The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Improving Media Literacy on Different Self-Regulated Learning

Muhammad Rais(1*), Ratnawati Fadillah(2), Andi Alamsyah Rivai(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v5i3.10873

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to examine the effectiveness of learning strategies of blended and self-regulated learning and the effect of the interaction between them on media literacy skills. This study used a quasi-experimental design with a 2x2 factorial design. The research subjects consisted of 85 people (41 in control groups and 44 in experimental groups). Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA. The results showed that (1) there were differences in media literacy abilities between groups of students who were taught using blended learning strategies and groups of students who were taught using face to face learning strategies (F = 26,034; p = 0,000), (2) there were differences in media literacy abilities between groups of students who have high self-regulated learning and low self-regulated learning, (F = 7,446; p = 0.008), and (3) there was no interaction between learning methods and self-regulated learning (high and low) on literacy skills Student media (F = 0.238; p = 0.627). Descriptive statistical results indicated that the use of blended learning strategies has a better effect with an average score of 37.66 compared to face-to-face learning strategies that have a relatively smaller average score of 34.02.


Keywords


Blended Learning; Self-Regulated Learning; Media Literacy

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akgunduz Devrim, Devrim & Akinoglu, Orhan. (2016). The Effect of Blended Learning and Social Media-Supported Learning on the Students’Attitude and Self-Directed Learning Skills in Science Education. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology. 15 (2).106-115. 1

Bandura, A. (1986). Social learning Theori. Englewoods Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hals

Baran, Stanley J dan Davis, Dennis K. (2010), Teori Komunikasi Massa. Jakarta : Salemba Humanika

Bodrova, E. & Leong, D.J. (2008). Developing self-regulation in kindergaten. Beyond the Journal. NAECSinState Departement of Education.

Fan, M. S., Wu, F. T., & Wang, Y. (2017). Research on Blended Learning Model Based on Electronic Schoolbag. China Educational Technology, No. 10, 109-117

Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg, W. R. (2003). Educational research: An Introduction. Seventh Edition. Boston: Pearson Education,Inc.

Ghozali, I. (2009). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Program SPSS. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.

Graham, C. (2005). Blended learning systems: Definition, current trends, and future directions. In C. Bonk and C. Graham (Eds.). Handbook of Blended Learning:

Husamah. (2014). Pembelajaran Bauran (Blended Learning). Jakarta: Prestasi Pustaka.

Kerlinger, F. N. (2000). Asas-Asas Penelitian Behavioral. Terjemahan oleh Landung R. Simatupang. 1990. Yogyakarta: Gajah Mada University Press.

Kurtanto, Eko, & Rayandra. (2016). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning Pada Aspek Learning Design Dengan Platform Media Sosial Online Sebagai Pendukung Perkuliahan Mahasiswa. pp. 1-26.

Leana, Marilena Z,. (2016). The relationships between self-regulated learning skills, causal attributions and academic success of trainee teachers preparing to teach gifted students. Educational Research and Reviews.11 (13). 1217-1227.DOI: 10.5897/ERR2016.2818.

Lessig, Lawrence. (2011). Budaya Bebas: Bagaimana Media Besar Memakai Teknologi dan Hukum untuk Membatasi Budaya dan Mengontrol Kreativitas. KUNCI Cultural Studies Center: Jogjakarta

Luo, J. T., Sun, M., & Gu, X. Q. (2014). The Innovation Research of MOOC from the Perspective of Blended Learning: Case Study of SPOC. Modern Educational Technology, 24, 18-25.

Oesterman, M. D. (2012). Digital literacy: Definition, theoretical framework, and competencies. In M. S. Plakhotnik, S. M. Nielsen, & D. M. Pane (Eds.), Proceedings of the 11th Annual College of Education & GSN Research Conference (pp. 135-141). Miami: Florida International University. Retrieved from

Orendain, A. O. & Wood, S. (2012). An account of cognitive flexibility and inflexibility for a complex dynamic task. [Online] Available: http://act-r.psy.cmu.edu/papers/1035/paper0009.pdf (October 10, 2019)

Potter, W. (2014). Media literacy (Seventh ed.). Washington DC: SAGE

Salkind, J. Neil. 2006. Exploring research: Sixth Edition. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Sandi, G. (2012). Pengaruh Blended Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar Kimia Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 241-251.

Saritepeci, Mustafa & Cakir, Hasan. (2015). The Effect of Blended Learning Environments on Student Motivation and Student Engagement: A Study on Social Studies Course. Education and Science. 40 (177). 203-216.

Stoegler, H. & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an elementary clasroom self-regulated learning program for gifted mathematics underachievers. International Educational Journal, 6(2), 261-271. ISSN 1443-1475@2005Shannon Reseach Press.

Sungur, S & Gungoren. (2009). Effect of problem-based learning and traditional intruction on self-regulated learning. The journal of Educational Reseach, 99, 307-317.

Sutisna, A. (2016). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Blended Learning pada Pendidikan Kesetaraan Program Paket C dalam Meningkatkan Kemandirian Belajar. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 156-168.

Tamburaka, A. (2013). Literasi Media: Cerdas Bermedia Khalayak Media Massa, Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Tuckman, W. B. (1999). Conducting Educational Research: Second Edition. USA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Publisher.

Vaughan, Norman. (2014). Student Engagement and Blended Learning: Making the Assessment Connection. Education Science. 4, 247–264; doi:10.3390/educsci404024.

Vockell, Edward L. & Asher, J W. (1995). Research Educational. New Jersey Ohio: Merrill an Imprint of Prentice Hall.

Yurdakul, Bunyamin., (2014). The Effect of Blended Learning on Students’ Achievement, Perceived Cognitive Flexibility Levels and Self-Regulated Learning Skills. Journal of Education and Practice. (5) 22. 176-196.

Zimmerman, B.J. (1989). A Social Cognitive View of Self-Regulated

Zimmerman,B.J. (2004). A social cognitive view of self-regulated academic learning.Journal of Educational Psychology,4, (2), 22-63.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 213 times | PDF view : 5 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Muhammad Rais, Ratnawati Fadillah, Andi Alamsyah Rivai

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Educational Science and Technology
Graduate Program Universitas Negeri Makassar

   

address icon red

 Jalan Bonto Langkasa Gunungsari Baru Makassar, 90222 Kampus PPs UNM Makassar Gedung AD Ruang 406 Lt 4, Indonesia  
  jurnalestunm@gmail.com | est.journal@unm.ac.id 
  https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JEST/index 
   085299898201 (WA) 
 

EST Index by: