Perbedaan Kesesuaian Nilai Terhadap Perilaku Memilih pada Mahasiswa

Muh. Khaidir(1*), Lukman Lukman(2), Kurniati Zainuddin(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jtm.v3i1.46464

Abstract


Voting behavior is behavior that is carried out consciously to support or not support one party or candidate in political contestation. Participation in voting is low because of the lack of an information base and a candidate's vision and mission that is in accordance with the interests of the community. This study aims to determine how much environmental values match the voting behavior of students at Universitas Negeri Makassar. This study uses a between subject experimental design with a general election simulation design. The participants in this study were 60 students who were then divided into the experimental group, 30 students who joined the nature lover's organization and the control group, 30 students who did not join the nature lover's organization. Test the hypothesis in this study using Chi Square Test. The results showed that there were differences in the choices of students (nature lovers and non-nature lovers) towards the choice of candidates who had pro-environment values as well as economic and Pancasila values (p = 0.001). Individuals who refer to environmental values, prefer candidates who have pro environmental values. Likewise, individuals who refer to more diverse values prefer candidates who have economic and Pancasila values.


Keywords


Students; values; Voting behavior

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aguilar-Luzón, M. C., Carmona, B., Calvo-Salguero, A., & Castillo Valdivieso, P. A. (2020). Values, Environmental Beliefs, and Connection With Nature as Predictive Factors of the Pro-environmental Vote in Spain. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(June), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01043.

Ali, M.F. (2020). Golput menang di pilwali Makassar, bagaimana daerah lain di sulsel ?. https://makassar.tribunnews.com/2020/12/20/golput-menang-di-pilwali-makassarbagaimana-daerah-lain-di-sulsel. Di akses pada 27 Desember 2021.

Apaut, Y., Bainus, A., & Kartini, D.S. (2018). faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku memilih pemula pada pemilihan kepala daerah kabupaten Ngada tahun 2015. Jurnal Teropong Aspirasi Politik Islami, 14(2), 66–91. https://doi.org/10.24042/tps.v14i2.3167.

Cervinka, R., Roderer, K., & Hefler, E. (2011). are nature lovers happy ? on various indicators of well-being and connectedness with nature. Journal of Health Psychology, 17(3), 379–388. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110101176.

CNN. (2019). https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20190404174723-32-383507/survei-pemilu-milenial-golput-diprediksi-di-atas-40-persen. Di akses pada 18 Januari 2022.

Daud, M. (2015). prediktor perilaku pemilih pada pemilukada: perspektif psikologi politik. Talenta, 3(7), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.26858/talenta.v1i1.5235.

Evelina, L. W., & Angeline, M. (2015). Upaya Mengatasi Golput pada Pemilu 2014. Humaniora, 6(1), 97–105. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v6i1.3302.

Hakim, M. A., & Soetjipto, H. P. (2014). Nilai dan afiliasi partai politik. Wacana Jurnal Psikologi, 6(11), 35–54. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.13057/wacana.v6i1.3.

Lay, C. (2007). Nilai strategis isu lingkunugan dalam politik Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 11(2), 153–286. https://doi.org/10.22146/jsp.10994.

Munawarah, R. & Kristanto, A.A. (2022). Alienasi pemuda dalam politik: peran nilai dan kepercayaan politik pada partisipasi politik pemilih pemula. Psikoborneo, 10(1), 32-50. doi: 10.30872/psikoborneo.

Pahlevi, M. E. T., Khalyubi, W., & Khatami, M. I. (2019). Persepsi Pemilih Milenial Dalam Pemilu Serentak 2019 Di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Jurnal Adhyasta Pemilu, 6(2), 99–114.

Purnamasari, D. (2018). Gelombang golput yang tak pernah surut. https://tirto.id/gelombang-golput-yang-tak-pernah-surut-cVnc. Di akses pada 27 Desember 2021.

Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., & Vecchione, M. (2010). Basic Personal Values, Core Political Values, and Voting: A Longitudinal Analysis. Political Psychology, 31(3), 421–452. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00764.x

Wibisono, S. (2021). Identitas sosial dan perilaku politik. Dalam Yustisia, W., Hakim, M.A., & Ardi, R. (Ed), Psikologi Politik (hlm. 113-144) Jakarta: Kompas.

Yustiningrum, R. E., & Ichwanuddin, W. (2015). Partisipasi Politik dan Perilaku Memilih pada Pemilu 2014. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 12(1), 117–135. https://doi.org/10.14203/jpp.v12i1.533.

Yustisia, W. (2021). Pengantar psikologi politik. Dalam Yustisia, W., Hakim, M.A., & Ardi, R. (Ed), Psikologi Politik (hlm. 1-32) Jakarta: Kompas.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 48 times | PDF view : 17 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Muh. Khaidir, Lukman Lukman, Kurniati Zainuddin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




Published by:

Fakutas Psikologi Universitas Negeri Makassar

Office:

Gedung BM, LT 2 Fakultas Psikologi, Kampus Gunung Sari baru. Jalan A.P Pettarani, Kota Makassar Propinsi Sulawesi Selatan, Pos 90222.