Comparison of the Accuracy of Item Response Theory Models in Estimating Student’s Ability
(1) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(2) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(3) Universitas Negeri Jakarta
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v6i2.13295
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abadyo. (2014). Estimasi Parameter Kemampuan dan Butir Tes Matematika dengan Menggunakan Kombinasi 3PLM/GRM dan MCM/GPCM. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
Abadyo, & Bastari. (2015). Estimation of Ability and Item Parameters in Mathematics Testing By Using The Combination of 3PLM/GRM and MCM/GPCM Scoring Model. Research and Evaluation in Education Journal, 1(1), 55–72.
Almquist, B., Ashir, S., & Brännström, L. (2020). A guide to quantitative methods. Sweden: Stockholm University.
An, X., & Yung, Y. (2014). Item Response Theory : What It Is and How You Can Use the IRT Procedure to Apply It. USA: SAS Institute.
Baker, F. B., & Kim, S. (2017). The Basics of Item Response Theory Using R. New York: Springer International Publishing.
Bastari. (2015). Comparison of IRT Models that Handle Dichotomous and Polytomous Response Data Simultaneously. Unpublished Paper Work.
Borsboom, D. (2017). Educational Measurement Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisicplinary Journal. Vol 4. October https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903206097
Linden, W. J. Van Der, & R. Hambleton (2016). Handbook of Item Response Theory (Vol. 2). New York: Springer.
Creswell, J. W., & Lecompte, M. D. (2012). Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation inHigher Education. Taylor & Francis The. New York: Taylor & Francis The.
De Ayala, R. J. (2013). The theory and practice of item response theory. New York: Guilford Publications.
Demars, C. E. (2010). Item Response Theory : Understanding Statistics Measurement. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.15713/ins.mmj.3
Grunert, M. L., Raker, R., Murphy, K. L., & Holme, T. A. (2013). Polytomous versus Dichotomous Scoring on Multiple-Choice Examinations: Development of a Rubric for Rating Partial Credit. Chemimcal Education.
Ioannis, K. (2017). Calibration and Validation of Instruments measuring Academic Ability in Physics using Item Response Theory. University of Ioannina.
Kadir. (2017). Statistika Terapan. (5, Ed.) (3rd ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
Kastner, M., & Stangl, B. (2011). Multiple Choice and Constructed Response Tests : Do Test Format and Scoring Matter ? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.035
Kim, J., Madison, W., Hanson, B. A., & Mcgraw-hill, C. T. B. (2012). Test Equating Under the Multiple-Choice Model. Applied Psychological Measurement, 26(3), 255–270.
Naga, D. S. (2012). Teori Sekor pada Pengukuran Mental. Jakarta: PT Nagarani Citrayasa.
Nering, M. L., & Ostini, R. (2011). Handbook of Polytomous Item Response Theory Models. New York: Taylor & Francis.
Nurcahyo, F. A. (2016). Aplikasi IRT dalam Analisis Aitem Tes Kognitif, 24(2), 64–75. https://doi.org/10.22146/buletinpsikologi.25218
Price, L. R. (2017). Psychometric Methods Theory into Practice. New York: The Guilford Press.
Retnawati, H. (2011). Mengestimasi Kemampuan Peserta Tes Uraian Matematika Dengan Penskoran Politomus, Prosiding Semnas Matematika UNY, Mei 2011. 53–62.
Retnawati, H. (2014). Teori Respon Butir dan Penerapannya (Untuk Peneliti, Praktisi Pengukuran dan Pengujian, Mahasiswa Pascasarjana) (1st ed.). Yogyakarta: Mulia Medika. Retrieved from http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/pendidikan/heri-retnawati-dr/teori-respons-butir-dan-penerapanya-135hal.pdf
Sudaryono. (2011). Implementasi Teori Responsi Butir (Item Response Theory) Pada Penilaian Hasil Belajar Akhir di Sekolah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 17(6), 719. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v17i6.62
Suh, Y., & Bolt, D. (2010a). Nested Logit Models for Multiple-Choice Item Response Data. Psychometrika, 75(3), 454–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-010-9163-7
Suh, Y., & Bolt, D. M. (2010b). Nested Logit Models for Multiple-Choice Item Response Data. Psychometrika, (C), 454–473.
Thissen, D., & Steinberg, L. (1984). A response model for multiple choice items. Psychometrika, 49(4), 501–519. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02302588
Toit, M. du. (2013). IRT from SSI : Bilog-MG, Multilog, Parscale, Testfact. United States of America: Scientific Software International, Inc.
Van Der Linden, W. J. (2010). Item response theory. International Encyclopedia of Education, 4, 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-044894-7.00250-5
Yılmaz, H. B. (2019). A Comparison of IRT Model Combinations for Assessing Fit in a Mixed Format Elementary School Science Test. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 11(5), 539–545. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019553350
Zanon, C., Hutz, C. S., Yoo, H. H., & Hambleton, R. K. (2016). An application of item response theory to psychological test development. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-016-0040-x
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 477 times | PDF view : 1 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2020 Ilham Falani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Editorial Office
Journal of Educational Science and Technology
Graduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar
Jl Bonto Langkasa Gunungsari Baru Makassar, 90222 Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD Ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia | |||||
jurnalestunm@gmail.com | est.journal@unm.ac.id | |||||
https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JEST/index | |||||
085299898201 (WA) | |||||
EST Index by: