Confinement of Pregnant Women for Protection of the Unborn

Chris O. Abakare

doi:10.26858/pdr.v1i1.20004

Confinement of Pregnant Women for Protection of the Unborn

Chris O. Abakare^(1*),

(1) Department of Philosophy, Nnamdi Azikiwe University, Ifite Road, 420110, Awka, Anambra State, Nigeria
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/pdr.v1i1.20004

Abstract

The conflict between the rights of women and unborn take an ugly turn when one speaks of confinement of women for protection of their foetuses. The very thought seems perverse because we delve into the negative aspect of the rights discourse - rights are in modern times used as weapon to correct moral depravity. The relationship between the mother and her foetus, particularly the aspect of maternal care towards the unborn is more a matter of course than rights’. Thus, in case of pregnant women-foetal relationship, what essentially was a part of maternal responsibility and innate to motherhood gets reduced to rights and becomes a matter of legal duty rather than a moral responsibility. From the moral-philosophical perspective, it may be viewed as a debasement of the relationship from both sides - the mother refuses to alter her lifestyle of addiction for the sake of the unborn upon which the latter is up in arms against the former with the charge of abuse. This work maintains that the rights discourse is ill equipped to understand the problem, as law cannot be perceived as the panacea of all ills.

Keywords

Confinement; Pregnant women; foetal relationship.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Behera, C., Sikary, A. K., Krishna, K., Garg, A., Chopra, S., & Gupta, S. K. (2016). Medico-legal autopsy of abandoned foetuses and newborns in India. The Medico-Legal Journal, 84(2), 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/0025817216631456

Briggs, G. G., & Roger, K. (2012). Freeman, and Sumner J. Yaffe. Drugs in pregnancy and lactation: a reference guide to fetal and neonatal risk. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 7, 19-25.

Chavkin, W. (1990). Drug addiction and pregnancy: policy crossroads. American Journal of Public Health, 80(4), 483-487.

Chavkin, W. (1991). Mandatory treatment for drug use during pregnancy. JAMA, 266(11), 1556-1561.

Edozien, L. C., & O'Brien, P. S. (Eds.). (2017). Biopsychosocial Factors in Obstetrics and Gynaecology. Cambridge University Press.

Finn, L. (1998). ‘It’s for (y)our own good: an analysis of the discourses surrounding mandatory, unblinded HIV testing and newborns’. Journal of Medical Humanities, 19(2-3), 133–62.

Gal, P., & Sharpless, M. K. (1984). Fetal drug exposure—Behavioral teratogenesis. Drug intelligence & clinical pharmacy, 18(3), 186-201.

Garcia, S. A., & Batey, R. (Eds.). (1991). Children and Families (Vol. 1). Classics in the History of Eco.

Gies, L. (2000). Contesting the Rule of Emotions? The Press and Enforced Caesareans. Social & Legal Studies, 9(4), 515-538.

Goodwin, M. (2014). Fetal protection laws: Moral panic and the new constitutional battlefront. Calif. L. Rev., 102, 781.

Herbert, B. (1998). ‘Foetal Protection Conceals Real Agenda’. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel 12(1).

Higgins, T. (1990). Rethinking (M) otherhood: Feminist Theory and State Regulation of Pregnancy. Harv. L. Rev., 103, 1325.

Lehman, A. F., Myers, C. P., & Corty, E. (2000). Assessment and classification of patients with psychiatric and substance abuse syndromes. Psychiatric Services, 51(9), 1119-1125.

Logli, P. A. (1990). Drugs in the womb: The newest battlefield in the war on drugs. Criminal Justice Ethics, 9(1), 23-29.

Losco, J., & Shublak, M. (1994). ‘Paternal-Foetal Conflict: An Examination of Paternal Responsibilities to the Foetus’, Politics and the Life Sciences (3)1.

McBride, J. (2018). Human rights and criminal procedure: The case law of the European Court of Human Rights. Council of Europe.

Mishkin, D. B., & Povar, G. J. (1993). Decision making with pregnant patients: a policy born of experience. The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement, 19(8), 291-302.

Neustadter, R. (1994). Fetal Attraction: Legal, Ethical, and Sociological Considerations in the Criminalization of Pregnancy. Journal of Crime and Justice, 17(2), 107-131.

Pedain, A. (2003). Review of Rights, Duties and the Body. Law and Ethics of the Maternal-Foetal Conflict, Cambridge Law Journal, 2(3).

Priaulx, N. (2015). Pre (natal) crime: pregnant women, substance abuse and the law. Medico-Legal Journal, 83(1), 43-46.

Raitt, F., & Zeedyk, S. (2020). The implicit relation of psychology and law: Women and syndrome evidence. Routledge.

Robertson, J. A. (1983). Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Virginia Law Review, 405-464.

Romero-Gonzalez, B., Puertas-Gonzalez, J. A., Mariño-Narvaez, C., & Peralta-Ramirez, M. I. (2020). Confinement variables by COVID-19 predictors of anxious and depressive symptoms in pregnant women. Medicina Clinica. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2020.10.002

Scott, R. (2002). Rights, duties and the body: law and ethics of the maternal-fetal conflict. Hart Publishing.

Sichel, D. L. (2007). Giving birth in shackles: A constitutional and human rights violation. Am. UJ Gender Soc. Pol'y & L., 16, 223.

Silverman, J. G., Raj, A., Mucci, L. A., & Hathaway, J. E. (2001). Dating violence against adolescent girls and associated substance use, unhealthy weight control, sexual risk behavior, pregnancy, and suicidality. jama, 286(5), 572-579.

Smith, E., Sundstrom, B., & Delay, C. (2020). Listening to women: Understanding and challenging systems of power to achieve reproductive justice in South Carolina. Journal of Social Issues, 76(2), 363-390.

Thompson, E. L. (1988). The Criminalization of Maternal Conduct During Pregnancy: A Decisonmaking Model for Lawmakers. Ind. LJ, 64, 357.

Thornton, T. E., & Paltrow, L. (1991). The rights of pregnant patients: Carder case brings bold policy initiatives. Healthspan, 8(5), 10-16.