COMPARATIVE COOPERATIVE LEARNING MODEL OF JIGSAW II TYPE AND NHT TYPE IN SOCIAL ARITHMETIC LEARNING AT GRADE VII STUDENTS OF SMP NEGERI I MAKASSAR

Ruslan Ruslan(1*),

(1) UNM
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jds.v1i2.3573

Abstract


This research is quasi experiment which is aimed to know whether there is difference of learning result of social arithmetic of students taught by cooperative learning model type Jigsaw II and result of learning of social arithmetic of student taught by using cooperative learning model of NHT type on Students of Class VII of SMP Negeri I Makassar. The result of the research shows that: (1) the learning result of the students taught by using cooperative learning type Jigsaw II model reaches 100% learning completeness, the students get the value with the average score of 84.67, (2) the students' learning result which is taught by using the model NHT type cooperative learning reaches completeness 100% of students get grades with an average score of 78.67, (3) student activity both taught using cooperative learning model type Jigsaw II even NHT during meetings in a certain time is effective, (4) Cooperative students on both cooperative types used in effective learning, and (5) student responses to positive learning. Likewise, the results of inferential statistical analysis indicate that there are significant differences between the scores of student learning outcomes taught by cooperative learning model type Jigsaw II and score of student learning outcomes are taught with NHT type for social arithmetic subject, so from the results of this study can be concluded that the model Cooperative learning type jigsaw II and type of NHT differ significantly, and can be used as one of the learning model that can improve student learning outcomes, especially for the material of arithmetic of socio-students at grade VII SMP and equal

Keywords


Cooperative Learning type Jigsaw; Cooperative Learning type NHT

Full Text:

PDF PDF

References


Anonim. 2008. Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw II. Online (http://P4tkmatematika.com/web/indeks.php?option=com-content&task=view&id=139&itemid=69). Paket Penataran. Diakses tanggal 16 januari 2009

Abdurrahman, Mulyono. 1999. Pendidikan Bagi Anak-anak Berkesulitan Belajar. kerjasama. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arends, Richard . 2000 . Learning to Teach Fifth Edition . New York: McGrow-Hill Companies,Inc.1221 Avenue of the America.

Arends, Richard, 2008. Learning To Teach, Belajar Untuk Mengajar. Pustaka Pelajar. Celeban Timur UH III/548 Yokyakarta.

Budi Santosa. 2005. Analisis Statistik dengan Microsoft Excel & SPSS.Yokjakarta : Andi Yokjakarta.

Dahar, Willis Ratna. 1998. Teori-teori belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Djadir, 2005. Studi Eksplorasi Keterlaksanaan Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Menggunakan Model Kooperatif Tipe STAD di SMP. Jurnal Ilmu Kependidikan. Makassar: Lembaga Penjamin Mutu pendidikan (LPMP) Sulawesi Selatan.

Djawa Djong, Kristiforus. 2006. Pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD untuk Pokok Bahasan Sistim Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel di Kelas VIII SMK St Theresia Kupang. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (MATHEDU). Surabaya: UNESA.

Hudojo, H. 2005. Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang

Ibrahim, dkk ,2001. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: UNESA –Universitas Press.

Isakandar, 2007. Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD untuk Pokok SubBahasan Volume Benda Ruang di Kelas X SMA. Jurnal Pendididkan Matematika (MATHEDU). Surabaya. UNESA.

Muhammad Nur. 2005. Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: UNESA. 2001. Pengajaran Berpusat Kepada Siswa dan Pendekatankonstruktivisme Dalam Pengajaran. Surabaya: UNESA-Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Muhkal, Mappaita: 1994. Hubungan Antara Konsep Diri Matematika dan Motivasi Berprestasi Dengan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa-siswa Kelas I SMA Negeri di Kota Madya Ujung Pandang. Tesis PPs IKIP Malang

Nurdin. 2007. Model Pembelajaran Matematika yang Menumbuhkan Kemampuan Metakognitif Untuk Menguasai Bahan Ajar. Disertaasi PPS Universitas Negeri Surabaya.

Salama, Umi. 2008. Berlogika dengan Matematika 1. Solo: PT Tiga Serangkai Pustaka Mandiri.

Suradi, 2005. Interaksi Siswa SMP Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika Secara Kooperatif. Disertasi PPS Universita Negeri Surabaya.

Slameto, 2003. Belajar dan Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Suherman, Herman, dkk. 2003. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA.

Trianto. 2007. Model-model Pembelajaran Inovatif Berorientasi Konstruktivisme. Jakarta: Perestasi Pustaka.

Tiro, Muhammad Arif, 2007. Dasar-dasa Stattistika (cetakan ketujuh). Makassar: Badan penerbit Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Analisis Korelasi dan Regresi Edisi kedua. Makasar: Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Skem, Richard.1982. The Psychology of Learning Mathematics. Cetakan ke enam. Great Britain: Hazell Walcon & viney Ltd


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 163 times | PDF view : 51 times PDF view : 58 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Ruslan Ruslan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Publisher:

Master Program of Mathematics Education

Graduate Program of Universitas Negeri Makassar

[email protected]

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika Indexed by:

 

 

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License..

View My Stats