Student Teachers’ Verbal and Nonverbal Communication in EFL Class at MAN 2 Makassar

Nurdiana Nurdiana(1), La Sunra(2*), Chairil Anwar Korompot(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


The method used in this research is the descriptive qualitative method with a sample of 6 student teachers divided into teams. Each team has two students in the class. Class 10 MIPA 6 consisted of 29 students, and Class 10 IKA consisted of 32 students. The researchers analyzed five videos of teaching and learning sessions. The researchers observed and recorded the teaching and learning activities at MAN 2 Makassar through the Ajarmi program. While the student teachers Ajarmi teach, they record their lessons on video. After observation, the researchers watched the video and then transcribed the video. Then, the researchers analyzed and then classified in the form of communication both verbal and nonverbal communication. The researchers found four types of verbal communication used by student teachers in the classroom, there are intrapersonal communication, interpersonal communication, public communication and small group communication. Meanwhile, there are three types of verbal communication used by student teachers in the classroom, there are kinesics, proxemics and facial expression. So, it can be concluded that the most frequently used by student teachers is public communication the types of verbal communication because student teachers always involve all students in the learning process so that they know the increase in students’ knowledge in EFL class.


Keywords


Verbal communication; nonverbal communication; EFL class

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfatihi, M. (2006). The role of nonverbal communication in beginners’ EFL classrooms. Sidi Mohamed Benabdellah University.

Antika, R., & Ikhsan, M. K. (2018). Teachers’ nonverbal communication in english teaching and learning process. Tell-Us Journal, 4(1), 65-79.

Bungolawa. (2015). Verbal and Nonverbal communication. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

Burgoon, J. K., & Buller, D. B. (1994). Interpersonal deception: III. Effects of deceit on perceived communication and nonverbal behavior dynamics. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 18, 155-184.

Chaudhry, N. A., & Arif, M. (2012). Teachers' Nonverbal Behavior and Its Impact on Student Achievement. International Education Studies, 5(4), 56-64.

Diaries, H. (2020, August). Difference Between Verbal and Nonverbal Communication. Retrieved from https://harappa.education/harappa-diaries/verbal-and-nonverbal-communication

Garfield, J. (1993). Teaching statistics using small-group cooperative learning. Journal of Statistics education, 1(1).

Hans, A., & Hans, E. (2015). Kinesics, haptics and proxemics: Aspects of non-verbal communication. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science (IOSR-JHSS), 20(2), 47-52.

Heap, J. L. (1985). Discourse in the production of classroom knowledge: Reading lessons. Curriculum inquiry, 15(3), 245-279.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. sage.

Pogue, L. L., & Ahyun, K. (2006). The effect of teacher nonverbal immediacy and credibility on student motivation and affective learning. Communication Education, 55(3), 331-344.

Remesh, A. (2013). Microteaching, an efficient technique for learning effective teaching. Journal of research in medical sciences: the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, 18(2), 158.

Sudding, F. H., Dollah, S., & Sakkir, G. (2021, March). Teachers’ Nonverbal Immediacy in English Language Learning. In Proceeding book the language teacher training and education international conference (Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 197-217). PROGRAM MAGISTER PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN UNIVERSITAS SEBELAS MARET.

Vevea, N. N., Pearson, J. C., Child, J. T., & Semlak, J. L. (2009). The only thing to fear is… public speaking?: Exploring predictors of communication in the public speaking classroom. Journal of the Communication, Speech & Theatre Association of North Dakota, 22, 1-8.

Xu, J., Gannon, P. J., Emmorey, K., Smith, J. F., & Braun, A. R. (2009). Symbolic gestures and spoken language are processed by a common neural system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(49), 20664-20669.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 104 times | PDF view : 17 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Nurdiana Nurdiana, La Sunra, Chairil Anwar Korompot

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Excellence in English Language Education (JoEELE), Faculty of Languages and Literature Universitas Negeri Makassar

  

address icon red

 Jalan Malengkeri Raya, Makassar, 90224 Kampus UNM Parangtambung, Indonesia  
  [email protected]  
  https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JoEELE/index 
   081353988845 (Chief Editor) 
 

JoEELE is Indexed by Google Scholar and Cross Reference

Address: Department of English Language Office, DC Building, UNM Parangtambung Campus, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia