Harisa Safi(1*),

(1) PPs UNM
(*) Corresponding Author



The study aims at describing  (1) critical thinking of FIKT students (field independent with high category) students, (2) critical thinking of FDKT (field dependent with high category) students, (3) critical thinking of FIKS (field independent with medium category) students and (4) critical thinking of FDKS (field dependent with medium category) students. This study was descriptive study by employing qualitative approach. The research subjects were 4 students of class A1  of the second semester of Mathematics Education Study Program at UNM which categorized based on cognitive style by using the instrument of Group Embedded Figures Test (GEFT) and counting the IPK (Grade Point average) of mathematics courses on the first semester by differentiating two categories, namely high and medium categories, consisted of 2 field independent with high-medium category students and 2 field dependent with high-medium category students. Methods in collecting the data was critical thinking test, namely problem solving test of linear aquation systems and interviews. This study employed triangulation by comparing the data obtained through problem solving tests and interview. The result of critical thinking through problem solving was categorized based on critical thinking stage, namely clarification, analysis and solution strategy. The results of the study reveal that at the clarification stage,  the FIKT subject and FIKS subject had similarity in reading the questions briefly, understood  it directly and identifying the instructions of the questions; whereas, FDKT subject and FDKS subject read the questions repeatedly and only read instruction of the questions. At the Analysis stage,  FIKT subject and FIKS subject tended to be quick in abstracting and releting relevant information with supporting instruction of the questions, so it was quicker in concluding the method used to solve the problem. However, FDKT subject and FDKS subject tended to be longer in giving response,  so the method used was trial and error. At the solution Strategy, FIKT subject and FIKS subject applied the method used clearly and systematically; however, FIKS subject did mistake when determining k score using determinant (for the second question), unlike FDKT subject and FDKS subject which had difficulty when making conclusions based on question instruction and FDKS subject was also made mistake when determining  k score using determinant.


critical thinking, cognitive style, SPL concept

Full Text:



Akramunnisa, A. S (2017). Ability Analysis Based On Math Problem Completing The Early Math Skills And Cognitive Style On Class VIII SMPN 13 Makassar. Jurnal Daya Matematis 5 (1): 14.

Andriyani, A. & N. R. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Pada Materi Program Linear Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa 1 (1): 16–22.

Aprilia, N.C., S. Sunardi, S., & Trapsilasiwi, D. (2017). Proses Berpikir Siswa Gaya Kognitif Reflektif Dan Impulsif Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Di Kelas VII SMPN 11 Jember. Jurnal Edukasi 2 (3): 31–37.

Davidson, B. W., & Dunham R. L. (1996). Assessing EFL Student Progress in Critical Thinking with the Ennis-Weir Critical Thinking Essay Test.

Ennis, R.H. (1996). Critical Thinking Dispositions: Their Nature and Assessability. Informal Logic 18 (2).

Feng, Z. (2014). Using Teacher Questions to Enhance EFL Students’ Critical Thinking Ability. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching 2 (2).

Hamid, H. 2018. Improving Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking through Rigorous Teaching and Learning Model with Informal Argument. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 948 (January): 012047.

Handayani, W. O., & Rahaju E. B. (2018). Proses Berpikir Siswa Dalam Pengajuan Soal Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent Dan Field Independent 7 (2): 331–39.

Hidayat, A. (2017). Konsep Diri Dan Kecemasan Mahasiswa Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Bisnis Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Gaya Kognitif Field Dependent Dan Field Independent 2: 10.

Jacob, S. M., & Sam, K. H. (2008). Measuring Critical Thinking in Problem Solving through Online Discussion Forums in First Year University Mathematics. Hong Kong, 6.

Kusumaningtyas, S. L., Juniati, D., & Lukito, A. (2017). Pemecahan Masalah Generalisasi Pola Siswa Kelas VII SMP Ditinjuau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent Dan Field Dependent. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif 8 (1): 76–84.

Lestari, S., & Wijayanti, P. (2013). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Open Ended Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Matematika Siswa Dan Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin Pada Materi Kubus Dan Balok, 4.

Purnomo, R. C, Sunardi, S., & Sugiarti T. (2017). Profil Kreativitas Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Field Independent (FI) Dan Field Dependent (FD) Siswa Kelas VIII A SMP Negeri 12 Jember. Jurnal Edukasi 4 (2): 9–14.

Retnowati, D., Sujadi,I., & Subanti, S. (2016). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas XI Farmasi Smk Citra Medika Sragen Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika.” Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika 4 (1).

Rifqiyana, L. (2015). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dengan Pembelajaran Model 4K Materi Geometri Kelas VIII Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Siswa. PhD Thesis, Universitas Negeri Semarang.

S. M. Jacob and H. K. Sam, ed. 2008. International Multi Conference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, IMECS AENG International Conference on Software Engineering. Lecture Notes in Engineering and Computer Science. Hong Kong: IAENG.

Sulistyorini, Y., Argarini D. F., & Yazidah I. N. (2018). Analisis Kesalahan Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Kombinatorika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif” 7 (1): 10.

Syahbana, A. (2012). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP Melalui Pendekatan Contextual Teaching and Learning. EDUMATICA| Journal Pendidikan Matematika 2 (01).

Vendiagrys, L., Junaedi, I. (2015). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Soal Setipe TIMSS Berdasarkan Gaya Kognitif Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Model Problem Based Learning. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research 4 (1).

White, D. A. (2010). Through Another’s Eyes: Gifted Education: Thinking (With Help from Aristotle) about Critical Thinking. Gifted Child Today 33 (3): 14–19.

Zannah, N. & Andriani, S. (2017). Karakteristik Intuisi Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Matematika Ditinjau Dari Gaya Kognitif Dan Perbedaan Gender. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 1:111–119.

Zulfaneti, Edriati, S., & Mukhni. (2018). Enhancing Students’ Critical Thinking Skills through Critical Thinking Assessment in Calculus Course. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 948 (January): 012031.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 169 times | PDF view : 29 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Harisa Safi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.



Magister Program of Mathematics Education

prostgraduate Universitas Negeri Makassar


Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by





 Creative Commons License
daya matematis: jurnal inovasi pendidikan matematika is licensed under a

View My Stats