Performance of the Regional Innovation Laboratory in Improving the Quality of Makassar City Government

Ali Mardana; Risma Niswaty; Anshari Anshari; Dian Meiliani Yulis

doi:10.26858/jiap.v13i1.45030

Performance of the Regional Innovation Laboratory in Improving the Quality of Makassar City Government

Ali Mardana⁽¹⁾, Risma Niswaty⁽²⁾, Anshari Anshari⁽³⁾, Dian Meiliani Yulis^(4*),

(1) DPRD Kota Tual
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(4) Politeknik Kesehatan Megarezky
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v13i1.45030

Abstract

This research is a descriptive study using a qualitative approach. With data collection techniques used are observation techniques, interviews, and documentation. The technique of checking the validity of the data used is the triangulation technique. The data analysis technique used in this study is an interactive model. The results of the study show that the performance of the Partnership-Based Innovation Laboratory (Labinov Beken) has been able to improve the quality of Makassar City Government well, but still needs improvement in supporting its implementation. This is reflected in the input indicators owned by the Partnership-Based Innovation Laboratory (Labinov Beken) which have been good in terms of Human Resources, Financial, and existing regulations that have supported the implementation of this Labinov Beken. When viewed in terms of output indicators, Labinov Beken has given birth to various regional innovations, but there are still Regional Innovation Programs that have not run optimally. In terms of outcome indicators (outcomes), Labinov Beken has been able to provide service satisfaction to the community and accelerate the economy and increase development in the Makassar City Region. Besides that, from the indicators of benefits (benefits), Labinov Beken has provided benefits as a vehicle for stimulating the atmosphere for the birth of innovations that can overcome obstacles to the implementation of programs and activities. Then in terms of impact indicators (impacts), Labinov Beken has had a positive impact with the birth of various regional innovations that have the potential to advance the quality of government, but there is still a negative impact because a small number of ASN are unable to adapt to changing their work style following the development of existing innovations.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Aarøe, L., Baekgaard, M., Christensen, J., & Moynihan, D. P. (2021). Personality and Public Administration: Policymaker Tolerance of Administrative Burdens in Welfare Services. Public Administration Review, 81(4). https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13381

Abdullah, M. T., Supriyono, B., Muluk, M. R., & Tjahjanulin, T. (2018). Innovation Typology of the Local Government in Educational Affairs. BISNIS & BIROKRASI: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Dan Organisasi, 23(2).

Agus, A., Dhahri, I., & Niswaty, R. (2019). Based Waste Management Innovation Design of Industrial 4.0 in Makassar City. International Conference on Social Science 2019 (ICSS 2019).

Arhas, S. H., & Suprianto, S. (2019). The Effectiveness of 6M Implementation at Artebo MSME. Jurnal Ad’ministrare: Jurnal Pemikirian Ilmiah Dan Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran, 6(2).

Bastian, I. (2006). Akuntansi Sektor Publik. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Bircan, İ., & Gençler, F. (2015). Analysis of Innovation-Based Human Resources for Sustainable Development. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1348–1354. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.321

Cavalcante, P., & Camões, M. (2017). Do the Brazilian innovations in public management constitute a new model? RAI Revista de Administração e Inovação, 14(1), 90–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rai.2016.07.001

Castelli, C. (2012). Innovation. In The Global Governance of Knowledge Creation and Diffusion. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813683-14

Chen, J., Walker, R. M., & Sawhney, M. (2020). Public service innovation: a typology. Public Management Review, 22(11). https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2019.1645874

Committee, I. T., Matolo, R. S., Mccormick, D., Orero, R., Behrens, R., Ommeh, M., Ngui, S. K., WAMALWA & Wario, Gicheru, et, Al., Work, D., Enabling, M., Environment, P., Development, M., Hassan, K., Sam, A., Machuve, D., Mwendwa, J. K., Chumba Joseph, Mitullah, B. W. V, … Deakin, S. (2013). Work Injury Benefits Act. 97th Annual Meeting Transportation Research Board, 2(1).

Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of Qualitative Research (Fourth Edition). SAGE Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.

Díaz, M. L. A., Ordoñez, F. A. R., & Muñoz, R. A. T. (2020). Open innovation and public policies in developing countries. International Journal for Quality Research, 14(3). https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR14.03-09

Gil, O., & Zheng, T. C. (2015). Smart cities through the lenses of public policy: The case of Shanghai. Revista Espanola de Ciencia Politica, 1(38).

Glor, E. D. (2021). A Nomenclature And Classification System For Antecedents Of Public Policy Innovation Trailblazing And Adoption Derived From A Systematic Literature Review – Iii. Innovation Journal, 26(2).

Leckel, A., Veilleux, S., & Dana, L. P. (2020). Local Open Innovation: A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.119891

Lima, I., Marques, C., Moraes, R., Sarmento, V., & Carvalho, Z. (2018). The Public Policy Strategies Fostering Smart Cities. 2017 IEEE 1st Summer School on Smart Cities, S3C 2017 - Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1109/S3C.2017.8501409

Mauro, T. G., & Borges-Andrade, J. E. (2020). Human resource system as innovation for organisations. Innovation and Management Review, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-03-2019-0037

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. A. (2012). Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. In Universitas Indonesia_UI Press.

Pangaribuan, I. H., Sailan, M., Aslinda, A., & Saleh, S. (2022). Implementation of Education Affirmation Policies in World Universities.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 38 Tahun 2017 tentang Inovasi Daerah, (2017).

Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.

Sinha, S. K., & Verma, P. (2020). Impact of sales Promotion’s benefits on perceived value: Does product category moderate the results? Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52, 101887. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101887

Sourdin, T., Li, B., & McNamara, D. M. (2020). Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy and Technology, 9(4), 447–453. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020

Sun, Y., Kuai, R., Xiao, S., Tang, W., & Li, X. (2020). VIMAC: Vehicular information medium access control protocol for high reliable and low latency transmissions for vehicular ad hoc networks in smart city. Future Generation Computer Systems, 106, 55–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2019.12.041

Syam, H., Akib, H., Patonangi, A. A., & Guntur, M. (2018). Principal Entrepreneurship Competence Based on Creativity and Innovation in the Context of Learning Organizations in Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(3), 1–13.

Syarifuddin, H. M., Tahir, H., Akib, H., & Rusdi, M. (2021). Innovation of Electronic Licensing Information System at the Office of Investment and One Stop Integrated Services (DPMPTSP) of Bone Regency. Jurnal Office, 7(1), 169–182.

Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2014 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah, (2014).

Uyarra, E., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., Flanagan, K., & Magro, E. (2020). Public procurement, innovation and industrial policy: Rationales, roles, capabilities and implementation. Research Policy, 49(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103844

Ziadi, A. R., Supriyono, B., & Wijaya, A. F. (2016). The Effectiveness of Information System in Public Complaint Service: An Implementation of E-Government based on Jakarta Smart City Applications. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: A Administration and Management, 16(8), 53–57.