Determinant Factor of Transformational Leadership in the Age of Globalization

Rajamemang Rajamemang(1*), Tahir Kasnawi(2), Anshari Anshari(3), Fakhri Kahar(4), Rusdi Maidin(5),

(*) Corresponding Author



This study aims to determine the supporting and inhibiting factors of Transformational Leadership in the Age of Globalization. The research location was conducted at Bosowa University. The technique of collecting data uses observation, interviews, FGD. Data analysis techniques use the theories of Miles, Huberman and Saldana (2014). The results of the study show that the determinant factors in this study can be seen from two factors: university supporting factors and inhibiting factors. Supporting factors: it has been illustrated that the Chancellor as a leader has a network that has been developed both at the local, regional, national and international levels. Furthermore, it is supported by adequate learning process facilities. So as to be able to compete with other universities in Indonesia. The inhibiting factors are the availability of limited teaching staff.


Determinant Factor; Globalization; Development.

Full Text:



Adams, A. (2011). Mapping a strategic approach to HR leadership. Strategic HR Review, 11(1), 31–36.

Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2015). The downside of transformational leadership when encouraging followers to network. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 790–801.

Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 746–771.

Cetin, M. O., & Kinik, F. S. F. (2015). An Analysis of Academic Leadership Behavior from the Perspective of Transformational Leadership. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 207, 519–527.

Falk, I. (2013). Designing effective leadership interventions: a case study of vocational education and training. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(4), 193–203.

Hetland, J., Hetland, H., Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2018). Daily transformational leadership and employee job crafting: The role of promotion focus. European Management Journal, 36(6), 746–756.

Kragt, D., & Guenter, H. (2018). Why and when leadership training predicts effectiveness: The role of leader identity and leadership experience. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39(3), 406–418.

Li, W.-D., Arvey, R. D., Zhang, Z., & Song, Z. (2012). Do leadership role occupancy and transformational leadership share the same genetic and environmental influences? The Leadership Quarterly, 23(2), 233–243.

Mac Ruairc, G. (2013). Leadership, capacity building and school improvement: concepts, themes and impact. Taylor & Francis.

Maheshwari, S. K., & Yadav, J. (2019). The role of HR in leadership development. Development and Learning in Organizations: An International Journal.

Mascia, A., Dal Pubel, L., & Sartori, M. (2013). A vision of effective leadership: An Italian perspective. In Advances in Educational Administration: Vol. 20. Collective Efficacy: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Leadership (pp. 12–215).

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. In CA, US: Sage Publications.

Nasila, J. W., & Akib, H. (2014). Participative leadership of village head based local wisdom" H4" in district. Suwawa, Bolango Bone Regency, Gorontalo province Indonesia. Global Journal of Business, Economics and Management, 4(1), 29–36.

Organizational Effectiveness. (2013). Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 34(1), 98–100.

Phaneuf, J.-É., Boudrias, J.-S., Rousseau, V., & Brunelle, É. (2016). Personality and transformational leadership: The moderating effect of organizational context. Personality and Individual Differences, 102, 30–35.

Saggaf, M. S., Akib, H., Salam, R., Baharuddin, A., & Kasmita, M. (2018). The Quality Analysis Of Academic Services.

Saggaf, M. S., & Salam, R. (2017). Examining Academic Service using Importance Performance Analysis (IPA).

Saggaf, S., Salam, R., Kahar, F., & Akib, H. (2014). Pelayanan Fungsi Administrasi Perkantoran Modern. Jurnal Ad’ministrare, 1(1), 20–27.

Salam, R. (2015). Penerapan Fungsi Administrasi Perkantoran Modern berbasis Daya Saing Organisasi dalam menyongsong MEA 2015. SEMINAR NASIONAL “Revolusi Mental Dan Kemandirian Bangsa Melalui Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dalam Menghadapi MEA 2015” Himpunan Sarjana Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1, 186–190.

Salam, R., & Rosdiana. (2016). Penerapan Fungsi Administrasi Perkantoran Modern Berbasis Daya Saing Organisasi dalam Menyongsong MEA 2015. SEMINAR NASIONAL “Revolusi Mental Dan Kemandirian Bangsa Melalui Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Dalam Menghadapi MEA 2015” Himpunan Sarjana Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Indonesia, 1(2016), 186–190. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Makassar.

Taylor, S., Pearse, N., & Louw, L. (2013). Development of a philosophy and practice of servant leadership through service opportunity. Proceedings of the European Conference on Management, Leadership & Governance.

van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., de Windt, N., & Alkema, J. (2014). Same difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 544–562.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 467 times | PDF view : 142 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Ad'ministrare

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.