EFL Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions on Written Corrective Feedback during Blended Learning

Firmansyah Firmansyah(1), Maemuna Muhayyang(2*), Muh. Tahir(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


This study aims to determine EFL students’ and teachers’ perceptions on written corrective feedback (WCF) during blended learning. Interviews, and focus group discussions (FGD) were the instruments used in this study. The researchers used a descriptive qualitative methodology for the research design of this study. Two English teachers and eight students in the IX grade for the academic year 2022–2023 served as the study's subjects. They were selected through a purposive sampling technique. The findings showed that the implementation of WCF was perceived positively and negatively by the EFL students at SMP Negeri 3 Galesong Selatan. The students who had favourable opinions reported that the implementation of WCF was motivating, interesting, and useful. Meanwhile, the students with negative perceptions confirmed that they were demotivated because they had to clarify the WCF provided by the teachers. Further, the EFL teachers also had favourable opinions of WCF as it applied to students in blended learning. They argued that WCF was important, motivating, and helpful for students to recognize their errors. In summary, the researchers concluded that both EFL students and teachers at SMP Negeri 3 Galesong Selatan had favourable perceptions of WCF implementation during blended learning.


Keywords


Perception; written corrective feedback; blended learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aji, W. K., Ardin, H., & Arifin, M. A. (2020). Blended learning during pandemic corona virus: Teachers’ and students’ perceptions. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 8(2), 632-646.

Akrim, A., & Sulasmi, E. (2022). Student Perception of Cyberbullying in Social Media. Aksaqila Jabfung, 12(1), 323–333.

Alkhatib, N. (2015). Written corrective feedback at a Saudi university: English language teachers’ beliefs, students’ preferences, and teachers’ practices (Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex).

Amalia, H., Abdullah, F., & Fatimah, A. S. (2021). Teaching writing to junior high school students: A focus on challenges and solutions. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 17(S2), 794-810.

Amidon, Edmund J. (1967). The Role of the Teacher in the Classroom: A manual for understanding and improving teachers’ classroom behavior. Association for Productive Teaching. New York.

Ariiyani, Yuseva, R. (2016). Written Corrective Feedback in Writing Class. Jurnal Penelitian. Volume 20, No. 1, November 2016, p.8.

Ariiyanti, A., & Fitriana, R. (2017). EFL students’ difficulties and needs in essay writing. Advances in Social Science, Education, and Humanities Research (ASSEHR), 158, 111-121.

Bitchener, J., & Storch, N. (2016). Written corrective feedback for L2 development. Multilingual Matters.

Boyd, N. (2021). Self-Perception Theory: Definition and Examples. Directly retrieved from https://study.com/academy/lesson/self-perception-theory-definition-and-examples.html#:~:text=Self%2Dperception%20theory%20states%20that,between%20facial%20expressions%20and%20emotions.

Budiana, H., & Mahmud, M. (2020). Indirect Written Corrective Feedback (WCF) In Teaching Writing. Academic Journal Perspective: Education, Language, and Literature, 8(1), 60-71.

Casanave, C. P. (2019). Does writing for publication ever get easier? Some reflections from an experienced scholar. In Novice writers and scholarly publication (pp. 135-151). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

Chen, S., Nassaji, H., & Liu, Q. (2016). EFL learners’ perceptions and preferences of written corrective feedback: a case study of university students from Mainland China. Asian-Pacific journal of second and foreign language education, 1(1), 1-17.

Chung, B. (2015). Written Corrective Feedback: The Perception of Korean EFL Learners. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 19(2), 75-88.

Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The counseling psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.

Han, Y., & Hyland, F. (2015). Exploring learner engagement with written corrective feedback in a Chinese tertiary EFL classroom. Journal of second language writing, pp. 30, 31–44.

Icekson, T., & Pines, A. M. (2013). Positive perception: A three-dimensional model and a scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 54(2), 180-186.

Jackson, P. (1986). The practices of teaching. New York: Teachers College Press.

Karimi, S. H. (2016). Effects of different types of teacher written corrective feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ writing accuracy. Journal of Applied Linguistics and Language Research, 3(2), 216-229.

Mahmood, R. Q. (2019). Kurdish EFL Learners' Perceptions of Written Corrective Feedback and Its Types (Doctoral dissertation, California State University, Northridge).

Mao, S. & Crosthwaite, P. (2019). Investigating Written Corrective Feedback: (Mis)alignment of Teachers’ Beliefs and Practice. Journal of Second Language Writing, 45, 46-60.

O. Nyumba, T., Wilson, K., Derrick, C. J., & Mukherjee, N. (2018). The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation. Methods in Ecology and evolution, 9(1), 20-32.

Rajagopalan, I. (2019). Concept of Teaching. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 7(2), 5-8.

Richards, J. C., & Schmidt, R. W. (2013). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. Routledge.

Santangelo, T., Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (2007). Self-regulated strategy development: A validated model to support students who struggle with writing. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 5(1), 1–20.

Saragih, N. A., Madiya, S., Siregar, R. A., & Saragih, W. (2021). Written Corrective Feedback: Students' Perception and Preferences. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 8(2), 676-690.

Sari, M. (2020). Investigating Teachers’ written Corrective Feedback At Senior High School 1 Kampar (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Siyarif Kasim Riau).

Shang, H. F. (2022). Exploring online peer feedback and automated corrective feedback on EFL writing performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(1), 4–16.

Syamsir, M. (2016). Using indirect corrective feedback to improve students’ writing ability of the fourth semester of STIK Stella Maris Makassar. IDEAS: Journal on English Language.

Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 4(1). DOI: 10.24256/ideas.v4i1.170.

Trabelsi, S. (2021). The Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices vs the Students’ Preferences in an EFL Context.

Wahyuni, S. (2017). The Effect of Different Feedback on Writing Quality of College Students with Different Cognitive Styles. Dinamika Ilmu, 17(1), 39-58.

Yu, S., Jiang, L., & Zhou, N. (2020). Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study. Assessing Writing, 44, 100451.

Yulianti, T., & Sulistiyawati, A. (2021). Enhancing public speaking ability through focus group discussion. Jurnal Pajar (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 5(2), 287-295.

Zhang, T., Chen, X., Hu, J., & Ketwan, P. (2021). EFL students' preferences for written corrective feedback: do error types, language proficiency, and foreign language enjoyment matter? Frontiers in Psychology, 12.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 197 times | PDF view : 24 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Firmansyah Firmansyah, Maemuna Muhayyang, Muh. Tahir

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Excellence in English Language Education (JoEELE), Faculty of Languages and Literature Universitas Negeri Makassar

  

address icon red

 Jalan Malengkeri Raya, Makassar, 90224 Kampus UNM Parangtambung, Indonesia  
  joeele@unm.ac.id  
  https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JoEELE/index 
   081353988845 (Chief Editor) 
 

JoEELE is Indexed by Google Scholar and Cross Reference

Address: Department of English Language Office, DC Building, UNM Parangtambung Campus, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia