Social Dynamics in Public Administration: A Case Study of Local Government

A. Octamaya Tenri Awaru

doi:10.26858/jiap.v14i1.62755

Social Dynamics in Public Administration: A Case Study of Local Government

A. Octamaya Tenri Awaru^(1*),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v14i1.62755

Abstract

This study explores the social dynamics within public administration through a case study of local government in Indonesia. The research aims to understand how social interactions, relationships, and structures influence the effectiveness and efficiency of public administration at the local level. Utilizing a qualitative approach, data were collected through interviews, observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that social dynamics, including community engagement, leadership styles, and inter-departmental cooperation, significantly impact policy implementation and public service delivery. Additionally, the study highlights the importance of social capital in fostering collaboration and trust among stakeholders. The implications of these findings suggest that local governments should prioritize social dynamics in their administrative processes to enhance governance outcomes. This research contributes to the broader discourse on the interplay between sociology and public administration, offering insights for policymakers and practitioners in Indonesia and beyond.

Keywords

ocial dynamics; Public administration; Local government; Indonesia; Policy implementation

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amsler, L. B., & O’Leary, R. (2017). Collaborative public management and systems thinking. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6–7), 626–639. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-07-2017-0187

Arkorful, V. E., & Lugu, B. K. (2023). Understanding Rate Evasion Behavior in Local Governance: Application of an Extended Version of the Theory of Planned Behaviour. Public Organization Review, 23(3), 1035–1054. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00561-1

Bano, M. (2019). Partnerships and the Good-Governance Agenda: Improving Service Delivery Through State–NGO Collaborations. Voluntas, 30(6), 1270–1283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9937-y

Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International journal of social research methodology, 24(6), 641–654.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Devonish, D., Alleyne, P., Charles-Soverall, W., Marshall, A. Y., & Pounder, P. (2010). Explaining entrepreneurial intentions in the Caribbean. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 16(2), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552551011027020

Doyle, M. (1995). Organizational transformation and renewal: A case for reframing management development? Personnel Review, 24(6), 6–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483489510097912

Elia, G., Margherita, A., & Passiante, G. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship ecosystem: How digital technologies and collective intelligence are reshaping the entrepreneurial process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150(September 2019), 119791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119791

Garcia-Sanchez, I. M., Cuadrado-Ballesteros, B., & Frias-Aceituno, J. (2013). Determinants of Government Effectiveness. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(8), 567–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2013.772630

Getie, A. M., Birhanu, T. A., & Dadi, T. T. (2023). Rural cadastral implementation and its effect on women’s landholding use rights in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Land Use Policy, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106556

Hattab, S., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Daswati, D., & Niswaty, R. (2022). The effect of toxic leadership on turnover intention and counterproductive work behaviour in Indonesia public organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2021-0142

Kumar, S., & Pal, S. K. (2014). Empirically developed integrated ICT framework for PDS in developing countries. 2013 3rd World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies, WICT 2013, 234–239. https://doi.org/10.1109/WICT.2013.7113141

Lal, S., Gleeson, J., Rivard, L., D’Alfonso, S., Joober, R., Malla, A., & Alvarez-Jimenez, M. (2020). Adaptation of a Digital Health Innovation to Prevent Relapse and Support Recovery in Youth Receiving Services for First-Episode Psychosis: Results From the Horyzons-Canada Phase 1 Study. JMIR Formative Research, 4(10), e19887. https://doi.org/10.2196/19887

Lu, W., Chau, K. W., Wang, H., & Pan, W. (2014). A decade’s debate on the nexus between corporate social and corporate financial performance: A critical review of empirical studies 2002-2011. Journal of Cleaner Production, 79, 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.072

Lyu, Y., Peng, Y., Liu, H., & Hwang, J.-J. (2022). Impact of Digital Economy on the Provision Efficiency for Public Health Services: Empirical Study of 31 Provinces in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 5978. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19105978

Martín-Rojas, R., García-Morales, V. J., Garrido-Moreno, A., & Salmador-Sánchez, M. P. (2020). Social Media Use and the Challenge of Complexity: Evidence from the Technology Sector. Journal of Business Research. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.12.026

Méndez Juez, M. (2022). Intermunicipal Cooperation. In Local and Urban Governance: Vol. Part F20 (hal. 101–125). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-14804-0_5

Morse, R. S. (2010). Integrative public leadership: Catalyzing collaboration to create public value. Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.004

Öktem, K. G., & Erdogan, C. (2020). Between welfare state and (state-organised) charity: How Turkey’s social assistance regime blends two competing policy paradigms. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(3–4), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2018-0217

Prawoto, N., Purnomo, E. P., & Zahra, A. A. (2020). The Impacts of Covid-19 Pandemic on Socio-Economic Mobility in Indonesia. VIII(3), 57–71.

Purwanto, A., Sušnik, J., Suryadi, F. X., & de Fraiture, C. (2018). Determining strategies for water, energy, and food-related sectors in local economic development. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 16, 162–175. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2018.08.005

Ragazou, K., Passas, I., & Sklavos, G. (2022). Investigating the Strategic Role of Digital Transformation Path of SMEs in the Era of COVID-19: A Bibliometric Analysis Using R. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811295

Sacchetti, S., & Ianes, A. (2023). Practices and history of “co-programmazione” and “co-progettazione” in Italy: the case of cultural production and music education in Trentino. Social Enterprise Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-12-2022-0120

Santoso, R. S., Rostyaningsih, D., & Lestari, H. (2021). Public Policy Analysis: Problem Exploration and Recommendation to Public Service Innovation in Surakarta City Government. ICISPE 2020, October 09-10.

Sátyro, N. G. D., & Cunha, E. S. M. (2014). The Path of Brazilian Social Assistance of Institutions and Ideas. Brazilian Political Science Review, 8(1), 80–108.

Sosiologi, J. (2019). Terminal Barang Internasional (TBI) dalam Konteks Pembangunan Ekonomi Masyarakat di Perbatasan Entikong, Indonesia-Malaysia Nikodemus Niko. Indonesian Journal of Religion and Society, 01(02), 104–114. https://doi.org/10.36256/ijrs.v1i2.65

Tallontire, A., Opondo, M., & Nelson, V. (2014). Contingent spaces for smallholder participation in GlobalGAP: Insights from Kenyan horticulture value chains. Geographical Journal, 180(4), 353–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12047

Taneo, S. Y. M., Hadiwidjojo, D., Sunaryo, S., & Sudjatno, S. (2020). Creative destruction and knowledge creation as the mediation between innovation speed and competitiveness of food small and medium-sized enterprises in Malang, Indonesia. Competitiveness Review, 30(2), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-12-2017-0090

Tangi, L., Benedetti, M., Gastaldi, L., Noci, G., & Russo, C. (2020). Mandatory provisioning of digital public services as a feasible service delivery strategy: Evidence from Italian local governments. Government Information Quarterly, 101543. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101543

Tien-Dung, P., Nguyen, X.-D., & Das, S. (2022). Sustainable Goal Achievement by Digital Revolution During and After Pandemic; How Much One Wins and Losses: A Bird’s Eye View for Future Planning. In Sustainable Development and Innovation of Digital Enterprises for Living with COVID-19 (hal. 133–147). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-2173-5_8

Vargas-Payera, S., Martínez-Reyes, A., & Ejderyan, O. (2020). Factors and dynamics of the social perception of geothermal energy: Case study of the Tolhuaca exploration project in Chile. Geothermics, 88, 101907. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2020.101907

Yap, & Ng, X. H. (2018). (2018). Decentralization and centralization “Governing the activation of social assistance recipients in Europe.” The Eletronic Library, 34(1), 1–5.

Yi, Q., Zhu, X., & Liu, X. (2014). An exploration of the conditions required of social organizations to be contracted by government as service providers: A study based on analysis of local government documents. China Nonprofit Review, 6(2), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.1163/18765149-12341277