Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315795478

Reigeluth, C. M., & An, Y. (2020). Merging the instructional design process with learner-centered theory: The holistic 4D model. Routledge.

Schreiber, J., & Asner-Self, K. (2011). Educational research: The interrelationship of questions, sampling, design, and analysis. Wiley.

Spector, J. M., Merrill, M. D., Elen, J., & Bishop, M. J. (2014). Handbook of research on educational communications and technology: Fourth edition. Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology: Fourth Edition, 1–1005. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5

Suharli. (2015). Teori Belajar dan Model Penerapannya dalam Pembelajaran. UPI

Sulistiyo, U. (2016). English language teaching and efl teacher competence in indonesia. Igniting a Brighter Future of Efl Teaching and Learning in Multilingual Societies, 4(2), 396–406. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/selt/article/view/7001/5535

Thwaites Bee, D., & Murdoch-Eaton, D. (2016). Questionnaire design: The good, the bad and the pitfalls. Archives of Disease in Childhood: Education and Practice Edition, 101(4), 210–212. https://doi.org/10.1136/archdischild-2015-309450

Weaver, Diane. (2019). How Instructional Design Benefits Your Learning Programs. Retrieved from https://coursetune.com/how-instructional-design-benefits-your-learning-programs/


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 44 times | PDF view : 10 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

INDEXING

  

     

 

      


EDITORIAL OFFICE

ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching

English Language Education Graduate Program, Universitas Negeri Makassar.

 

Jalan Bonto Langkasa, Banta-Bantaeng, Rappocini, Banta-Bantaeng, Kec. Rappocini, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90222.

E-Mail: elt.worldwide@unm.ac.id


e-ISSN: 2503-2291

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
ELT Worlwide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.