Supporting Students’ Basic Science Process Skills by Augmented Reality Learning Media

Tiara Lestari Paembonan(1*), Jaslin Ikhsan(2),

(1) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(2) Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta
(*) Corresponding Author



Science process skills (SPS) are one of the skills needed in the chemistry learning process, in order to gain a complete understanding of the concepts. This skills categorized into two types; basic and integrated. This research aimed to develop a product of Augmented Reality (AR) learning media then to know its feasibility, practicality, and effectiveness on students’ basic SPS on acid base learning. The research adopted Research and Development (R&D) with 4-D model consisted of define, design, develop, and disseminate stages. Questionnaire was used to measure the feasibility and practicality. Then, the obtained data were analyzed by qualitative and quantitative descriptive. In addition, SPS test was used to measure the effectiveness of AR learning media and the data were analyzed by the test of One-way ANOVA, Tukey’s Post Hoc test, and General Linear Model (GLM) Univariate. The result showed that the AR learning media is feasible, practical, and effective with big influence to support students’ basic SPS on acid base learning.


Augmented Reality; Acid Base; Guided Inquiry; Science Process Skills.

Full Text:



Akcayir, M., Akcayir, G., Pektas, H. M., & Ocak, M. A. (2016). Augmented reality in science laboratories: The effects of augmented reality on university students’ laboratory skills and attitudes toward science laboratory. Computers in Human Behavior, 57, 334-342.

Arabacioglu, S., & Unver, A. O. (2016). Supporting inquiry based laboratory practices with mobile learning to enhance students’ process skills in science education. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 15(2), 216-231. Retrieved from

Arikunto, S. (2009). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Arsyad, A. (2015). Media pembelajaran. Rajawali Press.

Azuma, R., Billinghurst, M., & Klinker, G. (2011). Special section on mobile augmented reality. Computers and Graphics, 35(4): vii-vii.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BSNP). (2010). Laporan BSNP 2010. BSNP.

Cetingul, I., & Geban, O. (2011). Using conceptual change texts with analogies for misconceptions in acids and bases. Hacettepe University Journal of Education. 41, 112-123. Retrieved from

Chen, Y. H., & Wang, C. H. (2017). Learner presence, perception, and learning achievements in augmented-reality-mediated learning environments. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(5), 695-708.

Cheng, K. H., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). Affordances of augmented reality in science learning: Suggestions for future research. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(4), 449-462.

Dell’Olio, J. M., & Donk, T. (2007). Models of teaching: Connecting student learning with standards. Sage Publication.

Dimyati & Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan pembelajaran. Rineka Cipta.

Enyedy, N., Danish, J. A., & DeLiema, D. (2015). Constructing liminal blends in collaborative augmented-reality learning environment. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(1), 7-34.

Estapa, A., & Nadolny, L. (2015). The effect of an augmented reality enhanced mathematics lesson on student achievement and motivation. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 16(3), 40-48. Retrieved from

Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed). SAGE.

Gultepe, N., Celik, A. Y., & Kilic, Z. (2013). Exploring effects of high school students’ mathematical processing skills and conceptual understanding of chemical concepts on algorithmic problem solving. Australian of Teacher Education, 38(10), 105-122. Retrieved from

Idiege, K. J., Nja, C. O., & Ugwu, A. N. (2017). Development of science process skills among Nigerian secondary school science students and pupils: An opinion. International Journal of Chemistry Education, 1(2), 13-21. Retrieved from

Irwanto., Rohaeti, E., & Prodjosantoso, A. K. (2018). Undergraduate students’ science process skills in terms of some variables: A perspective from Indonesia. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(5), 751–764.

Ko, S. M., Chang, W. S., & Ji, Y. G. (2013). Usability principles for augmented reality applications in a smartphone environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29(8), 501-515.

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Llewellyn, D. (2011). Differentiated science inquiry. Corwin.

Moeller, B., & Reitzes, T. (2011). Integrating technology with student-centered learning. Quincy, MA: Nellie Mae Education Foundation.

Munir. (2009). Pembelajaran jarak jauh berbasis teknologi informasi dan komunikasi. Alfabeta.

Osman, K. (2012). Primary science: Knowing about the world through science process skills. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 1-7.

Ozgelen, S. (2012). Students’ science process skills within a cognitive domain framework. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 8(4), 283-292.

Pekdag, B. (2010). Alternative methods in learning chemistry: Learning with animation, simulation, video and multimedia. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 7(2), 111-118. Retrieved from

Permendikbud RI 2016 No. 22. Standar proses pendidikan dasar dan menengah. [Basic and secondary education process standards].

Rezba, R. J., Sprague, C., & Fiel, R. (2003). Learning and assessing science process skills. Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co.

Richardson, J. T. E. (2011). Review: Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6(2), 135-147.

Shahali, E. H. M., & Halim, L. (2010). Development and validation of a test of integrated science process skills. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 142-146.

Sihaloho, H. W., Sahyar., & Simanjuntak, M. P. (2017). The effect of inquiry training learning model on science process skills and student learning outcomes. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(6), 46-51. Retrieved from

Singhal, S., Bagga, S., Goyal, P., & Saxena, V. (2012). Augmented chemistry: Interactive education system. International journal of Computer Applications, 49(15), 1-5.

Sirikaya, M., & Sirikaya, D. A. (2020). Augmented reality in STEM education: A systematic review. Interactive Learning Environments, 1-14.

Seetee, N., Coll, R. K., Boonprakob, M., & Dahsah, C. (2016). Exploring integrated science process skills in chemistry of high school students. Veridian E-Journal, 9(4), 247–259. Retrieved from

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Indiana University.

Wahono, R. S. (2006). Aspek dan kriteria penilaian media pembelajaran. Retrieved from

Walpole, R. E. (1995). Pengantar statistika. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Yang, S., Mei, B., & Yue, X. (2018). Mobile augmented reality assisted chemical education: Insights from elements 4D. Journal of Chemical Education, 95(6), 1060-1062.

Yakar, Z. (2014). Effect of teacher education program on science process skills of pre-service science teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(1), 17–23.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 412 times | PDF view : 3 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Tiara Lestari Paembonan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Educational Science and Technology
Graduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar


address icon red

 Jl Bonto Langkasa Gunungsari Baru Makassar, 90222 Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD Ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia | 
   085299898201 (WA) 

EST Index by: