Analisis Penanganan Teroris Kelompok Mujahidin Indonesia Timur (MIT) Pasca Konflik Di Kabupaten Poso

I Ketut Yakobus(1*), Rinto Z.W. Abidjulu(2), Yuyun Alfasius Tobondo(3), Feliks Arfid Guampe(4),

(1) Prodi Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Kristen Tentena
(2) Prodi Sosiologi, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Kristen Tentena
(3) Prodi Pendidikan Matematika, Fakultas Ilmu Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Kristen Tentena
(4) Prodi Ekonomi Pembangunan, Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Kristen Tentena
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/sosialisasi.v1i1.43252

Abstract


The slow process of handling and enforcing the law against the East Indonesia Mujahadin Terrorism (MIT) group in Poso Regency has triggered violence and killings of civilians and security forces. The objectives of this study are: 1) To identify and analyze the model of handling terrorists of the MIT group that has been carried out by the Government. 3) To identify and analyze the causes of the slow handling of MIT group terrorists. 3) To find an effective and efficient model in the handling of the MIT terrorist group. The research approach used in this study is descriptive qualitative with the number of informants of 15 people, each of whom is a representative of the Government, religious leaders, community leaders, NGOs, and the community. Determination of informants is carried out by purposive sampling. Meanwhile, data collection is carried out by means of observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. The results showed that the model of handling terrorists of the East Indinesian Mujahideen group after the conflict in Poso Regency prioritized a hard power military approach and was not participatory. The military's dominance in the handling of terrorism after the Poso conflict has created a very high sense of dependence on the security forces. In addition, the handling of terrorism by the East Indonesia Mujahideen group is also repressive, in the sense that the security forces will act in the event of acts of violence or killings committed by the East Indonesia Mujahideen Terrorist Group against civilians and against security forces who are temporarily performing their duties. The approach model that needs to be considered in handling terrorism of the East Indonesia Mujahideen group after the conflict in Poso Regency is the Hybrid model. The choice on the Hybrid model is because this model is soft power, preventive and participatory.

Keywords


Terrorism; Mujahideen of East Indonesia; Hybrid

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amidhan. et al. (2005). Poso, Kekerasaan yang Tak Kunjung Usai: Refleksi 7 Tahun Konflik Poso. Jakarta: Komnas HAM.

Aritonang, J.L. 2004. Sejarah Perjumpaan Kristen dan Islam di Indonesia. (cetakan I). PT. BPK Gunung Mulia, Jakarta.

Arif M, Kerukunan Beragama Pada Era Globalisasi, 1997, Bandung

Aragon, Lorraine. 2001. “communal violence in Poso, Central Sulawesi; where people eat fish and fis eat people”, Indonesia.

Ball. N (2001), “The challenge of rebuilding war-torn socities” chester ACrocer, fen oster Hampson, Pamela Aal turbulent Peace: The Chalenges of managing International Conflict, Washington DC: United States of Peace Press.

Bhabha, K Homi. 1984. Of Mimicry and Man:The ambivalence of ColonialDiscourse Author.

Bellina, Sophie & Mahyani, Ahmad. (2021). Penyitaan Harta Teroris yang telah meninggal Dunia oleh Negara.. Mimbar Keadilan. 14. 230-240. 10.30996/mk.v14i2.5269

Creswell, John W. (1994). Research Design: Qualitative & quantitativee approach.Thousand Oaks, London, New Delhi: Sage

Damanik, R. 2002. Konflik Poso, Skhema Analisis akar dan sebab-sebabnya. paper, disampaikan pada Konsultasi Pemantapan Perdamaian Poso Tentena. Akademi LeimenaJakarta & DPP-GKST, 7-11 Pebruari 2002.

___________2003. Tragedy Kemanusiaan Poso, Menggapai Surya Pagi melalui Kegelapan Malam. Jakarta & Palu, PBHI, CD Bethesda, LPSHAM Sulteng.

Daniele Gazotti, 2014. Conflic resolution in the context of early childhood billingual education-towards a multicultural development.Revista Bruseilira The Linguiston Aplicudu, Vol. 14, No. 2 Belo Horisonte Apr/June 2014. ISSN 1984-6398

Dave Mcrae, 2016. Poso sejarah komprehensip kekerasan antar agama terpanjang di Indonesia pasca refrmasi. CV. Marjin kiri, srpong tanggerang selatan.

Denzim, Norman K., and Lincoln, Yvonna S. 2009. Handbook of qualitative research (terjemahan). Yogyakara Pustaka Pelajar

Fisher, Simon. 2001. Mengelola Konflik: Ketrampilan & Strategi untuk Bertindak (edisi bahasa Indonesia), The British Council, Indonesia, Jakarta.

Galtung,Johan,2003, Studi Perdamaian, Perdamaian dan Konflik, Pembangunan dan Peradaban. Surabaya,PustakaEureka

George J. Aditjondro, 2004. Kerusuhan Poso dan Morowali, Akar Permasalahan dan Jalan Keluarnya, Makalah, ProPatria, 7 Januari 2004

Gogali, Lian. 2011. Konflik Poso, Suara Perempuan dan Anak Menuju Rekonsiliasi Ingatan. Galang Press Yogyakarta

Haba. J, 2006. Analisis SWOT : Kearifan Lokal Dalam Resolusi Konflik, paper, tidak dipublikasikan

Hasrullah, 2009. Dendam konflik Poso (periode 1998-2001) konflik Poso dari Perspektif komunikasi politik,PT. Garamedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta, 2009

Kusuma, Grace & Pratiwi, Tiffany. (2020). Pemberian Status terhadap Teroris berdasarkan konvensi Jenewa. JDP (Jurnal Dinamika Pemerintahan). 3. 133-146. 10.36341/jdp.v3i2.1347.

Kurningsih, N. (2004) Resolusi Konfli Pengelolaan Tanah Ulayat (studi tentang upaya Pemerintah Kabupaten dalam menangani konflik antara masyarakat adat desa tangkan dengan PT Hasfart Utama estate di Kabupaten Barito Selatan). Tesis tidak diterbitkan Universitas Gajah Mada Jogyakarta.

Miles, Matthew B. dan Huberman, A. Michael.1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-metode Baru, Cet. 1, Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.

Puguh, Oleh & Siwi, Elang Puguh Raka. (2020). Strategi Teroris dalam Mencapai kepentingannya Melalui Kekerasan

Ramsbotham, O.,woodhose, T., & Miall, H. (2015), Contemporary Conflict Resolution. Cambridge United Kingdom: Polity Press

Reychland, Luc. 2006. Researcher Peace Building Architectur. (Leuven: Centre for Peace Research and Strategic Studies)

Suprapto . 2013. Revitalisasi Nilai-nilai Kearifan Lokal Bagi Upaya Resolusi Konflik. Jurnal Walisongo, Vol. 21. No.1

Syafiq, Muhammad. (2021). Proses Perubahan Diri Seorang Teroris Menjadi Aktivis Perdamaian. Jurnal Ilmiah Psyche. 15. 73-92. 10.33557/jpsyche.v15i2.1564

Thahir, dkk. (2018). Paradigma Baru Penanganan Terorisme di Sulawesi Tengah. 13. 105-120

Yakobus, I Ketut, dkk.(2019). Revitalisasi Nilai Budaya Sintuwu Maroso Sebagai Alternative resolusi pasca konflik dikabupaten Poso. Jurnal sosio sains 5 (1) 14-21, 2019

Yakobus, I Ketut, dkk.(2019). Hybridization of the Poso Conflict Resolution Discourse. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS). Volume 24, Issue 5. e-ISSN: 2279-0837

Yakobus, I Ketut.(2020).Hibridisasi Wacana: Strategi Penyelesaian Konflik. ISBN 978-623-7729-45-7. Scopindo Media Pustaka, Surabaya


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 96 times | PDF view : 22 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.