Animal Care and Ethics in Contemporary Religious Debates

Peter Ottuh; Onos Godwin Idjakpo

doi:10.26858/sosialisasi.v1i1.22565

Animal Care and Ethics in Contemporary Religious Debates

Peter Ottuh^(1*), Onos Godwin Idjakpo⁽²⁾,

(1) Department of Religious Studies and Philosophy, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State.
(2) Department of Religious Studies and Philosophy, Delta State University, Abraka, Delta State.
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/sosialisasi.v1i1.22565

Abstract

Can religious worldview help humans respect non-human-animals, and achieve a better, more balanced environment? Since Lynn White wrote a damming essay against the Judeo-Christian religion, the answer to the question among most environmental ethicists has often beenon the negative. Lynn White had accused the Western Judeo-Christian worldview as been anthropocentric. Anthropocentrism is the worldview that places humanity at the center of all moral concern, hence, such a worldview enhances the conditions for human exploitation of non-human animals. The Judeo-Christian worldview specifically holds that the Universe was created and fine-tuned for the creation of the human species in particular. On a personal level, this ideology drives the fragile Human ego to think that the God of the Universe created everything on earth for human consumption and domination. Hence, many scholars believe that such a worldview is seen and dominant among most religions across the world. This paper attempt to join the contemporary debates on religious worldview and Animal ethics.Against the popular notion, this paper argues that mostReligious traditions have often been the primary movers of a compassionate engagement with other lives. Thus, religious persons can still respect and conserve animals irrespective of their religion.

Keywords

Animals; Christianity; Hinduism; Islam

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akpan, C. O., Ogar, J. N., & Bassey, S. A. (2020). Examining the Ethics of Research in Animal Experimentation. Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences, 39a(1).

Andrew, E. H. (2006). Contemporary dimensions of interaction between art and technology: implications for stage and media designs. Global Journal of Humanities, 5(1), 31-34.

Andrew, E. H. (2014). The Restrictions of the Modern Proscenium Stage on Traditional African Values. Cajolis: Calabar Journal of Liberal Studies, 7(2), 114-127.

Bassey, S. A., (2020), Technology, Environmental Sustainability and the Ethics of Anthropoholism. Przestrzeń Społeczna, 1(19).

Burtt, E. A. (1955). The Teachings of the Compassionate Buddha ; Early Discourses, the Dhammapada, and Later Basic Writings. New York; New American Library.

Denny, F. M. (1987). Islam and the Muslim Community. San Francisco ; Harper SanFrancisco.

Dorzhigushaeva, O. V., & Kiplyuks, A. V. (2020). Environmental ethics of Buddhism. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 11(3), 154–158.

Dursun, S., & Mankolli, H. (2021). The Value of Nature: Virtue Ethics Perspective. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 4(1 (May)), 1-15.

Esposito, J. L. (1988).Islam ; The Straight Path. Oxford; Oxford U.

Faria, C., &Paez, E. (2014). Anthropocentrism and speciesism: conceptual and normative issues. Revista de Bioética Y Derecho, 32, 95–103.

Gupta, B. (2006). Bhagavad G?Tā As Duty And Virtue Ethics. Journal of Religious Ethics, 34(3), 373–395.

Harris, I. (1997). Buddhism and the Discourse of Environmental Concern; Some Methodological Problems Considered. Cambridge, Harvard U.

Jacobsen, K. A. (2003). Hinduism and Ecology. Environmental Ethics, 25(3), 333–336.

Kokolus, C. C. (2008). Encyclopedia of Religious and Spiritual Development. Theological Librarianship, 1(2), 86–87.

Mbum, P. A., Oben, B., & Ighoteguonor, E. G. (2014). Empirical study on global marketing flows and Nigerian economic growth perspective. Journal of International Business and Economics, 2(4),

-162.

Ogar, J. N., Asira, A. E., & Bassey, E. I. (2021). Land Ethic According to the Biblical Book of Genesis and Isaiah. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 4(1 (May)), 16-30.

Ogar, J. N., Emina, K. A., & Bassey, S. A. (2020). An Ethical Overview of Animal Welfare and the Use of Antibiotics. Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences, 39a(1).

Osuala, A. N., & Nyok, E.-I. E. (2020). New Twist to Political Corruption in 4th Republic Nigeria given Non- Human Animals Stealing millions: A Case for the Defense of Animal Rights. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 1(2).

Peterson, A. (2000). In and of the world? Christian theological anthropology and environmental ethics. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 12(3), 237–261.

Peterson, A. L. (2002). Christianity and Ecology. Environmental Ethics, 24(1), 105–108.

Ravikanth, G. (2021). Indian Philosophy and Environmental Ethics. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 4(1(May), 47-63.

Rosenfeld, D. L. (2019). Ethical Motivation and Vegetarian Dieting: The Underlying Role of Anti-speciesist Attitudes. Anthrozoos, 32(6), 785–796.

Simon, P. J. (2007). Against Holism:Rethinking Buddhist Environmental Ethics. Environmental Values, 16(4), 447–461.

Udoudom, M. (2021). The Value of Nature: Utilitarian Perspective. GNOSI: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Human Theory and Praxis, 4(1 (May)), 31-46.

Umukoro, G. M., Odey, V. E., & Ndifon, M. M. (2020). Immigration, Otherness, Economic mobility and social inclusion in the homeland. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 1(1).

Umukoro, G. M., Odey, V. E., & Yta, E. M. (2020). Tourism Site Infrastructure, Visitor Patronage and Calabar Metropolis. Jurnal Office, 6(2), 97-102.

Van Wieren, G. (2011). Kevin J. O’Brien. An ethics of biodiversity: Christianity, ecology, and the variety of life. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 1(4), 315–317.

Vodicar, J., & Stala, J. (2018). Monotheism and environmental education. BogoslovniVestnik, 78(2), 415–427.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 300 times | PDF view : 30 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is a website that publishes an open-access article distributed under Licensed Creative Commons License the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Username
Password
Remember me