“Anti-Texture” Agents in the Written English Essays of Students in a Ghanaian University
(1) University of Health and Allied Sciences
(2) Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
(3) Kwame Nkrumah University
(4) University of Zambia
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v11i1.61014
Abstract
Texture proves to be a key indicator for measuring the quality of a text but establishing this text quality is a challenge for most English as a Second Language (ESL) students. This challenge has led to an array of studies to find the root cause(s) of this/these writing challenge(s) of ESL students. Despite these numerous studies, there is still paucity of research on “anti-texture” agents in the written English essays of students from the Ghanaian context, especially those at the tertiary level. In filling this gap, this study uses Halliday and Hasan’s (1976) cohesive theory as a framework to explore the types of cohesive errors that serve as “anti-texture” agents in 150 written English essays of students from a Ghanaian university. Because of the highly descriptive nature of this current investigation, it uses the qualitative content analysis as its design. The findings show that challenges like unclear pronoun references, wrong selection of cohesive devices, over usages of one cohesive device within the same textual environments, wider textual distances between references and their referents, the omission of cohesive devices, wrong insertions of cohesive devices and references lacking referents served as barriers to ESL students quest to use cohesive devices as means of creating texture in their texts. The findings further confirmed that the inappropriate use of cohesive devices in the students’ essays disrupted the free flow of information and as such, rendered the essays incoherent. The study has pedagogical implication for ESL academic writing instructors and curriculum developers.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adeyemi, R. I. (2017). Corpus-based analysis of cohesion in written English essays of Nigerian tertiary learners (Doctoral dissertation). Vaal Triangle Campus: North-West University (South Africa). Retrieved from https://repository.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/24878.
Adika, G. S. (2010). Infelicitous use of anaphoric" this" in undergraduate academic writing. Legon Journal of the Humanities, 21, 99-126.
Adjei, A.A. (2015). Analysis of subordination errors in students’ writings: A study of selected teacher training colleges in Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(8), 62-77.
Afriani, Z. L. (2018). The use of cohesive devices in students’ argumentative essays. Linguists: Journal of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 4(1), 31-47.
Akindele, J. (2011). Cohesive Devices in Selected ESL Academic Papers. African Nebula, 1(3).
Alamiri, Z. (2020). Understanding the Qurʾān textuality: A preliminary SFL-based analysis of the Qurʾān as text. International Journal of Arabic Linguistics, 6(1-2), 139-166.
Almaden, D. O. (2006). An analysis of the topical structure of paragraphs written by Filipino students. The Asia-Pacific Education Research, 15(1), 127-153.
Amoakohene, B. (2017). Error analysis of students essays: A case of first year students of the University of Health and Allied Sciences. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(4), 54-68.
Amoakohene, B. (2020). An exploration of texture in Ghanaian undergraduate students’ essays (PhD thesis). University of the Western Cape. Retrieved from https://etd.uwc.ac.za/handle/11394/8102.
Amoakohene, B., & Afful, J. B. A. (2021). A cross-cultural study of semantic ties in the abstracts of conference proceedings. Globe: A Journal of Language, Culture and Communication, 13, 30-46. https://doi.org/10.5278/ojs.globe.v13i.6749.
Kennedy, G. (2003). Structure and meaning in English: A guide for teachers. Pearson Education.
Amua-Sekyi, E.T. (2000). The status of English as a subject in an English medium context: The Ghanaian situation. The Oguaa Educator, 12(2).
Bowen, N., & Thomas, N. (2020). Manipulating texture and cohesion in academic writing: A keystroke logging study. Journal of Second Language Writing 50, 100773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100773.
Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge University Press.
Carrell, P. L. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 479-488.
Crane, P. A. (2006). Texture in text: A discourse analysis of a news article using Halliday and Hasan’s model of cohesion. 名古屋外国語大学外国語学部紀要, 30, 131-156.
Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The tool for the automatic analysis of text cohesion (TAACO): Automatic assessment of local, global, and text cohesion. Behavior research methods, 48, 1227-1237.
Crossley, S., Clevinger, A., & Kim, Y. (2014). The role of lexical properties and cohesive devices in text integration and their effect on human ratings of speaking proficiency. Language Assessment Quarterly, 11(3), 250-270.
Dako, K., Denkabe, A. & Forson B. (1997). The Ghanaian university students’ knowledge of grammar. English in Ghana, Kropp Dakubu, M. E. (ed.), GESA, Black Mask, Accra, pp. 53-68.
Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd ed.). London, England: Continuum.
El-Gazzar, N. K. (2006). Lexical cohesive devices in Arab students' academic writing: Implications for teaching vocabulary (Doctoral dissertation). American University of Sharjah.
Faradhibah, R. N., & Nur, N. A. (2017). Analyzing students’ difficulties in maintaining their coherence and cohesion in writing process. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 3(2), 183-194.
Fengjie, L., Xiuying, Y., & Chuanze, Z. (2014). Analysis of the problems on coherence in college English writing. International Journal of Language and linguistics, 2(6), 387-390.
Forey, G., & Thompson, G. (2008). Text type and texture. Equinox Pub.
Gumperz, J. (1968). The speech community. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 9(3), 381-386.
Gyasi, I. K. (1990). The State of English in Ghana. English Today, 23, 24-26. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266078400004879
Hajalzen, R. I. (2017). Investigating the Difficulties Encountered by University Students in Using Cohesive Devices in Writing (Doctoral dissertation). Sudan: University of Science and Technology.
Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman: London.
Hamdi, S. (2005). An analysis of written grammatical errors of Tunisian learners of English in EFL context. Tunisia: ISEAH Institute of Kef. Retrieved from https://web.aou.edu.lb/ar/research/Documents/4-article%201.pdf
Hsiel, H. F. & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277-1288.
Kadiri, G. C., Igbokwe, U. L., Okebalama, U. N., & Egbe, C. I. (2016). The use of lexical cohesion elements in the writing of ESL learners. Research in Language, 14(3), 221-234.
Khansir, A. (2013). Error analysis and second language writing. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2), 363. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.2.363-370
Listiani, M. (2014). An error analysis of students writing: A descriptive study of students’ English writing of second grade of SMK Bakti purwokento (An unpublished post diploma degree thesis). Central Java: Muhammadiyah University of Purwokerto, Republic of Indonesia.
Malah, Z., Tan, H., & Rashid, S. M. (2016). Evaluating lexical cohesion in Nigerian newspaper genres: Focus on the editorials. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(1), 240-256.
Maton, K. (2020). Semantic waves: Context, complexity and academic discourse. In J. R. Martin, K. Maton, & Y. Doran (Eds.), Academic discourse: An inter-disciplinary dialogue (pp. 59–85). Routledge.
Mensah, G. (2014). Cohesion in the essay of final year Senior High School students in Accra Academy (Master’s thesis, University of Ghana, Legon).
Mireku-Gyimah, P. (2014). Analysis of errors in the English of final year university students: A case study at the University of Mines and Technology. Journal of ELT and Applied Linguistics (JELTAL), 2(4), 23-46.
Morris, J., & Hirst, G. (1991). Lexical cohesion computed by thesaural relations as an indicator of the structure of text. Computational linguistics, 17(1), 21-48
Nikcevic-Milkovic, A., N. M., Katica, B., & Jasminka, B. M. (2022). Self-regulated learning and sociodemographic factors in students’l1/l2 writing proficiency. Journal of Language and Education, 8(1) 29, 100-116.
Noah, Y., & Olagbemi, A. (1988). Language, Society and Culture. Communication, Language & Culture in Society. Nigeria: Bolaji and Associates.
Olateju, M. A. (2006). Cohesion in ESL classroom written texts. Nordic Journal of African Studies, 15 (3), 314-331.
Patton, M.Q. (2020). Qualitative research and evaluation method. Retrieved from https://aulasvirtuales.files.wordpress.com/2014/02/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods-by-michael-patton.pdf
Pineteh, E. (2013). The academic writing challenges of undergraduate students: A South African case study. International Journal of Higher Education, 3(1),12. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n1p12
Quibol-Catabay, M. (2016). Error analysis in students’ writing. International Journal of Advanced Research Management and Social Sciences, 5(1), 131-148.
Ralf, F. (2018). Coherence: Writing clearly facilitates manuscript acceptance. Germany Open Access Expert: University of Hamburg.
Richards, J. & Renandya, W. (Eds.) (2002). Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190
Rusdiah & Malombassang (2019). An error enalysis of the cohesive devices made by the students in writing paragraph. Tamaddun, 17(2), 26-33.
Sarfraz, S. (2011). Error analysis of the written English essays of Pakistani undergraduate students: A case study. Asian Transactions on Basic & Applied sciences, 1(3), 29-5.
Seken, K., & Suarnajaya, W. (2013). An Analysis of the Cohesion and Coherence of StudentsEnglish Writings at the Second Grade of Sman 1 Labuapi West Lombok. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Indonesia, 1. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/uhasp/Downloads/735-1062-1-SM.pdf
Sekwo, C. (2020). Exploring the use of cohesive devices in students’ expository essays: A case study. Research Journal in Comparative Education, 1(1), 73-92.
Shahriar, A., & Pathan, H. (2012). Coherence and the Role of Cohesion in Coherent Texts. Language In India, 12(5).
Sudijono, A. (2012). Pengantar statistik pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.
Varhánek, T. (2007). Ellipsis as a means of cohesion (PhD thesis). Univerzita Pardubice. Retrieved from file:///C:/Users/uhasp/Downloads/VarhanekT_Ellipsis%20as%20a%20means_SJ_2007.pdf.
WidatAllah, H. A. Y. (2021). Problems of Using Cohesive Devices in Academic Writing among Students at Sudan University of Science and Technology (Doctoral dissertation). Sudan: University of Science & Technology. Retrieved from https://repository.sustech.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/27463/Problems%20of%20Using%20....pdf?
Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 31-48.
Zhang, (2000). Cohesive features in the expository writing of undergraduates in two Chinese universities. RELC journal, 31(1), 61-95.
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2005). Qualitative analysis of content, 1-12. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&as_sdt=0%2C5&q=Qualitative+Analysis+of+Content+by+Yan+Zhang+and+Barbara+M.+Wildemuth&btnG
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 12 times | PDF view : 4 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Published by:
Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Makassar
Jalan Bonto Langkasa, Banta-Bantaeng, Rappocini, Banta-Bantaeng, Kec. Rappocini, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90222
[email protected]
E-ISSN: 2503-2291
P-ISSN: 2303-3037
ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- 4.0 International License.