Students’ Perceptions of a Blended Course and its Effectiveness at a Mongolian University

Oyuntsetseg Namjildorj(1*), Munkhtuya Buyandelger(2), Azzaya Tserendorj(3),

(1) University of the Humanities, Mongolia
(2) University of the Humanities, Mongolia
(3) University of the Humanities, Mongolia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v10i1.44506

Abstract


Blended learning has been considered one of the modern delivery modes of teaching and learning since the COVID-19 pandemic outreach. Although e-learning has been developing in most countries, its importance and needs were highly acknowledged by all educational organizations worldwide during COVID-19. All educational institutions worldwide run online or blended courses at some stage of their training. Regarding temporary demands such as the pandemic, learners had to study through online learning, and now it has become one of their regular learning modes. Meanwhile, educational institutions and their stakeholders were experiencing both online and blended programs and were provided opportunities to compare different delivery methods. Therefore, blended learning and teaching have become a more profitable way of teaching, especially in higher education. This article investigates the student’s perceptions of blended learning and its effectiveness based on the case of a Mongolian university. To achieve this goal, we conducted qualitative and quantitative research. The survey included 182 students from first-year to senior year to identify the challenges they faced, the experiences they gained, and their evaluation of the blended courses they enrolled in. The research questions were created on Google form, data was electronic via emails, and focused group interviews were conducted simultaneously. As a result of the survey, it has been revealed that there are several benefits and advantages to blended courses in the tertiary education sector of Mongolia. However, key factors such as the learning styles of Mongolian students, appropriate learning environment and course design, access to technology, and effective organization should be improved in the future in order to run the blended courses successfully.


Keywords


higher education institutions; blended course; blended learning; learning styles; teaching styles

Full Text:

PDF

References


Attard, C., & Holmes, K. (2022). An exploration of teacher and student perceptions of blended learning in four secondary mathematics classrooms. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-020-00359-2

Bath, D., & Bourke, J. (2010). Getting started with Blended Learning. Griffith University: Griffith Institute for Higher Education.

Borba, M. C., Askar, P., Engelbrecht, J., Gadanidis, G., Llinares, S., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Blended learning, e-learning, and mobile learning in mathematics education. ZDM, 48(5), 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0798-4

Dharmawardene, R. P., & Wijewardene, L. (2021). Effectiveness of Teaching in Blended Mode: A Case Study from Sri Lankan University System. OALib, 08(09), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.4236/oalib.1107883

Garner, B., & Oke, L. (2017). Blended Learning: Theoretical foundations.

Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating Professional Development. Corwin Press Inc.

Haddad, W. D. (2004). ICTs for Education: A Reference Handbook. UNESCO.

Huang, B., Hew, K. F., & Lo, C. K. (2019). Investigating the effects of gamification-enhanced flipped learning on undergraduate students’ behavioral and cognitive engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(8), 1106–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1495653

Kashefi, H., Ismail, Z., & Mohamad Yusof, Y. (2017). Integrating Mathematical Thinking and Creative Problem-Solving in Engineering Mathematics Blended Learning. Sains Humanika, 9(1–2). https://doi.org/10.11113/sh.v9n1-2.1092

Kastner, J. A. (2020). Blended Learning: Moving Beyond the Thread Quality of Blended Learning and Instructor Experiences. Journal of Educators Online.

Kintu, M. J., Zhu, C., & Kagambe, E. (2017). Blended learning effectiveness: the relationship between student characteristics, design features, and outcomes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0043-4

Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Belland, B. R., & Schroder, K. E. E. (2013). A Predictive Study of Student Satisfaction in Online Education Programs.

Lazar, I. M., Panisoara, G., & Panisoara, I. O. (2020). Digital technology adoption scale in the blended learning context in higher education: Development, validation, and testing of a specific tool. PLOS ONE, 15(7), e0235957. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235957

Ministry of Digital Development and Communication of Mongolia, & National Statistics Committee of Mongolia. (2021). The survey on household and personal information and the use of ICT.

National Statistics Office of Mongolia. (2021). Education, Science, and Intellectual Property.

Park, H., & Choi, H. J. (2009). Factors Influencing Adult Learners’ Decision to Drop Out or Persist in Online Learning. Educational Technology & Society, 12(4), 2072–2217.

Poon, J. (2013). Blended Learning: An Institutional Approach for Enhancing Students’ Learning Experiences. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 9(2), 271–289.

Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2014). Essentials for Blended Learning: A standards-Based Guide. Routledge.

Tong, D. H., Uyen, B. P., & Ngan, L. K. (2022). The effectiveness of blended learning on students’ academic achievement, self-study skills, and learning attitudes: A quasi-experiment study in teaching the conventions for coordinates in the plane. Heliyon, 8(12), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e12657

United States Department of Commerce. (2010). Visions 2020.2: Student views on transforming education and training through advanced technologies.

Vasileva-Stojanovska, T., Malinovski, T., Vasileva, M., Jovevski, D., & Trajkovik, V. (2015). Impact of satisfaction, personality and learning style on educational outcomes in a blended learning environment. Learning and Individual Differences, 38, 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.01.018


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 225 times | PDF view : 88 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats

Published by:

Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Jalan Bonto Langkasa, Banta-Bantaeng, Rappocini, Banta-Bantaeng, Kec. Rappocini, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90222
elt.worldwide@unm.ac.id

E-ISSN: 2503-2291

P-ISSN: 2303-3037


ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- 4.0 International License.