THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTION TOWARDS THE USE OF GOOGLE MEET IN MICRO TEACHING
(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This study aims to determine students' perceptions of the use of google meet in micro-teaching. The researcher applied mixed quantitative and qualitative methods. to achieve the purpose of the study, the data was collected in the form of a Likert questionnaire, and interview. The subjects of this study were students of the Makassar State University, particularly in the English Education Department academic 2022/2023. The sample of the questionnaire is 30 students and Interviews of 10 students were taken using the voluntary sampling technique/non-probability sampling technique. The results of data analysis show that (1) positive student perceptions of the use of Google meet application in micro-teaching with the classification, 7(23%) students classified Strongly positive, 12 (40%) students classified Positive, 9 (9%) students are classified as Medium, 2 (2%) students are classified as Negative and not there are students who are classified as strongly negative. (2) Student explanations in interviews regarding the perception of using google meet explained that google meet is a good and interesting online learning tool, and has good features that really support micro teaching-learning in this pandemic era. Even though there is a pandemic, students can still learn micro-teaching through google meet because in google meet learning students and lecturers can still interact and discuss well like in an offline class.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alfaraweh, Hejab Ma’azer., and Jusoh, Shaidah. (2017). The Use and Effects of Smartphones in Higher Education. iJIM-Vol. 11, No.6.
Alizamar, Nazbahri (2016). Psikologi Persepsi Dan Desain Informasi. Yogyakarta: Media Akademi.
Allen, D.W. And Eve, A.W. (1968) Microteaching. Theory into Practice, 7, 181185.Https://Doi.Org/10.1080/00405846809542153.
Allen, Dwight And Kevin Ryan. 1969. Microteaching, University of Massachusetts And University of Chicago, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company Inc.
Almisad, Bodour. (2015). A Study of Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Towards the Use of SMS to Support Learning and Teaching at Kuwait University. Doctor of Education Thesis. Faculty of Education. University of Wallongong.
Arifmiboy (2019). Microteaching: Model Tadalurin Wd Group. Perpustakaan Nasional: Katalog Dalam Terbitan (KDT).
Bakar, Ramli. (2014). The Effect of Learning Motivation on Student’s Productive Competences in Vocational High School, West Java. International Journal of Asian Social Science. 4(6): 722-732.
Barakati, D (2013). Dampak Penggunaan Smartphone Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris (Persepsi Mahasiswa). Manado: Universitas Smaratulangi.
Barker, AKrull, G Mllinson, B. (2005). “A Proposed Theoritical Model for M-Learning Adoption in Developing Countries”. Journal. Department of Information System, South Africa: Rhodes University.
Barry, (1998). A Study of Students’ Perception in English Classes. Vol.33 No.2.
Berliner. (1984). Educational psychology 3rd edition. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology.
Coumbia: Clures E. Marri Publishing Company.
Creswell, John.W. (2009). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Course Smart. (2011). Digital dependence of today’s college students revealed in new study from coursesmartTM. Retrieved from http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/01/idUS141122
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach. Sage publications.
Creswell, John. W. (2009). Research Design: Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Cumaoglu, Gonca Kizilkaya. (2015). How Mobile Device Effect Students According to Teachers’ Beliefs. Journal of International Education. Volume.11. No.4
Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical models for E-Learning: A theory-based design framework. International journal of technology in teaching and learning.
Dabbagh, N. (2005). Pedagogical models for E-Learning: A theory-based design framework. International journal of technology in teaching and learning.
Dean, J. (2010). Smartphone user survey: a glimpse into the mobile lives of college students. Retrivedfromhttp://testkitchen.colorado.edu/projects/reports/smartphone/smartphone-survey/
Fatimannisa, A. 2020. Students’ Perception on The Use of Ruangguru Application in Their English Learning. Thesis. Department of English Education of State University of Makassar.
Gagne, Robert. (1999). The Conditioning of Learning and Theory of Instruction. New York: Holt, Rineheart & Winston.
Gay, L. (1981). Educational research. Ohio: A Beel & Howell Company
Gay, L. (2006). Education research: Competencies for analysis and application (8th ed). Colombus, Ohio: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gay, L. (2012). Education research: Competencies for analysis and application (10th ed). Colombus, Ohio: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton, Mifflin and Company.
Gay, L.R.1981.Educational Research Competences for Analysis and Application.
Gilarso.T. Program Pengalaman Lapangan. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset
Hartono, B. (2010). Pengajaran Mikro: Strategi Pembelajaran Calon Guru Atau Guru Menguasai Keterampilan Dasar Mengajar. Semarang: Widya Karya.
Helda Trisna, M. Zaim (2021). Effectiveness of The Zoom Meeting Applications in Micro Teaching Lectures in The Pandemic time Covid-19. 4 Rd English Language and Literature International Conference (Ellic) Proceedings – (Ellic Proceedings Vol. 4, 2021)
Irwanto. (2002). Psikologi Umum. Jakarta: PT. Prenhallindo
L. Gavirlova, M. (2006). Computational science and its applications-ICCSA. Glaskow: Springer.
N. Junartini & W. Rasna (2020). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Google Meet Dalam Keterampilan Menyimak Dan Berbicara Untuk Pembelajaran Bahasa Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha Singaraja, Indonesia.
Kumar, M. (2011). Impact of the evolution of smart phones in education technology and its application in technical and professional studies: Indian perspective. International Journal of Managing Information Technology (IJMIT), 3(3), 39-49.
Lakshmi, Sri Rangga. (2016). Smartphone Impact on today’s Society. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research on Development. Volume 3. Issue.5. No. 269-272.
Lindays Peter and Donald A. Norman. (1997). Human Information Processing: An Introduction to Psychology.
NME Juniartini, 2 IW Rasna (2020). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Google Meet Dalam Keterampilan Menyimak Dan Berbicara Untuk Pembelajaran Bahasa Pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19, Indonesia 1 [email protected], [email protected]
Norries, C., Hossain, A., & Soloway, E. (2011). Using smartphones as essential tools for learning: A call to place schools on the right side of the 21st century. Educational Technology. 51(3), 18-25.
Prensky, M (2005). Listen to the Natives. Educational Leadership, 63(4), 9-3.
Ralph.G Edwin.2014. The Effectiveness of Microteaching: Five Years’ Findings. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE) Volume 1
Riyanti.D (2021). The Use of Google Meet for Online Microteaching. EELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 8(2), 323-340
Siemens, G. (2003). learning Ecology, Communities, and Networks: Extending the Classroom.retrivedfromhttp://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/Learning_communities.htm
Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Theoplus.C(2021) The Students’ Perception Toward the Implementation Google Meet As E-Learning Platform at The Second-Semester of Madako University. JME Volume 6.
Udrus, Muhammad Al’afaf. (2015). Students’ perceptions of Teacher Rewards Given When Teaching English (A study at The First Grade SMP Negeri 21 Makassar). Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.
Winkel, W.S. 1991. Psikologi Pengajaran, Jakarta, Penerbit PT. Grasindo.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 779 times | PDF view : 137 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 JTechLP: Journal of Technology in Language Pedagogy
Editorial Office
Journal of Technology in Language Pedagogy (JTechLP)
Faculty of Languages and Literature Universitas Negeri Makassar
| Jalan Malengkeri Raya, Makassar, 90224 Kampus UNM Parangtambung, Indonesia | ||||
 | [email protected] | ||||
 | https://ojs.unm.ac.id/JTechLP/index | ||||
 | 085299332119 (Chief Editor) | ||||
JTechLP is Indexed by Google Scholar, Garuda and Cross Reference
Address: Department of English Language Office, DC Building, UNM Parangtambung Campus, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia