Exploring The Potential of Microlearning for Toefl Ibt Preparation Among High School Students

Muhammad Faizal Rizky(1), Nurhikmah H(2*), Farida Febriati(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar, ID Scopus :57202611483
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v9i3.51107

Abstract


The aim of this needs analysis is to investigate the potential of microlearning as a learning approach to prepare high school students for the TOEFL iBT. Microlearning is an instructional method that involves brief participation in an activity that is intended to yield a specific result. While prior research has shown its benefits in encouraging independent learning, reducing mental fatigue, and preventing demotivation and cognitive impairments, most studies have focused on adult learners, with only a small fraction conducted in high school settings. In Indonesia, certificates of English aptitude tests, such as TOEFL iBT, are necessary for higher education and job applications. However, the topic and skills are rarely discussed in schools, resulting in many high school graduates being unprepared for the exam. Typically, students resort to private institutions or tutors to acquire the necessary skills, but the associated costs and time commitment can be discouraging. Therefore, it is essential to examine the perceived importance of TOEFL iBT, learning difficulties, and learning preferences. The findings will inform recommendations on integrating microlearning into the existing educational framework. Future studies should explore microlearning themes further, expand research to high school context, and explore mobile-based microlearning.


Keywords


microlearning; TOEFL iBT; high school

Full Text:

PDF

References


Al Zoubi, S. (2018). The Impact of Exposure to English Language on Language Acquisition.

Aydin, S., Denkci Akkaş, F., Türnük, T., Baştürk Beydilli, A., & Saydam, İ. (2020). Test Anxiety among Foreign Language Learners: A Qualitative Study. The Qualitative Report. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2020.4686

Buehler, F. J., Van Loon, M. H., Bayard, N. S., Steiner, M., & Roebers, C. M. (2021). Comparing metacognitive monitoring between native and non-native speaking primary school students. Metacognition and Learning, 16(3), 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09261-z

Cheng, Y. (2020). Academic self-efficacy and assessment. Educational Psychology, 40(4), 389–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2020.1755501

Cotti, C., Gordanier, J., & Ozturk, O. (2018). Class meeting frequency, start times, and academic performance. Economics of Education Review, 62, 12–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econedurev.2017.10.010

DeLoach, S. B., Kurt, M. R., & Olitsky, N. H. (2021). Duration Matters: Separating the Impact of Depth and Duration in Study Abroad Programs. Journal of Studies in International Education, 25(1), 100–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/1028315319887389

Dolasinski, M. J., & Reynolds, J. (2020). Microlearning: A New Learning Model. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 44(3), 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348020901579

Feely, A., Wall-Wieler, E., Roos, L. L., & Lix, L. (2020). Effect of Study Duration and Outcome Measurement Frequency on Estimates of Change for Longitudinal Cohort Studies in Routinely-Collected Administrative Data. International Journal of Population Data Science, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v5i1.1150

Fiani, R. G., Qirani, S. P., & Istighfarin, V. T. (2021). The Effect of Class Scheduling on The Students’ English Performance. Edulitics (Education, Literature, and Linguistics) Journal, 6(2), 84–95. https://doi.org/10.52166/edulitics.v6i2.2660

Gong, J. (2023). The Concept, Content and Implication of Krashen’s Input Hypothesis. In B. Majoul, D. Pandya, & L. Wang (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2022 4th International Conference on Literature, Art and Human Development (ICLAHD 2022) (pp. 1208–1213). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-97-8_154

Halim, N., & Ardiningtyas, S. Y. (2018). Difficulties Faced by The Students in Answering TOEFL Test Questions. ETERNAL (English, Teaching, Learning, and Research Journal), 4(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V42.2018.A7

Hall, R., & Batty, D. (2020, May 4). “I can’t get motivated”: The students struggling with online learning. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/may/04/i-cant-get-motivated-the-students-struggling-with-online-learning

Hardianto, W. T., Ferdinand, M., & Sasmito, C. (2021). Implementasi Kebujakan Rektor tentang Syarat Kelulusan dalam Menyelesaikan Studi S-1 pada Universitas Tribhuwana Tunggadewi di Kota Malang (Studi Pada Pelaksanaan TOEFL). ADMINISTRAUS - JURNAL ILMU ADMINISTRASI DAN MANAJEMEN, 5(2).

Hockings, C., Thomas, L., Ottaway, J., & Jones, R. (2018). Independent learning – what we do when you’re not there. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(2), 145–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1332031

Hoxha, M., Tafani, V., & Kennetz, K. (2020, May 31). Challenges and Impact of Teaching English in Limited Access to Technology Environment.

Hultberg, P. T., Calonge, D. S., & Choi, T. (2021). Costs and benefits of private tutoring programs: The South Korean case. International Journal of Social Economics, 48(6), 862–877. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-12-2019-0722

Huzefa, F. (2020). Implementing Flexible Curriculum: The potential opportunities and challenges in integrating online learning into teaching and learning post-COVID. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.12115.20004

Javorcik, T., & Polasek, R. (2019). Practical Application of MicroLearning in Education of Future Teachers. Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on E-Learning, 35. https://doi.org/10.34190/EEL.19.031

Kasuma, S. A. A., Akhiar, A., Haron, H., Fesal, S. N. H. S., & Kadir, N. F. A. (2021). University Students’ Perceptions of Motivation, Attitude, and Self-Efficacy in Online English Language Learning. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(4), 2763–2784. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.4.36

Kim, S. (2021). Prepping for the TOEFL iBT Writing test, Gangnam style. Assessing Writing, 49, 100544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2021.100544

Lassoued, Z., Alhendawi, M., & Bashitialshaaer, R. (2020). An Exploratory Study of the Obstacles for Achieving Quality in Distance Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(9), Article 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090232

Lee, Y.-M., Jahnke, I., & Austin, L. (2021). Mobile microlearning design and effects on learning efficacy and learner experience. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(2), 885–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09931-w

Llosa, L., & Malone, M. E. (2019). Comparability of students’ writing performance on TOEFL iBT and in required university writing courses. Language Testing, 36(2), 235–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532218763456

Magyar, A., Habók, A., & Molnár, G. (2022). Exploring the Role of English as a Foreign Language Receptive Skills and Learning Strategy Usage in the Ability to Acquire and Apply Knowledge at the Beginning of Higher Education. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 808546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.808546

Pak, K., Polikoff, M. S., Desimone, L. M., & Saldívar García, E. (2020). The Adaptive Challenges of Curriculum Implementation: Insights for Educational Leaders Driving Standards-Based Reform. AERA Open, 6(2), 233285842093282. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420932828

Park, E. E. (2022). Expanding Reference through Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning Videos. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 48(3), 102522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102522

Purnama, N. A., Rahayu, N. S., & Yugafiati, R. (2019). Students’ Motivation in Learning English. PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education), 2(4), 539. https://doi.org/10.22460/project.v2i4.p539-544

Rahma, E. A., Syafitri, R., Oktavinanda, G., Rahmatillah, R., & Syahputri, V. N. (2022). Tertiary Students’ Strategies and Difficulties in Answering the TOEFL Test. SALTeL Journal (Southeast Asia Language Teaching and Learning), 5(2), 33–37. https://doi.org/10.35307/saltel.v5i2.94

Rhinehart, L., Bailey, A., & Haager, D. (2022). Long-term English Learners: Untangling Language Acquisition and Learning Disabilities | SpringerLink. Contemporary School Psychology. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40688-022-00420-w

Sankaranarayanan, R., Leung, J., Abramenka-Lachheb, V., Seo, G., & Lachheb, A. (2023). Microlearning in Diverse Contexts: A Bibliometric Analysis. TechTrends, 67(2), 260–276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00794-x

Shaffer, R. A., & McDermott, K. B. (2020). A role for familiarity in supporting the testing effect over time. Neuropsychologia, 138, 107298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107298

Silaj, K. M., Schwartz, S. T., Siegel, A. L. M., & Castel, A. D. (2021). Test Anxiety and Metacognitive Performance in the Classroom. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1809–1834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09598-6

Sirwan Mohammed, G., Wakil, K., & Sirwan Nawroly, S. (2018). The Effectiveness of Microlearning to Improve Students’ Learning Ability. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(3), 32–38. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.415824

Smyrnova-Trybulska, E., Kommers, P., Drlík, M., & Skalka, J. (2022). Microlearning: New Approaches To A More Effective Higher Education. Springer Nature.

Sreena, S., & Ilankumaran, M. (2018). Developing Productive Skills Through Receptive Skills – A Cognitive Approach. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(4.36), 669. https://doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i4.36.24220

Surkamp, C., & Yearwood, T. (2018). Receptive Competences—Reading, Listening, Viewing. In C. Surkamp & B. Viebrock (Eds.), Teaching English as a Foreign Language (pp. 89–108). J.B. Metzler. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-476-04480-8_6

Taylor, A., & Hung, W. (2022). The Effects of Microlearning: A Scoping Review. Educational Technology Research and Development, 70(2), 363–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10084-1

Utomo, A., & Damayanti, P. (2019). Bentuk Tes TOEFL untuk Mahasiswa Universitas Kaltara: Studi Kualitatif. Muhammadiyah University Press (MUP), 20(2), 59–66.

Wege, K., Harso, A., & Wolo, D. (2022). Analysis of student learning independence during the pandemic. Journal of Research in Instructional, 2(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.30862/jri.v2i1.34


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 98 times | PDF view : 0 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Faizal Rizky, Muhammad Faizal Rizky, Dr. Nurhikmah H, Farida Febriati, Farida Febriati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Educational Science and Technology
Graduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar

   

address icon red

 Jl Bonto Langkasa Gunungsari Baru Makassar, 90222 Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD Ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia  
  jurnalestunm@gmail.com | est.journal@unm.ac.id 
  https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JEST/index 
   085299898201 (WA) 
 

EST Index by: