EFL STUDENTS' PERCEPTION OF TEACHER ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK

St. Fajriana Tahir(1), Maemuna Muhayyang(2), Munir Munir(3*),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


This study aimed to investigate the students’ perception of teacher oral corrective feedback used in the classroom. The method of the research was a descriptive qualitative method. The participants of the study were first-year students of the English Language Education Department, Universitas Negeri Makassar in the academic year 2022/2023. Seven students were selected as the participants using a purposive sampling technique. The instrument of this research was an interview. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the data collected in the interview transcript. Overall, the students have both positive and negative perceptions of oral corrective feedback. The students revealed that they believe oral corrective feedback is needed in their learning performances as it 1) helps the learning progress 2) makes the students aware of the error 3) makes the students feel motivated and appreciated. In contrast, the negative perceptions found from oral corrective feedback are 1) feeling anxious and disappointed 2) reducing self-esteem 3) labelling. Even though students’ perceptions varied, they all accepted every feedback needed for their performances. Lastly, they expected to receive oral corrective feedback with some encouragement and appreciation. Thus, it is concluded the students generally have a positive perception with some notes on teacher oral corrective feedback.


Keywords


Teacher oral corrective feedback; EFL; perception

Full Text:

PDF

References


Agudo, M., & de Dios, J. (2013). An investigation into how EFL learners emotionally respond to teachers' oral corrective feedback. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 15(2), 265-278.

Askew, S. & Lodge, C. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong and loops – linking feedback and learning. In Askew, S. (editor). Feedback for learning. London; New York: Routledge/Falmer

Ayedh, A., & Khaled, E. (2011). EFL teachers' feedback to oral errors in EFL classroom: Teachers' perspectives. Arab World English Journal, 2, (1), 214-232.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.144180

Clarke, S. (2003). Enriching feedback in the primary classroom: Oral and written feedback from teachers and children. London: Hodder and Stoughton.

Fadilah, A. E., Anugerahwati, M., & Prayogo, J. A. (2017). EFL STUDENTS’ PREFERENCES FOR ORAL CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN SPEAKING INSTRUCTION. Jurnal Pendidikan Humaniora, 5(2), 76-87.

Halim, A., Mahzum, E., Yacob, M., Irwandi, I., & Halim, L. (2021). The impact of narrative feedback, e-learning modules and realistic video and the reduction of misconception. Education Sciences, 11(4), 158.

Hamouda, A. (2011). A Study of Students and Teachers' Preferences and Attitudes towards Correction of Classroom Written Errors in Saudi EFL Context. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 128-141.

Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. CA: Teller Road, Thousand Oaks. Vol. 77, No. 1 (Mar., 2007) (81-112).

Kim, Y., & Mostafa, T. (2021). Teachers’ and Students’ Beliefs and Perspectives about Corrective Feedback.

Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.

Mastang, (2019), Students’ perception toward lecturer s’ oral corrective feedback in students speaking English at the ninth-grade students of SMP negri 2 Sungguminasa. (A thesis, UNISMUH).

Maizola, S. (2016). Umpan Balik Guru secara Lisan dalam Memperbaiki Penampilan Berdialog Siswa pada Kelas Sepuluh di SMA PGRI 1 Padang. (Undergraduate Thesis)

Moss, C. M. & Brookhart, S. M. (2009). Advancing formative assessment in every classroom: A guide for instructional leaders. Alexandria Va.: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Mulyani, S., Ningsih, N., & Setyaningrum, N. I. (2022). Students’ Perceptions Towards Oral Corrective Feedback in A Speaking Class. English Teaching Learning and Research Journal, 8, 174-184. https://doi.org/10.24252/Eternal.V81.2022.A1

Muslem, A., Zulfikar, T., & Astila, I. (2017). Students’ perception of oral corrective feedback in speaking classes. English Education Journal, 8(3), 275-291.

Muslem, A., Marhaban, S., Heriansyah, H., & Utama, R. P. (2022). The effects of using blog- assisted language learning (BALL) in improving non-native students’ English writing skill in higher education; does it work? JOTSE: Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 21-32.

Muyasoha & Sugianto. (2019). Proceedings of International Conference on English Language Teaching (INACELT). Prodi Tadris Bahasa Inggris, Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa, Fakultas Tarbiyah dan Ilmu Keguruan, IAIN Palangka Raya.

Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2005). Error correction: Students’ versus teachers’ perceptions. Language awareness, 14(2-3), 112-127.

Li, S. (2014). Oral corrective feedback, ELT Journal, Volume 68, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages 196– 198, https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct076

Pirhonen, N. (2016). Students’ perceptions about the use of oral feedback in EFL classrooms. Retrieved from ProQuest Digital Dissertations.

Putri, N. V. W., Munir, A., & Anam, S. (2021). Students’ perceptions of teacher feedback in EFL English class and their self-regulated learning after receiving feedback. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11(1), 42-60. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i1.2237

Sheen, Y & Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching. Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning. 2. 593-610.

Simard, D., & Jean, G. (2011). An exploration of L2 teachers’ use of pedagogical interventions devised to draw L2 learners’ attention to form. Language Learning, 61(3), 759-785.

Vattoy, K. D., & Smith, K. (2019). Students’ perceptions of teachers’ feedback practice in teaching English as a foreign language. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 260–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.024

Wong, S., & Wong, J. (1980). The effectiveness of clinical teaching: a model for self‐ evaluation. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 5(5), 531-537.

Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014). EFL learners' anxiety level and their beliefs about corrective feedback in oral communication classes. System, 42, 429-439.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 172 times | PDF view : 18 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 St. Fajriana Tahir, Maemuna Muhayyang, Munir Munir

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Editorial Office

Journal of Technology in Language Pedagogy (JTechLP)

Faculty of Languages and Literature Universitas Negeri Makassar

  

address icon red

 Jalan Malengkeri Raya, Makassar, 90224 Kampus UNM Parangtambung, Indonesia  
  [email protected]  
  https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JTechLP/index 
   085299332119 (Chief Editor) 
 

JTechLP is Indexed by Google Scholar, Garuda and Cross Reference


 

Address: Department of English Language Office, DC Building, UNM Parangtambung Campus, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia