Tailoring CEFR to BISOL (Bahasa Indonesia for Speakers of Other Languages): A Model for Integrative Language Teaching Materials
(1) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(2) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(3) HTWG Konstanz
(4) Universitas Sebelas Maret
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v7i4.53219
Abstract
This study aims to adapt CEFR in developing an integrative approach-based teaching material model for a pre-basic BISOL class. The method used in this research is the development research design by Borg and Gall. This study was development research. The stages are identification of the problem, formulation of a hypothetical draft model; feasibility testing by experts; product revision; and test product effectiveness. The data were collected through survey techniques, interviews, and documentation. The needs identification results revealed data encompassing 10 themes, 5 tasks per theme, and diverse evaluations comprising theory, in-class practice, and real-world field assignments, both on an individual and group basis. These identified needs require alignment with CEFR A1 for the development of BISOL learning. These findings were subsequently incorporated into the design of the teaching material model, and the results indicated that tailoring CEFR to BISOL as an integrative language teaching material model was feasible for application in the classroom, as assessed by experts. The implications suggest that integrating CEFR into BISOL is highly feasible for the development of teaching materials, and teachers can leverage this instructional model to enhance students' proficiency in the Indonesian language.
.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ambrósio, S., Sá, M. H. A. e, & Simões, A. R. (2014). Lifelong Learning in Higher Education: The Development of Non-traditional Adult Students’ Plurilingual Repertoires. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116(Section 4), 3798–3804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.844
Arikan, A. (2015). The CEFR and Reading: A Document Analysis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 501–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.538
Bowen, T., & Drysdale, M. (2017). Work-integrated learning in the 21st century: Global perspectives on the future. Emerald Group Publishing.
Brevik, L. M., & Rindal, U. (2020). Language Use in the Classroom: Balancing Target Language Exposure With the Need for Other Languages. TESOL Quarterly, 54(4), 925–953. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.564
Casas-Tost, H., & Rovira-Esteva, S. (2014). New models, old patterns? The implementation of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages for Chinese. Linguistics and Education, 27, 30–38. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2014.07.001
Gall, M. D., & Borg, W. R. (1989). Educational research. A guide for preparing a thesis or dissertation proposal in education. ERIC.
Holzknecht, F., Huhta, A., & Lamprianou, I. (2018). Comparing the outcomes of two different approaches to CEFR-based rating of students’ writing performances across two European countries. Assessing Writing, 37, 57–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2018.03.009
Johnson, A., & Kuntz, S. (1992). Towards an understanding of integrative curriculum: Applications for teacher education. Teacher Education Quarterly, 45–50. https://doi.org/https://www.jstor.org/stable/23475626
Lavicza, Z., Fenyvesi, K., Lieban, D., Park, H., Hohenwarter, M., Mantecon, J. D., & Prodromou, T. (2021). This is a self-archived version of an original article . This version may differ from the original in pagination and typographic details. Business and Society, 60(2), 420–453.
Li, P., & Clariana, R. B. (2019). Reading comprehension in L1 and L2: An integrative approach. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 50(March), 94–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2018.03.005
Malik, S., Qin, H., & Oteir, I. (2021). Perceived psychological, linguistic and socio-cultural obstacles: An investigation of english communication apprehension in efl learners. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 733–752. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14442a
Muliastuti, L. (2002). Dasar-dasar Pengajaran BISOL. Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Nzomo, P., McKenzie, P., Ajiferuke, I., & Vaughan, L. (2021). Towards a Definition of Multilingual Information Literacy (MLIL): An Essential Skill for the 21st Century. Journal of Library Administration, 61(7), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2021.1972737
Pietikäinen, S. (2018). Investing in indigenous multilingualism in the Arcticle. Language and Communication, 62, 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.05.001
Shee, N. K. (2018). Karen Education Department’s multilingual education for language maintenance. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences.
Solikhah, I., & Budiharso, T. (2020). Exploring cultural inclusion in the curriculum and practices for teaching bahasa indonesia to speakers of other languages. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 11(3), 177–197.
St. John, S. K., & Murphy, M. (2019). Education and public policy in the European Union: Crossing boundaries. In Education and Public Policy in the European Union: Crossing Boundaries. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04230-1
Supeni, S., & Fauziah, A. (2020). Aligning The Toefl Prediction Scores To The Common European Framework Of Reference For Languages (CEFR) Level. Journal of English Language and Literature (JELL), 5(01), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.37110/jell.v5i01.93
Tymkiv, N., Nychkalo, N., & Lukianova, L. (2022). Implementation of the Professionally-Oriented Foreign Language Competence in Terms of Integrative Approach for Training Future Engineers. The New Educational Review, 67, 144–158. https://doi.org/DOI: 10.15804/tner.22.67.1.11
ÿaĿatay, S., & Gürocak, F. ÿnveren. (2016). Is CEFR Really over There? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.096
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 776 times | PDF view : 216 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
License URL: https://creativecommons.org/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.