The Impact of ICT Towards Saudi EFL Students’ Writing Skills: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Abdullahi Salisu Kademi(1*),

(1) English Language and Preparatory Year Institute, Royal Commission for Jubail and Yanbu, Jubail Industrial City 31961, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/eltww.v8i2.20784

Abstract


This study aimed to investigate the impact of using the word processor application on the writing achievement of Saudi EFL learners at Jubail Technical Institute. It used embedded-experimental mixed methods research design in which the qualitative data set provides an auxiliary role in a study that is primarily quantitative. Nested sampling technique was used to select participants for both the dominant quantitative and the auxiliary qualitative phases of the study. The participants were divided into two groups: the experimental group, which studied writing using the word processor, and the control group, which learnt writing using the traditional method. It was hypothesized that the experimental group participants would have a higher achievement in a writing performance test than those of the control group. After establishing that the two groups had homogenous writing abilities before the treatment, post-test results showed that the experimental group participants had a statistically significantly higher achievement in the writing performance test (t(67) = 6.21, p < .001) than the control group. The study recommended introducing computer-assisted writing programs in composition classes and training teachers on how to use such programs to help students develop their writing skills.


Keywords


computer-assisted language learning; computer-assisted writing; paper-based writing; writing performance test; word processor

Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

AbuSeileek, A. F. (2004). The effect of using a computer-based program on students’ writing ability in English (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arab University, Amman, Jordan.

AbuSeileek, A. F. (2006). The use of word processor for teaching writing to EFL learners in King Saud University. Journal of King Saud University, 19(2), 1-15.

Al-Kahtani, S. A. (2001). Computer-assisted language learning in EFL instruction at selected Saudi Arabian universities: Profile of faculty (Doctoral dissertation, Indiana University of Pennsylvania) [Abstract].

Al-Mansour, N. S., & Al-Shorman, R. A. (2012). The effect of computer-assisted instruction on Saudi University students’ learning of English. Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation, 24(1), 51-56. doi:10.1016/j.jksult.2009.10.001

Al-Zahrani, A. M. (2017). A conceptual model for the effective integration of technology in Saudi higher education systems. In Transforming education in the Gulf Region: Emerging learning technologies and innovative pedagogy for the 21st century (pp. 67-80). Routledge.

Alexander, P. A., & Singer, L. M. (2017, October 15). A new study shows that students learn way more effectively from print textbooks than screens. Retrieved February 28, 2018, from http://www.thepassivevoice.com/2017/10/a-new-study-shows-that-students-learn-way-more-effectively-from-print-textbooks-than-screens/

Aljumah, F. H. (2012). Saudi learner perceptions and attitudes towards the use of blogs in teaching English writing course for EFL majors at Qassim University. English Language Teaching, 5(1). doi:10.5539/elt.v5n1p100

Almekhlafi, A. G. (2006). The effect of computer assisted language learning (CALL) on United Arab Emirates English as a foreign language (EFL) school students' achievement and attitude. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 17(2), 121., 17(2), 121-142. Retrieved April 4, 2017.

Almenei, A. M. (2008). An investigation of the effect of computer-assisted writing instruction on EFL Saudi learners’ ability. (Unpublished master's thesis). King Saud University Saudi Arabia.

Alshahrani, K., & Cairns, L. (2017). Managing the change during e-learning integration in higher education: A case study of Saudi Arabia. In Transforming education in the Gulf region: Emerging learning technologies and innovative pedagogy for the 21st century (pp. 167-177). London: Routledge.

Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993). The word processor as an instructional tool: A meta-analysis of word processing in writing instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1), 69. doi:10.2307/1170560

Bernstein, B. (2004). The structuring of pedagogic discourse. London: Routledge.

Boudjadar, T. (2015). ICT in the writing classroom: The pros and the cons. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 4(1). doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.1p.8

Caracelli, V. J., & Greene, J. C. (1993). Data analysis strategies for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15(2), 195. doi:10.2307/1164421

Chmarkh, M. (2021). ‘Writing to learn’ research: A synthesis of empirical studies (2004-2019). European Journal of Educational Research, 10(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.1.85

Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Word processing and writing in elementary classrooms: A critical review of related literature. Review of Educational Research, 61(1), 107-155. doi:10.3102/00346543061001107

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1).

Coughlan, S. (2015). Computers 'do not improve' pupil results, says OECD - BBC. Retrieved February 23, 2017, from http://www.bbc.com/news/business-34174796

Creswell, J. W. (1994). Research design: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research.

Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative enquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. US: Sage publications Ltd.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Narrative research designs. Educational research: Planning, conducting and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research, 3, 511-550.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Steps in conducting a scholarly mixed methods study. Retrieved from digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1047&context=dberspeakers

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Editorial: Mapping the field of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3(2), 95-108. doi:10.1177/1558689808330883

Creswell, J. W., Klassen, A. C., Clark, V. L., & Smith, K. C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in health sciences. PsycEXTRA Dataset, 2094-2103. doi:10.1037/e566732013-001

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Crook, J. D. (1985). Effects of computer-assisted instruction upon seventh-grade students' growth in writing performance. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska.

Dehghani, A. P., Sadighi, F., & Seyari, A. (2015). Dative alternation: A study on Iranian children acquiring Persian as their first language. Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 2(2), 21-32.

Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methodologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Dzekoe, R. S. (2013). Facilitating revision in the English as a second language (ESL) composition classroom through computer-based multimodal composing activities: A case study of composing practices of ESL students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa State University.

Etchison, C. (1989). Computers and composition, 6(2).

Ghanizadeh, A., & Razavi, A. (2015). The impact of using multimedia in English high school classes on students' language achievement and goal orientation. International Journal of Research Studies in Educational Technology, 4(2). doi:10.5861/ijrset.2015.1183

Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (2003). The effect of computers on student writing: A meta-analysis of studies from 1992 to 2002. The Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment, 2(1).

Graham, S., Harris, K., & Hebert, M. (2011). Informing Writing: The benefits of formative assessment. A report from Carnegie Corporation of New York. (Rep.). Carnegie Corporation of New York.

Graham, S. (2016, March 1). Here's how the method of testing can change student scores. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/heres-how-the-method-of-testing-can-change-student-scores-549922

Griffiths, M. (1998). Educational research for social justice: Getting off the fence. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Grimstad, S. (2013). Business driven environmental action in agricultural based tourism micro-clusters in Norway and Australia (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of News castle.

Hassan, B. A. (1996). Word processing and quality of EFL writing: A CALL experiment. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/11810917/Word_Processing_and_Quality_of_EFL_Writing_A_CALL_Experiment

Jafarian, K., Soori, A., & Kafipour, R. (2012). The effect of computer assisted language learning (CALL) on EFL high school students’ writing achievement. European Journal of Social Sciences, 27(2), 138-148.

Jahin, J. H., & Idrees, M. W. (2012). EFL major student teachers’ writing proficiency and attitudes towards learning English. Umm Al-Qura University Journal of Educational and Psychologic Sciences, 4(1), 10-72.

Jahin, J. H. (2012). The effect of peer reviewing on writing apprehension and essay writing ability of prospective EFL teachers. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 37(11). doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n11.3

Jaradat, R. M. (2014). Students' attitudes and perceptions towards using m-learning for French language learning: A case study on Princess Nora University. International Journal of Learning Management Systems, 2(1), 33-44. doi:10.12785/ijlms/020103

Johnson, K. A. (2000). Do computers in the classroom boost academic achievement? A report of the Heritage Center for Data Analysis.

Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York: Routledge.

Mapuva, J. (2009). Confronting challenges to e-learning in higher education institutions. International Journal of Education and Development using Information and Communication Technology, 5(3), j1.

Naba'h, A. A., Hussain, J., Al-Omari, A., & Shdeifat, S. (2009). The effect of computer assisted language learning in teaching English grammar on the achievement of secondary students in Jordan. International. Arab Journal of Information Technology, 6(4), 431-439.

Owston, R. D., Murphy, S., & Wideman, H. H. (1992). The effects of word processing on students' writing quality and revision strategies. Research in the Teaching of English, 249-276.

Piper, A. (1987). Helping learners to write: A role for the word processor. ELT Journal, 41(2), 119-125. doi:10.1093/elt/41.2.119

Prensky, M. (2001a). Digital natives, digital immigrants (part 1). On the Horizon, 9(5), 1-6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424816

Prensky, M. (2001b). Digital natives, digital immigrants (part 2): Do they really think differently? On the Horizon, 9(6), 1-6. doi:10.1108/10748120110424843

Prihatin, P. N. (2012). The computer integration into the EFL instruction in Indonesia: An analysis of two university instructors in integrating computer technology into EFL instruction to encourage students' language learning engagement (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Layola University, Chicago.

Rajendran, K. (2012). Corporate governance practices and its impact on firm performance: Special reference to listed banking institutions in Sri Lanka. Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(1).

Raji, R. (2009). The effectiveness of computer assisted language learning: A case study (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Jabatan Bahasa Inggeris, Fakulti Bahasa dan Linguistik, Universiti Malaya.

Tam, M. (2000). Constructivism, instructional design, and technology: Implications for transforming distance learning. Educational Technology and Society, 3(2), 50-60.

Warschauer, M. (2010). Invited commentary: New tools for teaching writing. Language Learning and Technology, 14(1).

Warschauer, M. (1995). E-mail for English teaching: Bringing the Internet and computer learning networks into the language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 81(1), 126. doi:10.2307/329180

Warschauer, M., & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(02), 57. doi:10.1017/s0261444800012970

Yan, L., & Zancong, S. (2002). Enhancing an English writing class via integration of available technological resources. TESL Reporter, 35(1), 17-30.

Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.

Zaini, A., & Mazdayasna, G. (2015). Revision and writing quality of seventh graders composing with and without word processors. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 516-528.

Zaini, A., & Mazdayasna, G. (2015). The impact of computer-based instruction on the development of EFL learners' writing skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 516-528. doi:10.1111/jcal.12100

Zohrabi, M. (2013). Mixed method research: Instruments, validity, reliability and reporting findings. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(2). doi:10.4304/tpls.3.2.254-262


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 346 times | PDF view : 38 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

INDEXING

  

     

 

      


EDITORIAL OFFICE

ELT Worldwide: Journal of English Language Teaching

English Language Education Graduate Program, Universitas Negeri Makassar.

 

Jalan Bonto Langkasa, Banta-Bantaeng, Rappocini, Banta-Bantaeng, Kec. Rappocini, Kota Makassar, Sulawesi Selatan 90222.

E-Mail: elt.worldwide@unm.ac.id


e-ISSN: 2503-2291

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
ELT Worlwide is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.