Multimodal Feedback on speaking: Effectiveness and Students’ Perspective
(1) University of Bengkulu
(2) University of Bengkulu
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/eralingua.v5i2.18193
Abstract
Abstract. Multimodal feedback needs to be studied and researched to enhance student’s ability. Thus, this research aims to examine the feedback which using technology and conventional without using technology in speaking, wanted to explore how multimodal feedback could influence the students’ speaking ability, know the student’s perception on multimodal feedback and the reason multimodal feedback could improve students’ speaking ability. The research used a sequential mixed method design with test and interview as instruments. The sample was 54 students for experimental and control group. The result showed that there is not significant different between multimodal feedback with using technology and without using technology. However, in terms of mean score, multimodal feedback with using technology is higher than multimodal feedback without using technology on improving students’ speaking ability. Another result showed that the students had positive response towards the use of multimodal feedback on learning speaking because it can give them much knowledge and upgrade their ability in speaking class.
Keywords: Multimodal feedback; using technology; speaking ability
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alghazo, K., Abdelrahman, M. B., & Qbeitah, A. A. (2009). The effect of teachers’ error feedback On AL-Hussein Bin Talal University students’ self- correction ability. European Journal of Social Sciences, 12(1), Retrieved from https://scholar. google.co.id/scholar
Asnawi., Zulfikar, T., Astila, I. (2017). Students’ perception of oral corrective feedback in speaking class. English Education Journal (EEJ). 8(3), 275-291.
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., Walker, D. A., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to research in education. Measurement (8th ed., Vol. 4). USA: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Bartels, N. (2003). Written peer response in L2 writing. English Teaching Forum. 4(1), 34-37.
Bing-Jie, G.U. (2016). Is recast the most effective type of corrective feedback? Under cognitive and sociolinguistic approach. Sino-US English Teaching. 13(4), 284-291. https://doi:10.17265/1539-8072/2016.04.006
Campbell, B.S & Feldmann, A. (2017). The power of multimodal feedback. Journal of Curriculum Teaching, Learning, and Leadership in Education. 2(2), 1-6.
Chekol, A.D. (2020). Investigating the Influence of Using Peer Feedback on EFL Students’ Speaking Achievement and Their Perceptions Towards Peer Feedback. Arabic Language, Literature & Culture. 5(3), 23-34. https://doi: 10.11648/j.allc.20200503.11
Creswell, J.W. (2015). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method. Sage Publication.
Dewi, D.S. (2015). Corrective feedback in speaking class. Journal Anglo-Saxon. VI (8), 3-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.33373/anglo.v6i2.352
Fadilah, A.E., Anugerahwati., Prayogo, J.A. (2017). EFL students’ preferences for oral corrective feedback in speaking instruction. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora. 5(2), 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um030v5i22017p076
Faharani, A.K. K. & Salajegheh, S. (2015). The effect of different feedback types on L2 speaking skill: A comparison of Iranian EFL teachers’ and learners’ perceptions. Modern Research Studies. An International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences. 2(1), 22-50. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001
Laeli, A. F., & Setiawan, S. (2019). Oral corrective feedback in speaking class: Its frequency , students’ perception and preference. Exposure: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris: Exposure. 8(2), 257-269. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v8i2.2785
Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (2013). Counterpoint Piece: The Case for Variety in Corrective Feedback research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35(1), 167- 184. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226311200071X
Khunaivi, H., & Hartono, R. (2015). Teacher’s and student’s perception of corrective feedback in teaching speaking. English Education Journal. 5(2), 14-20
Mahdi, D., & Saadany, N.E. (2013). Oral feedback in the EFL Classroom. Malmo Hogskola, Fakulteten for Larande Och.
Morua, G. (2016). The effects of oral expression teachers’ feedback on improving learners’ speaking performance. Thesis. University of Biskra.
Muhsin, M.A. (2016). The effectiveness of positive feedback in teaching speaking skill. Lingua Cultura. 10(1), 25-30. https://doi.org/ 10.21512/lc.v10i1.873
Muyashoha, A. B., & Sugianto, A. (2019). The students’ perception towards oral corrective feedback in speaking class. Proceedings of 3rd INACEL (International Conference on English Language Teaching). 3(3), 14-29.
Nemari, M., Alavi, S,M., Mohebbi, H., Masjedlou, A.P. (2017). Speaking out on behalf of the voiceless learners: Written corrective feedback for English Language learners in Iran. Issues in Educational Research. 27(4). 822-839.
Ningkrum, C.A.K. (2019). Oral corrective feedback on students’ speaking performance in EFL classes. Unpublished Thesis. Faculty of Language and Arts. Universitas Negeri Semarang.
Panneerselvam, R. (2014). Research methodology. New Delhi: PHI Learning.
Phuong, T.T.B. & Huan N.B. (2018). Teacher corrective feedback on students’ speaking performance and their uptake in EFL classes. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. 3(3), 110-131. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v0i0.1823
Putri, E.K. (2018). Lecturer corrective feedback in speaking class at English Department of Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. Published Thesis. Department of English Education, School of Teacher Training and Education, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.
Siska, W., Mukhaiyar., & Ratmanida. (2018). Engliah teachers’ strategies in giving oral corrective feedback on students’ speaking performance. Proceedings of the sixth International Conference on English Language and Teaching (ICOELT-6). 6(1), 158-168.
Syafryadin, S. (2020). The effect of talking chips technique toward the improvement of students’ speaking achievement at one of the senior high schools in Bandung. Linguists: Journal Of Linguistics and Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ling.v6i2.2776
Syafryadin, S., Martina, F., & Salniwati, S. (2020). Compensation strategies in speaking activities for non-English department students: poor and competent speakers. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 109-116. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.819
Syafryadin, S. (2020). Students’ Strategies in learning speaking: experience of two Indonesian schools. Vision: Journal for Language and Foreign Language Learning, 9(1), 33-46. https://doi.org/10.21580/vjv9i14791
Tesnim, O. (2019). Oral corrective feedback and its impact on learners’ speaking skills: Tunisian EFL students as a case study. International Journal of Language and Linguistics. 7(3), 138-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.11648/j.ijll.20190703.15
Tseng, S-S., & Yeh, H-C. (2019). The impact of video and written feedback on student preferences of English speaking practice. Language Learning & Technology. 3(2), 145-158. https://doi.org/10125/44687
Vries, B.W.P., Cucchiarini, C., Strik, H., Hout, R.V. (2019). Spoken grammar practice in CALL: The effect of corrective feedback and education level in adult L2 learning. Language Teaching Research. Sage. 24(5), 714-735. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818819027
Walgito, B. (2004). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: ANDI
Wang, B., Yu, S., Teo, T. (2018). Experienced EFL teachers’ beliefs about feedback on student oral presentations. Asian –Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 3(12), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-018-0053-3
Zhai, K., & Gao, X. (2018). Effects of corrective feedback on EFL speaking task complexity in China’s university classroom. Cogent Education. 5(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1485472
Zohrabi, K., & Ehsani, F. (2014). The role of implicit & explicit corrective feedback in Persian speaking efl learners’ awareness of and accuracy in English Grammar. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 98, 2018-2024. https://doi.org 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.637
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 741 times | PDF view : 1 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Eralingua has been indexed by:
