Keterampilan Proses Sains Mahasiswa dalam Pembelajaran Berbantuan PhET

St. Mutia Alfiyanti Muhiddin(1*), Nurfitra Yanto(2), Arie Arma Arsyad(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/cse.v1i3.40842

Abstract


This research is a descriptive study that aims to determine the profile of students' Science Process Skills (KPS) through the percentage of KPS mastery level. The research data was obtained by giving multiple choice KPS tests to three classes which were the subject of this study totaling 70 people. Sampling technique by purposive sampling. Respondents are students who program the Interaction between Physical Factors course in the odd semester of the 2022/2023 academic year. The research results obtained were the percentage of science process skills of students of the Science Education Study Program, FMIPA UNM. The results of the percentage of students' science process skills are indicators of observing with a percentage of 67.3%, grouping 60.1%, interpreting 55.4%, predicting 53.8%, formulating hypotheses 42.0%, planning experiments 40.9%, and communicating 51.8%.


Keywords


Science Process Skill, PhET

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adi, P. W., Martono, T., & Sudarno. (2021). Pemicu Kegagalan Pada Pembelajaran Di Sekolah Selama Pandemi Di Indonesia (Suatu Studi Pustaka). Research and Development Journal of Education, 7(2), 464-473.

Arikunto, S. (2013) Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Ariyana, Y. dkk. (2019). Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Budiman, J. (2021). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran Daring Di Indonesia Selama Masa Pandemi Covid 19. VOX EDUKASI: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 12(1), 104-113.

Direktorat Tenaga Kependidikan. (2008). Penulisan Modul. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Fatmi, N., Siska, D., & Nadia, E. (2021). Pengaruh Penggunaan Modul Pembelajaran Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Siswa. Relativitas: Jurnal Riset Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(2), 68-80.

Huda, M. (2013). Model-model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Belajar.

Husna, A. dan Himmi, N. (2018). The Development of Probing Promting Based-Module on Calculus 2 Course for Mathematics Education Study Program. Mathematics Research and Education Journal, 2(1), 1-7.

KBBI. (2022). Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia (KBBI). Diakses tanggal 5 Desember 2022 dari https://kbbi.web.id/sains.

Maulani, I. dan Ellizar. (2020). Efektivitas Modul Reaksi Redoks Dengan Teknik Probing-Promting Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Ranah Research: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development, 2(4), 74-79.

Rokhmah, F. (2019). Pengembangan Modul Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Probing-Promting Untuk Melatihkan Berpikir Kritis. (Skripsi). Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel, Surabaya.

Sulistyowati, P. (2018). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar dalam Pembelajaran yang Menggunakan dan Tidak Menggunakan Teknik Pembelajaran Probing Prompting. Jurnal Bidang Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 84-90.

Utami, D. (2016). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Probing Promting dalam Pembelajaran Mengabstraksi Teks Negosiasi pada Siswa Kelas X SMA/MA. Jurnal Riksa Bahasa, 2(2), 15


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 77 times | PDF view : 8 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 St Mutia Alfiyanti, Nurfitra Yanto, Arie Arma Arsyad

  Email: [email protected]

Indexed by:

   

 

Creative Commons License
CSE: Celebes Science Education is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

 

View CSE UNM Stats