Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X.3 SMAN 1 Belopa pada Materi Pokok Ikatan

Tutiana Tutiana(1), Muharram Muharram(2*), Halimah Husain(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.35580/chemedu.v3i1.32496

Abstract


This study is a descriptive research which aimed to find out the misconceptions study on chemical bond. The samples in this research is the class X.3 SMA Negeri 1 Belopa as much 36 students. The data was collected by instrument which has 20 items two-tier multiple choice, observation page for teacher, student, and study source and interview to identified cause of misconception. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistic method to obtain percentage of the misconceptions in each item. There is six subconcept that analyzed. The result of this research showed that percentage misconceptions of students average to learning of chemical bond is 11,29 % and low category. Percentage misconceptions of students to element preference to stable is 18,52%; draw of Lewis structure is 9,26%; formation of ion bond is 11,11%; formation of covalent bond is 15,00 %; formation of covalent coordination is 13,89%. The result research show that misconception causes by, 1) teacher not give detailed explanation and 2) student is praconception is wrong

Keywords


Misconceptions,Chemical Bond,Two-tier Multiple Choice

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abraham, M.R., Grzybowski, E.B., Renner, J. & Marek, E.A. 1992. Understanding and Misunderstanding of Eight Grades of Five Chemistry Concept in Text Book. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. 29(12)

Berg, V.D.E. 1991. Miskonsepsi Fisika dan Remediasi. Salatiga:Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.

Chang, Raymond.2004. Kimia Dasar Konsep-Konsep Inti Edisi Ketiga Jilid 1. Jakarta:Erlangga

Duit, R and Treagust, D.F. 1995. Students’ Conceptions and Constructivist Teaching Approaches. Chicago: The National Society for the Study of Education.

Gillis. David. 2001. Prinsip-Prinsip Kimia Modern Edisi Keempat Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Nakhleh, M. 1992. Why Some Students Don't Learn Chemistry. Journal of Chemical Education. 3(69).

Suparno, Paul 2005. Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Konsep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: PT.Grasindo.

Tekkaya, Ceren. 2002. Misconceptions as Barrier to Uderstanding Biology. Journal of Hacattepe Universitesi Egitim Fakultasi Dergisi, Vol.23.

Tan, K.D., dkk. 2005. The Ionization Energy Diagnostic Instrument: a Two-Tier Multiple Choice Instrument to Determine High School Students’ Understanding of Ionization Energy. Chemistry Education Research and Practise, 6(4), 180-197

Treagust, D.F. 2006. Diagnostic Assessment in Science as a Means to Improving Teaching, Learning and Retention. Journal of Science and Mathematics Education Centre, Curtin University of Technology, Australia. D.F.Treagust@curtin.edu.au


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 170 times | PDF view : 58 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


website statistics View My Stats