Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

Linguistics; phonology, morphology, syntax, discourse analysis, psycholinguistics, sociolinguistics, and critical discourse analysis

Literature: local literature studies, oreign literature studies with local literature, children local literature, local literature studies for character education, and other local literature studies.

Indonesian Linguistics and Literature: curriculum development local languages and literature, learning methods of local languages and literature, learning materials of local languages and literature, learning media of local languages and literature, assessment of local languages and literature, local languages and literature learning across curricula, information and communications technology in local language learning, language skills, and other local anguage learning analyses.

The editorial board would like to receive manuscripts submitted via online submission system. Authors hoping to publish research in this journal should make sure that the manuscripts meet the scope and submission guidelines of the journal. For more detailed information, please refer to the terms and conditions of PANRITA: Jurnal Bahasa Daerah, Sastra Daerah, dan Pengajarannya.

 

Fokus dan Lingkup Jurnal

Ilmu bahasa: fonologi, morfologi, sintaksis, analisis wacana, psikolinguistik, sosiolinguistik, dan analisis wacana kritis 

Sastra: studi sastra daerah, studi sastra asing kaitannya dengan sastra daerah, sastra daerah untuk anak-anak, studi sastra untuk pendidikan karakter, dan studi sastra daerah lainnya.

Bahasa dan Sastra Daerah: pengembangan kurikulum bahasa daerah, metode pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra daerah, materi pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra daerah, media pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra daerah, penilaian dalam pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra daerah, pembelajaran bahasa daerah lintas kurikulum, teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra daerah, keterampilan bahasa dan sastra daerah, dan analisis pembelajaran bahasa dan sastra daerah lainnya.

Dewan editorial ingin menerima naskah yang dikirimkan melalui sistem pengiriman online. Penulis berharap untuk mempublikasikan penelitian dalam jurnal ini harus memastikan bahwa naskah memenuhi ruang lingkup dan pedoman penyerahan jurnal. Untuk informasi lebih lanjut, silakan merujuk pada syarat dan ketentuan PANRITA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Daerah serta Pembelajarannya.

 

Section Policies

Articles

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

Manuscripts sent to PANRITA undergo two review processes. Papers are first screened by the editors to ensure that the submission guidelines have been met. If a submission passes through the first review process, it will be assigned to reviewers while for those which do not pass the process will be returned to the authors. 

Each article is reviewed by two independent reviewers through a blind review process. Reviewers would evaluate the manuscript substances, including the research originality, novelty, methodology, and contribution to science. Reviewers are responsible to make a decision on the article status based on the results of the evaluation. If reviewers do not agree each other, the editors would ask the third reviewer’s opinion. The results of the review would be sent by the editors back to the author with a note (one of the following): accepted without revision, accepted after major revision, accepted after minor revision, rejected. 

The review process until final decision lasts within 4-8 weeks. However, the review process may take longer depending on the reviewers’ responses and the review cycle. Manuscripts sent back to PANRITA after revision can be reassigned to the reviewers according to the reviewers’ availability, editors’ decision, and the number of revisions to be made.

 

Kebijakan Peninjauan

Naskah yang dikirim ke PANRITA melalui dua proses peninjauan. Artikel pertama kali ditinjau oleh tim editor untuk memastikan bahwa tulisan telah sesuai pedoman penulisan. Jika pengajuan melewati proses peninjauan pertama, maka akan dilanjutkan untuk peninjau berikutnya, tetapi jika tidak lulus di tim editor, maka artikel akan dikembalikan ke penulis.

Setiap artikel ditinjau oleh dua pengulas independen. Peninjau akan mengevaluasi substansi naskah, termasuk originalitas penelitian, kebaruan, metodologi, dan kontribusi untuk ipteks. Peninjau bertanggung jawab untuk membuat keputusan tentang status artikel berdasarkan hasil evaluasi artikel. Jika peninjau tidak setuju satu sama lain, maka tim editor akan meminta pendapat pengulas ketiga. Hasil ulasan akan dikirim oleh editor kembali ke penulis dengan catatan (salah satu dari yang berikut): diterima tanpa revisi, diterima setelah revisi besar, diterima setelah revisi kecil, ditolak.

Proses peninjauan sampai keputusan akhir berlangsung dalam 4--8 minggu. Namun, proses peninjauan mungkin memakan waktu lebih lama tergantung pada tanggapan pengulas/peninjau dan siklus peninjauan. Naskah dikirim kembali ke PANRITA setelah revisi artikel dapat dipindahkan ke pengulas sesuai ketersediaan pengulas, keputusan editor, dan jumlah revisi yang akan dibuat.

 

Publication Frequency

Jurnal Panrita terbit tiga kali setahun

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration

 

Publication Ethic

PANRITA: Jurnal Bahasa daerah, sastra daerah, dan Pengajarannya 

publication ethics refer to Cope of Publication Ethic (COPE) set by Lembaga Ilmu Pengetahuan Indonesia (LIPI) through Peraturan Kepala LIPI Number 5 Year  2014 on Scientific Publication Ethics. COPE contracts all parties involved in PANRITA manuscript publication processes: publisher, editors, reviewers, and authors. COPE PANRITA concerns three principles underlying scientific publication ethics, including (1) neutrality, i.e. free from conflict of interests, (2) fairness, i.e. provision of authors’ rights, and (3) honesty, i.e. free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism.  

In relation to COPE LIPI (Peraturan Kepala LIPI Number 5 Year 2014 on Scientific Publication Ethics), there are four pillars of scientific publication that need to be referred to: (1) practices related to publisher tasks, that include establishing policy and publication programs, facilitating editors and reviewers work, respecting editors and reviewers decision, as well as determining sponsors and selecting the third parties. In publication practices, publisher is obliged to guarantee submissions which comply with the Scientific Publication Ethics as a whole. In terms of sponsorship, publisher needs to make sure that sponsors and the third parties do not complicate rewards and influence journal policy and programs; (2) practices associated with editors tasks, that include making a decision related to the publication of the manuscript, regulating reviews of the manuscript, as well as assuring the fairness of the results of the manuscript reviews, the confidentiality of the content, and protecting it from manuscript manipulation. (3) practices related to reviewers tasks, that include reviewing manuscripts either openly or in private, checking the accuracy and the authenticity of data sources, references, and concepts, as well as the objectivity of the content, and performing a neutral review. (4) practices related to authors tasks, that are to examine practices related to authors tasks including the authority of the manuscript, the statement of the originality of the manuscript, the detection of the manuscript duplication possibility, the acknowledgement of sponsorship, authority statements, and the statement of the sources of research funding.

Followings are rules and responsibilities of the publisher, editors, reviewers, and authors in details. 

General Duties and Responsibilities of the Publisher 

  1. Determine journal name, scopes, and accreditation status when necessary
  2. Select editorial board members
  3. Define the relationship between publisher, editors, reviewers and other parties involved in the contract
  4. Appreciate confidentiality for contributing researchers, authors, editors, and reviewers
  5. Apply norms and conditions related to intellectual richness, especially copyright
  6. Do review the journal policy and deliver it to the authors, editorial board, reviewers, and readers
  7. Establish a guide to ethics for the editors and reviewers
  8. Publish journal articles regularly
  9. Ensure the availability of sponsorship for journal publication
  10. Build cooperation and marketing networks
  11. Prepare permissions and other legal aspects

  General Duties and Responsibilities of the Editors

  1. Meet the needs of readers and authors
  2. Seek to improve the sustained quality of the publication
  3. Apply processes to ensure the quality of the published manuscripts
  4. Put forward freedom to express opinions objectively
  5. Maintain the integrity of authors’ academic tracks  
  6. Submit corrections, clarifications, withdrawals, and apologies when necessary
  7. Be responsible for the manuscript styles and format; however, the content and all statements are authors’ responsibility
  8. Actively ask for opinions from the authors, reviewers, and members of the editorial board to enhance the quality of the publication
  9. Encourage assessment for findings published in the journal
  10. Support the initiative to reduce research and publication errors by requesting authors to attach Ethical Clearance form which has been approved by the Ethical Clearance Commission
  11. Support the initiative to educate researchers about publication ethics
  12. Review the effects of publication policy on authors and reviewers’ attitudes to promote responsibility and minimize errors
  13. Be open minded towards new ideas or perspectives that might contradict their own
  14. Make objective decisions by avoiding being persistent to particular opinions (of editors, of authors, or of third parties
  15. Encourage authors to revise manuscripts until they are published

General Duties and Responsibilities of the Reviewers

  1. Review manuscripts assigned by the editors and send the results back to them as the consideration for publication
  2. Review manuscripts within the given time and according to the submission guidelines and scientific publication principles (data collection method, authors legality, conclusion, etc.)
  3. Re-review manuscripts which have been revised by the authors based on the predetermined standards
  4. Encourage authors to revise manuscripts by providing critiques, suggestions, and recommendations
  5. Keep the authors’ privacy by not publishing the results of the review, suggestions, and recommendations  
  6. Do not review manuscripts written by themselves, both directly and indirectly

General Duties and Responsibilities of the Authors 

  1. Make sure that the criteria of an author have been met
  2. Be responsible collectively for the content of the manuscripts including method, analysis, discussion, and details
  3. Mention research resources (including funding) both from direct and indirect supports 
  4. Explain research limitations 
  5. Provide feedback to the results of the review on time and professionally 
  6. Inform the editors about a manuscript withdrawal 
  7. Appreciate requests from the publisher for not publishing findings through interviews or other media before the manuscripts are published 
  8. Inform the editors about manuscripts that belong to a longitudinal, multidisciplinary study (or written from different perspectives) 

 

 

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

 

Plagiarism

Manuscripts submitted to PANRITA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Daerah serta Pembelajarannya must be free from plagiarism, fabrication, and falsification. Authors are required to use an application for plagiarism check. The similarity level of a submission must be under five percent. To avoid plagiarism, authors need to quote from other parties. Auto-plagiarism is also forbidden.

Authors need to send an article along with the declaration that it has not published and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The form can be downloaded in Declaration Form.

Before accepted, the manuscript is tested plagiarism using grammarly applications that are accessed online https://www.grammarly.com
https://turnitin.com

 

Plagiarisme

Naskah yang dikirim ke PANRITA: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra Daerah serta Pembelajarannya harus bebas dari plagiarisme, pemalsuan, dan pemalsuan. Penulis diminta untuk menggunakan aplikasi untuk pemeriksaan plagiarisme. Tingkat kesamaan pengajuan harus di bawah lima persen. Untuk menghindari plagiarisme, penulis perlu mengutip dari pihak lain. Plagiarisme otomatis juga dilarang.

Penulis perlu mengirim artikel bersama dengan deklarasi yang belum dipublikasikan dan tidak dipertimbangkan untuk dipublikasikan di tempat lain. Formulir dapat diunduh dalam Formulir Pernyataan.

Sebelum diterima, manuskrip ini diuji plagiarisme menggunakan aplikasi grammarly yang diakses online https://www.grammarly.com
https://turnitin.com