The Linguistic Features Uniqueness of the Students’ Written Discourse in Online Learning

Farida Hasan(1*), Maemuna Muhayyang(2),

(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



This research aimed at finding and describing the types and the uniqueness of linguistic features used by the students in their written discourse in The researcher applied a descriptive qualitative method. The data collection was done using document analysis in form of chat history in Whatsapp and taking ten students as the participants of this study.  The result of the analysis showed that the students used six types of linguistic features namely (1) Lexical features in terms of the use of interjection, abbreviation, word letter replacement, word combination, code switching, code mixing and diction, (2) Orthographic features in terms of word spelling and capitalization, (3) Grammatical features in terms of ellipsis, passive voice, verb use, and personal pronoun, (4) Discourse features in terms of the use of interactional features and the stream of consciousness, (5) Paralinguistic and Graphic in terms of emoticon usage and excessive punctuation and, (6) other features in terms of written out laughter . These features are unique because they are different from the standard form of the language.  It can be seen also from the use of abbreviation and ellipsis that shorten the students’ sentence, the use of emoticon representing the emotions and psychical activity, the use of lower and upper case to represent the sound and the intonation of the student’ sentence, the abandonment of convention of capitalization of proper nouns and the first words of sentences, and the creative orthography of some words. The linguistic features used by the students were different from the standard form and their function that allowed the student to express and emphasize their intention, meaning and emotion in the chat room make the students’ written discourse in online learning is unique

Keywords: uniqueness, linguistic features


uniqueness, linguistic features

Full Text:



Af Segerstad, Ylva Hård (2002). Use and Adaptation of Written Language to the Conditions of Computer-Mediated Communication. A Doctoral Dissertation Department of Linguistics, Göteborg University.

Azar, Betty Schrampfer. (2002). Understanding and Using English Grammar 3rd Edition with Answer Key. New York. Pearson Education Longman

Cambridge Advance Learner's Dictionary.2008. 3rd edition. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press.

Gay, Lorraine Rumble., Mills, Geoffrey. E., & Airasian, Peter. (2006). Educational Research : Competencies for Analysis and Applications (8 ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Grant, Leslie., & Ginther, April. (2000). Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 123-145. Using Computer-Tagged Linguistic Features to Describe L2 Writing Differences.

Haque, Nadia Tarique. (2017). GSTF Journal on Education (JEd), 4(2). Analysis of Linguistic and Discourse Features of the Essays Written for the York English Language Test.

Hezili, Amina. (2010). Communication from Formal Written Interaction to Media Written Interaction Chat. Faculty of Letters and Languages Department of Foreign Languages

Kadir, Zaemah Abdul., Maros, Marlyna., & Hamid, Bahiyah Abdul. (2012). International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(3), 276. Linguistic Features in the Online Discussion Forums.

AbuSa’aleek, Atef Odeh (2015) International Journal of English Linguistics 5 (1), 135-145, Linguistics: A Linguistic Analysis of Electronic Discourse as a New Variety of Language.

Schleppegrell, Mary J. (2001). Linguistics and education, 12(4), 431-459. Linguistic Features of the Language of Schooling.

Sindoni, Maria Grazia. (2014). Spoken And Written Discourse in Online Interactions: A Multimodal Approach: Routledge.

Stern, J. (n.d.). Introduction to Online Teaching and Learning. West Los Angeles College. Retrieved January 06, 2018, from

Tavosanis, Marko. (2006). New Text. Wikis and Blogs and other Dynamic Text Sources, 11-15. Linguistic Features of Italian Blogs: Literary Language.

Thurlow, Crispin., & Brown, Alex. (2003). Discourse Analysis Online, 1(1), 30. Generation Txt? The sociolinguistics of young people’s text-messaging.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1092 times | PDF view : 195 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

View My Stats

Published by:

Pascasarjana, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Jalan Bonto Langkasa, Banta-Bantaeng, Rappocini, Banta-Bantaeng, Kec. Rappocini, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90222
[email protected]

E-ISSN: 2503-2291

P-ISSN: 2303-3037

ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial- 4.0 International License.