Bureaucracy Reform in Achieving Efficient Public Administration

Yesi Marince; Sintia Catur Sutantri; Wiwit Kurniasih

Bureaucracy Reform in Achieving Efficient Public Administration

Yesi Marince^(1*), Sintia Catur Sutantri⁽²⁾, Wiwit Kurniasih⁽³⁾,

(1) Universitas Wanita Internasional, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Wanita Internasional, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Wanita Internasional, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This article explores the concept of bureaucracy reform in the context of achieving efficient public administration. The study aims to understand the challenges faced by traditional bureaucratic systems, examine the principles of bureaucracy reform, and highlight the importance of implementing efficient public administration practices. The research utilizes a qualitative approach, drawing on existing literature and case studies. The findings emphasize the need for structural changes, process streamlining, and capacity building to foster an efficient and effective public administration system. This article contributes to the ongoing discourse on bureaucracy reform and provides insights into improving administrative practices.

Keywords

Bureaucracy reform; public administration; capacity building

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ali, A., Shabbir, T., & Ali, W. (2022). A Literature Review on Public Leadership in Organizations. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 3(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v3i1.75

Alshurideh, M., Salloum, S. A., Al Kurdi, B., Monem, A. A., & Shaalan, K. (2019). Understanding the quality determinants that influence the intention to use the mobile learning platforms: A practical study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 13(11), 157–183. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v13i11.10300

Asadullah, M. N. (2018). Poverty reduction during 1990–2013: Did millennium development goals adoption and state capacity matter? World Development, 105, 70–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.12.010

Braune, K., Boss, K., Schmidt-Herzel, J., Gajewska, K. A., Thieffry, A., Schulze, L., Posern, B., & Raile, K. (2021). Shaping Workflows in Digital and Remote Diabetes Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic via Service Design: Prospective, Longitudinal, Open-label Feasibility Trial. JMIR MHealth and UHealth, 9(4), e24374. https://doi.org/10.2196/24374

Charron, N., Dijkstra, L., & Lapuente, V. (2014). Regional governance matters: Quality of government within European Union member states. Regional Studies, 48(1), 68–90.

Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117

Dewi, R. (2016). Membangun Birokrasi Yang Profesional. Perspektif, 2(1), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.31289/perspektif.v2i1.106

Frederickson, G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W., & Licari, M. J. (2012). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Westview Press.

Fukuyama, F. (2016). Governance: What do we know, and how do we know it? Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 89–105.

Kluiters, L., Srivastava, M., & Tyll, L. (2023). The impact of digital trust on firm value and governance: an empirical investigation of US firms. Society and Business Review, 18(1), 71–103.

Öktem, K. G., & Erdogan, C. (2020). Between welfare state and (state-organised) charity: How Turkey’s social assistance regime blends two competing policy paradigms. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 40(3–4), 205–219. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2018-0217

Paetsch, J., & Drechsel, B. (2021). Factors Influencing Pre-service Teachers’ Intention to Use Digital Learning Materials: A Study Conducted During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Germany. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 733830. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733830

Pollitt, C. (2009). Bureaucracies remember, post‐bureaucratic organizations forget? Public Administration, 87(2), 198–218.

Rengifurwarin, Z. A., Akib, A. H., Jasruddin, U. N. M., & Salam, R. (2018a). Snapshot of Public Service Quality in The Center For Integrated Business Service (CIBS), Cooperative Micro Small and Medium Enterprises (CMSME), Maluku Province, Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(3).

Rengifurwarin, Z. A., Akib, H., Jasruddin, & Salam, R. (2018b). Snapshot of public service quality in the center for integrated business service (CIBS), cooperative micro small and medium enterprises (CMSME), Maluku province, Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(3).

Rice, M. F. (2004). Organizational Culture, Social Equity, and Diversity: Teaching Public Administration Education in the Postmodern Era. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 10(2), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.1080/15236803.2004.12001354

Syam, H., Akib, H., Patonangi, A. A., & Guntur, M. (2018a). Principal entrepreneurship competence based on creativity and innovation in the context of learning organizations in Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(Special Issue).

Syam, H., Akib, H., Patonangi, A. A., & Guntur, M. (2018b). Principal entrepreneurship competence based on creativity and innovation in the context of learning organizations in Indonesia. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 21(Special Is).

Wihantoro, Y., Lowe, A., Cooper, S., & Manochin, M. (2015). Bureaucratic reform in post-Asian Crisis Indonesia: The Directorate General of Tax. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 31, 44–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2015.04.002

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 229 times | PDF view : 0 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Ini adalah artikel akses terbuka yang didistribusikan di bawah persyaratan Atribusi 4.0 Internasional (CC BY 4.0)

Username
Password
Remember me