EFFECTS OF FLEXIBLE WORK ARRANGEMENTS ON ETHICAL DECISION MAKING: JOB SATISFACTION AS A MEDIATOR

Tiara Veronika Simamora(1*), Martina Dwi Mustika(2), Bertina Sjabadhyni(3),

(1) Universitas Indonesia
(2) Universitas Indonesia
(3) Universitas Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

Abstract


Abstract. Ethical Decision Making (EDM) is behavior that is based on cognitive morals to choose an ethical decision. Flexible Work Arrangement (FWA) is a work option that allows employees to be flexible in terms of the place of work and its settlement. Job satisfaction is a positive feeling about work. This study will see job satisfaction mediates flexible work arrangement relationships with ethical decision making. This research method is a survey with a cross sectional design. The sample in this study were those who had worked in Indonesia with simple random sampling. The results of the study point out a significant indirect effect of flexible work arrangement on ethical decision making through job satisfaction

Keywords


Ethical Decision Making; Flexibel Work Arrangement; Job Satisfaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ambady, N., & Gray, H.M. (2002). On being sad and mistaken: Mood effects on the accuracy of thin-slice judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 947–961.

Annel, K. & Hartmann. (2007). Flexible Work Arrangements in Asia : What companies are doing,

why they are doing it and what lies ahead. Boston College Center for Work & Family

Barnett, T. (2001). Dimensions of moral intensity and ethical decision making: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 31, 1038– 1057.

Deshpande, S. P. (1996). Ethical climate and the link between success and ethical behavior: An empirical investigation of a non-profit organization. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 315–320

Duhita, Sattwika. (2018, April). Tren Jam Kerja Fleksibel Bikin Anak Muda Lupa Kalau Lembur Harusnya Dibayar. Vice, diunduh dari https://www.vice.com/id_id/article/8xkdbv/tren-jam-kerja-fleksibel-bikin-anak-muda-makin-lupa-kalau-lembur-harusnya-dibayar

Falk, A., & Ichino, A. (2006). Clean Evidence on Peer Effects. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(1), 39–57

Ford, R.C. & Richardson, W.D. (1994). Ethical Decision Making: A review of the Empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13, 205- 221

Golden, T.D., & Veiga, J.F. (2005). The impact of telecommuting on job satisfaction: resolving inconsistent findings. Journal of management, 31, 301-318

Grover, S. L., & Crooker, K. J. (1995). Who appreciates family-responsive human resource policies: The impact of family-friendly policies on the organizational attachment of parents and non-parents. Personnel Psychology, 48, 271-288.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P 2007. Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan. Bandung, PT. Bumi Aksa.

Hobfoll,S.E.(1989).Conservation of resources:A new attemptat conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44, 513–524.

Hoppock, R. (1935). Job Satisfaction. New York. NY: Harper.

Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issuecontingent model. Academy of Management, 16, 366-395.

Kohlberg, L. (1976). Moral Stages and Moralization: The Cognitive-Development Approach. In T.Lickona (Ed.), Moral development and behavior: Theory, research and social issues: 31-53.

Loe, T. W., Ferrell, L., & Mansfield, P. (2000). A review of empirical studies assessing ethical decision making in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 185–204.

Mantel, S.P. (2005). Choice or perception: How affect influences ethical choices among salespeople. Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, 25, 43–55.

Miner, M., & Petocz, A. (2003). Moral Theory in Ethical Decision Making: Problems, Clarifications and Recommendations from a Psychological Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 42(1), 11–25.

Naquin, C. E., Kurtzberg, T. R., & Belkin, L. Y. (2010). The finer points of lying online: E-mail versus pen and paper. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 387–394.

Ongori, H. (2007), A Review of the Literature on Employee Turnover, Africa Journal of Business Management, 1(3): 49-54.

Pascual-Ezama, D., Dunfield, D., Liaño, B. G. G. De, & Prelec, D. (2015). Peer effects in unethical behavior: Standing or reputation? PLoS ONE, 10(4), 1–14.

Paolillo, J. G. P., & Vitell, S. J. (2002). An empirical investigation of the influence of selected personal, organizational, and moral intensity factors on ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 65–74

Rau, B. L., & Hyland, M. M. (2002). Role conflict and flexible work arrangements: The effects on applicant attraction. Personnel Psychology, 55, 111-136.

Rest, J. R. (1986). Moral Development: Advances in Research and Theory. New York: Praeger.

Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2015). Perilaku Organisasi. Jakarta: Salemba Empat

Shklovski, Irina; Kraut, Robert; dan Rainie, Lee. (2004). “The Internet and Social Participation: Contrasting Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analysis”. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 10

Sousa, V. D., & Rojjanasrirat, W. (2010). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and userfriendly guideline. Journal of Evolution in Clinical Practice, 268-274.

Stavrou, E. (2005). ‘Flexible work bundles and organizational competitiveness: a cross-national study of the European work context’, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 923–947

Sukmana, Yoga. (2018, September). Kejagung Tahan Mantan Dirut Pertamina Karen Agustiawan. Kompas, diunduh dari https://nasional.kompas.com/read/2018/09/24/18524511/kejagung-tahan-mantan-dirut-pertamina-karen-agustiawan.

Ten-Brink, B. E. H. (2004). Psychological contract: A useful concept? PhD thesis, Kurt Lewin Instituut Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam

Yetmar, S.A., & Eastman, K.K. (2000). Tax practitioners’ ethical sensitivity: A model and empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 271–288.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/talenta.v4i2.8486

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 126 times | PDF view : 42 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Tiara Veronika Simamora, Martina Dwi Mustika, Bertina Sjabadhyni

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published By:

Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Negeri Makassar

Gedung BM Lantai 2 Kampus Gunungsari Baru,

Jalan A.P. Pettarani, Makassar 90222.

Email: [email protected]

p-ISSN : 2460-8750

e-ISSN : 2615-1731

View My Stats