Implementasi Online Peer Assesment pada Pembelajaran Bauran

Hartoto Hartoto; Sella Mawarni; Muhammad Rais

doi:10.26858/jkp.v7i1.45864

Implementasi Online Peer Assesment pada Pembelajaran Bauran

Hartoto Hartoto^(1*), Sella Mawarni⁽²⁾, Muhammad Rais⁽³⁾,

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar, ID Scopus: 57205055597
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jkp.v7i1.45864

Abstract

This study describes the implementation of online peer assessment which was carried out in blended learning in Information and Communication Technology courses in elementary schools involving 143 students. The online peer assessment is carried out through 6 stages, namely 1) the design stage, 2) the perception leveling stage, 3) the task collection stage, 4) the assessment stage, 5) the assessment objection stage, and 6) the value determination stage. Each stage is described qualitatively. Through online peer assessment, students are more actively involved in the learning process, easing the lecturer's task in conducting assessments, and the learning outcomes obtained show high scores so as to help achieve learning objectives.

Keywords

online peer assesment; blended learning; learning management system

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alias, M., Masek, A., & Salleh, H. H. M. (2015). Self, Peer and Teacher As-sessments in Problem Based Learning: Are They in Agreements? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 309–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.157

Anker-Hansen, J., & Andrée, M. (2015). More Blessed to Give Than Receive – A Study of Peer-assessment of Experimental Design. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 167, 65–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.643

Derrick, G. (2018). The Evaluators’ Eye. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63627-6

Khonbi, Z. A., & Sadeghi, K. (2013). The Effect of Assessment Type (Self Vs. Peer) on Iranian University EFL Students’ Course Achievement. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 1552–1564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.223

Kiay Demak, I. P., Kumara, A., & Suryadi, E. (2013). Pengaruh Peer Assessment dalam Meningkatkan Keterampilan Anamnesis di Skills Laboratory. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran In-donesia: The Indonesian Journal of Medical Education, 2(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpki.25159

Klopper, C., & Drew, S. (2015). Teaching for Learning and Learning for Teaching: Peer Review of Teaching in Higher Education (Online-Ausg). SensePublishers.

Parrott, E. H., Saeedipour, S., Walker, C. M., Best, S. R., Harn, N. R., & Ash, R. M. (2023). Transition From Peer Re-view to Peer Learning: Lessons Learned. Current Problems in Di-agnostic Radiology, S0363018823000403. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2023.03.003

Parsell, M., & Sachs, J. (Eds.). (2014). Peer Review of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: International Perspectives (1st ed. 2014). Springer Netherlands : Imprint: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7639-5

Roberts, T. S. (Ed.). (2006). Self, peer, and group assessment in e-learning. Information Science Pub.

Rochmiyati, R. (2013). Model Peer As-sessment pada Pembelajaran Ko-laboratif Elaborasi IPS Terpadu di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 17(2), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v17i2.1704

Sriyati, S., Permana, A., & Purnamasari, M. (n.d.). Efektivitas Peer Assessment dalam Menilai Kemampuan Kinerja Siswa pada Kegiatan Praktikum Biologi. 13.

Starck, J. M. (2017). Scientific Peer Review. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19915-9

Topping, K. J. (2018). Using peer assess-ment to inspire reflection and learning. Routledge.

Wager, E., Godlee, F., & Jefferson, T. (2005). How to survive peer review (5. impr). BMJ Books.

Wulandari, M., Sriyati, S., & Purwianingsih, W. (2020). Penerapan peer dan self assessment sebagai tolok ukur penilaian kinerja siswa pada materi sistem koordinasi kelas XI SMA. Assimilation: Indonesian Journal of Biology Education, 3(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.17509/aijbe.v3i2.28258