Executive Functioning Learning Design and Profile of Pancasila Students Through Debate Via Whatsapp

Benny Yodi(1*),

(1) SMA Katolik Santu Petrus Pontianak, Kalimantan Barat, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


This research was conducted to develop a learning system design that is able to integrate the executive functioning (EF) of students' (mindset and skill set aspects) in growing the Pancasila Student Profile (PPP) through a dynamic scientific debate process through discussion via Whatsapp (WA). The topic of debate raised is about the pros and cons of developing nuclear power plants in West Kalimantan. This development research adopts a simple form of the Successive Approximation Model.The principle of the learning is collaborative-partnership. This activity is carried out in six stages, namely the visitation approval from the National Nuclear Energy Agency of Indonesia, consolidation of science subject teachers, planning activities, conducting virtual visits, conducting nuclear debates, and making report articles. Instruments for assessing debate and identification of EF in PPP have been designed for nuclear debate activities in 12 grades of natural science program. EF component analysis shows that for each debate phase, at least two aspects of the mindset and two aspects of the skill set are identified. This shows that the nuclear debate process via WA is able to raise and train students' EF, which is reflected in the confirmation of the PPP dimension elements. Discussions through WA can increase knowledge, confidence, and considering important details in conversation documentation. Presenting a diverse metacognitive environment in the classroom besides being able to treat student boredom, it can also train students' shifting to adapt to new/different learning conditions.

Keywords


debate; executive functioning; Pancasila students profile; whatsapp

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, C. A., Acquah, S., & Esia-Donkoh, K. (2021). A Comparative Study of SAM and ADDIE Models in Simulating STEM Instruction. African Educational Research Journal, 9(4), 852–859.

Allen, M. (2021). SAM: The Successive Approximations Model. Allen in Interaction.

Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kemdikbud RI. (2020). Kajian Pengembangan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (1st ed.). Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan dan Perbukuan Kemdikbud RI.

Bakshi, S. G., & Bhawalkar, P. (2017). Role of whatsapp-based discussions in improving residents’ knowledge of post-operative pain management: A pilot study. Korean Journal of Anesthesiology, 70(5), 542–549. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2017.70.5.542

Bensalem, E. (2018). The Impact of WhatsApp on EFL students’ Vocabulary Learning. Arab World English Journal, 9(1), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no1.2

Butler, R. (2019). Improve executive function skills for all. Education in Chemistry.

Dawson, P., & Guare, R. (2014). Interventions to promote executive development in children and adolescents. In S. Goldstein & J. A. Naglieri (Eds.), Handbook of Executive Functioning (pp. 427–443). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8106-5_24

Egilman, D. S. (2013). The importance of scientific debate. International Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health, 19(3), 157–159. https://doi.org/10.1179/1077352513Z.00000000076

Foster, M. (2021). How the COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts Students ’ Working Memory and Executive Functioning. Remedy Health Media.

Grasha, A. F. (2002). Teaching with Style: A Practical Guide to Enhancing Learning by Understanding Teaching and Learning Styles. Alliance Publishers.

Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). In Sage (2nd ed.). Sage.

Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). PLS-SEM: Indeed a silver bullet. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 19(2), 139–152. https://doi.org/10.2753/MTP1069-6679190202

Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review, 26(2), 106–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128

Maske, S. S., Kamble, P. H., Kataria, S. K., Raichandani, L., & Dhankar, R. (2018). Feasibility, effectiveness, and students’ attitude toward using WhatsApp in histology teaching and learning. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 7, 158. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_30_18

Noone, C., Bunting, B., & Hogan, M. J. (2016). Does mindfulness enhance critical thinking? Evidence for the mediating effects of executive functioning in the relationship between mindfulness and critical thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 6(JAN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02043

Opfermann, M., Schmeck, A., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). Multiple Representations in Physics and Science Education – Why Should We Use Them? In Multiple Representations in Physics Education (pp. 1–22). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58914-5_1

Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2022). SmartPLS.

Sawuwu, B. Y. (2018). Taksonomi Keterampilan Pengajuan Masalah Kimia: Eksplorasi Metakognisi Mahasiswa dalam Keterampilan Pengajuan Masalah Kesetimbangan Kimia. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Schreiber, J. B., Stage, F. K., King, J., Nora, A., & Barlow, E. A. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6), 323–338. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338

Sites, R., & Green, A. (2014). Leaving ADDIE for SAM Field Guide: Guidelines and Templates for Developing the Best Learning Experiences. American Society for Training & Development.

Taber, K. S. (2009). Learning at the Symbolic Level. In J. K. Gilbert & D. Treagust (Eds.), Multiple Representations in Chemical Education, Models and Modeling in Science Education (pp. 75–105). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_5

Tang, K. S., Delgado, C., & Moje, E. B. (2014). An integrative framework for the analysis of multiple and multimodal representations for meaning-making in science education. Science Education, 98(2), 305–326. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21099

Thorp, H. H. (2021). Public debate is good for science. In Science (Vol. 371, Issue 6526, p. 213). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abg4685

Wang, Y.-S., Li, H.-T., Li, C.-R., & Wang, C. (2014). A model for assessing blog-based learning systems success. Online Information Review, 38(7), 969–990. https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2014-0097


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 103 times | PDF view : 13 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.