Technological Determinism, New Literacies And Learning Process And The Impact Towards Future Learning

Harisa Mardiana(1*), Haris Kaisar Daniels(2),

(1) Universitas Buddhi Dharma
(2) Universitas Buddhi Dharma
(*) Corresponding Author



The interest of this research is to investigate technological change, new literacies and learning processes which impact future learning. With technological determinism, the members of the university need to have technological knowledge, belief of change and adopt the technology. The problem in this research is the habits in the individual who works within our campus that would not change, because with the new literacies used and introduced in communication, besides learning in using online systems will continue to be implemented.  The research sampling is conducted of 76 respondents, consisting of students, lecturers, employees, staff and technicians. And this research method uses is quantitative methods and semi-structured qualitative methods. The result obtained that there are members of campus who are willing to change in communication and the ways of thinking and acting to follow the change in future learning 4.0 industrial revolutions


Technological determinism, new literacies, social changes, new technologies, future learning

Full Text:



Adinugroho, I. (2016). Demokrasi, Kepemimpinan, dan Psikologi Moral. Buletin Psikologi Vol. 24, No. 2, 76 – 86.

Balaban-Sali, J. (2012). New Media Literacies of Communication Students. Contemporary Educational Technology , 3(4), 265-277.

Baruah, T. D. (2012). Effectiveness of Social Media as a tool of communication and its potential for technology-enabled connections: A micro-level study. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 5, 1-10.

Hauer, T. (2017). Technological determinism and new media. International Journal of English, Literature and Social Science (IJELSS), 2(2), 1-4.

Huesemann, M. H. (2003). The limits of technological solutions to sustainable development. Clean Techn Environ Policy, 5, 21-34. DOI:10.1007/s10098-002-0173-8

Hui, D. (2018). Learning from New Literacies. Learning from New Literacies, 13(2), 71-93.

Hussin, A. A. (2018). Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching. Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching, 6(3), 92-98.

Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy 5 (4), 87–88. DOI: 10.4103/0976-0105.141942.

Jamshed, S. (2014). Qualitative research method-interviewing and observation. Journal of Basic and Clinical Pharmacy 5(4), 87-88.

Leopold, T. A. (2017). Realizing Human Potential in the Fourth Industrial Revolution - An Agenda for Leaders to Shape the Future of Education, Gender and Work. Geneva, Switzerland: White Paper - World Economic Forum.

Mayes, R., Natividad, G., & Spector, J. M. (2015). Challenges for Educational Technologists in the 21st Century. Education Science, 5, 221–237.

Morrar, R., Arman, H., & Mousa, S. (2017, November ). The Fourth Industrial Revolution (Industry 4.0): A Social Innovation Perspective. Technology Innovation Management Review, 7(11), 12-20. DOI:10.22215/timreview/1117

Rosenfeld, A. (2008). Messaging the Web: Implementing an SMS System in PHP. Pensylvania:

Anderson, J., & Rainie, L. (2018, April 18). Concerns about the future of people’s well-being. Retrieved February 14, 2019, from

Dalkir, K. (2005). Knowledge Management in Theory and Practice. Oxford, UK: Elsevier Butterworth–Heinemann.

Evans, D. (2011). Introduction to Computing: Explorations in Language, Logic, and Machines pp. 2. Richmond, VA: Creative Common.

Fasouli, D. (2014). According to the theory of technological determinism, Technology Itself Can Cause Social Change, Through a Change in Communication Examining If & How Change in Technology Causes Change in Society. COM 201 INTRODUCTION TO COMMUNICATIONS.

Groshek, J., & Tandoc, E. (2016). The Affordance Effect: Gatekeeping and (Non) reciprocal Journalism on Twitter. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 201-210.

Hemsley, J., & Mason, R. M. (2013). Knowledge and Knowledge Management in the Social Media Age. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce 23:1-2, 138-167.

Hesketh, B. (2002, November 2). Technological Change in a Multicultural Context and Applied Psychology. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, 15492-15495. doi:

Knobel, M., & Lankshear, C. (2014). Studying New Literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(2), 97-101.

Kozinski, S. (2017). How generation Z is shaping the change. Retrieved February 18, 2019, from

Lall, S., & Teubal, M. (1998). Market-Stimulating" Technology Policies in Developing Countries: A Framework with Examples from East Asia. Pergamon - World Development Vol. 26, No. 8, pp 1369-1385.

Lebowitz, B. (2011, January 23). Social vs. Technological Determinism. Retrieved February 14, 2019, from

Leu, D. J.; Zawilinski, L.; Castek, J.; Banerjee, M.; Housand, B. C.; Liu, Y.; O'Neil, M.. (2007). What is new about the new literacies of online reading comprehension. Secondary School Literacy What Research Reveals for Classroom Practice, 37-68.

McKean, D. (2012). IT Strategy & Technology Innovation. BookBoon - The eBook Company.

McLuhan, M. (1967). Understanding Media: The Extension of Man. London: Sphere Books.

NLLP, N. (2016). Australian Curriculum Assessment and Reporting Authority. Retrieved February 18, 2019, from

Rushby, N. (2013). The Future of Learning Technology: Some Tentative Predictions. Educational Technology & Society, 16 (2), 52-58.

Schwab, K. (2015). The Fourth Industrial Revolution - What It Means and How to Respond. Davos, Switzerland: Snapshot.

Schwarzenegger, C. (2017). Book Review - Technological determinism and social change: Communication in a tech-mad world. SAGE Journal, 19 ( 5), 797-799.

Thitivesa, V. (2017, August 30). Technological Determinism & Social Media. Retrieved February 14, 2019, from

UNESCO. (2017). What UNESCO does on technology policy and planning for education. Washington D.C.:

Veblen, T. (2013). The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study in the Evolution of Institutions pp. 77-87. The USA: Macmillan.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 289 times | PDF view : 3 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Harisa Mardiana

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Educational Science and Technology
Graduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar


address icon red

 Jalan Bonto Langkasa Gunungsari Baru Makassar, 90222 Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD Ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia | 
   085299898201 (WA) 

EST Index by: