Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Terintegrasi Keterampilan Berpikir Komputasi yang Valid dan Reliabel pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama
(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abstrak, Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengembangkan perangkat pembelajaran matematika pada Sekolah Menengah Pertama terintegrasi kompetensi abad 21-keterampilan berpikir komputasi. Metode yang digunakan termasuk dalam penelitian berbasis desain (Design-based Research) dengan melibatkan ahli dan stakeholder. Tahapan pengembangan dimulai dengan analisis masalah, pengembangan solusi, evaluasi dan uji solusi secara praktis, kemudian doumentasi dan refleksi untuk menghasilkan perangkat. Hasil penelitian yang diperoleh berupa perangkat pembelajaran matematika SMP yang valid dan reliabel terintegrasi keterampilan berpikir komputasi
Kata kunci: Berpikir Komputasi, Perangkat Pembelajaran, Matematika
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adler, R. F., & Kim, H. (2018). Enhancing future K-8 teachers’ computational thinking skills through modeling and simulations. Education and Information Technologies, 23(4), 1501-1514.
Akker, J. van den, Bannan, B., Kelly, A.E., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research: Part A: An introduction. Enschede: SLO. Dari International - SLO
Burke, Q., Bailey, C. S., & Ruiz, P. (2019). CIRCL primer: Assessing Computational Thinking. Dalam CIRCL Primer Series. Diakses dari https://circlcenter.org/ assessing-computational-thinking/
Cotton, W., Lockyer, L. & Brickell, G. (2009). A Journey Through a Design-Based Research Project. In G. Siemens & C. Fulford (Eds.), Proceedings of ED-MEDIA 2009--World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia & Telecommunications (pp. 1364-1371). Honolulu, HI, USA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Dari https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/31662/.
Ellis, T. & Levy, Y. (2010). A Guide for Novice Researchers: Design and Development Research Methods.: https://doi.org/10.28945/1237
Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J.M., Minniti, L., & White, B. (2016). Computational Thinking, Grade 1 Students and the Binomial Theorem. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. 3, 77–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-016-0019-3
Gadanidis, G., Brodie, I., Minniti, L., & Silver, B. (2017). Computer Coding in the K-8 Mathematics Curriculum. What Works: Research into Practice. ON: Queen’s Printer for Ontario.
Green, A. (2019). Put your (computational) thinking cap on!. CSIRO Scope, dari https://blog.csiro.au/put-your-computational-thinking-cap-on/
Gregory, R. J. (2015). Psychological Testing: History, Principles, and Applications (7th). Boston: Pearson.
Hripcsak, G., & Rothschild, A. S. (2005). Agreement, the f-measure, and reliability in information retrieval. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association: JAMIA, 12(3), 296–298. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M1733
Johnson, C., Hill, L., Lock, J., Altowairiki, N., Ostrowski, C., da Rosa dos Santos, L., & Liu, Y. (2017). Using design-based research to develop meaningful online discussions in undergraduate field experience courses. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6). Dari http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2901/4373
Kalelioglu, F., Gubahar, Y., Kukul, V. (2016). A Framework for Computational Thinking Based on a Systematic Research Review. Baltic J. Modern Computing, 4(3), 583-596.
Kelly, L & Booth, C. (2004). Dictionary of Strategy: Strategic Management, SAGE Publications, Inc.
Kotsopoulos, D., Floyd, L., Khan, S., Namukasa, I.K., Somanath, S., Weber, J., & Yiu, C. (2017). A pedagogical framework for computational thinking. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 3(2), 154-171. https://doi.org/10.1007/S40751-017-0031-2
Mohaghegh, D. M., & McCauley, M. (2016). Computational thinking: The skill set of the 21st century.
Nieveen, N. (2007). Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research dalam Plomp, T., & Nieveen, N. M. (Eds.) (2010). An introduction to educational design research: Proceedings of the seminar conducted at the East China Normal University, Shanghai (PR China), November 23-26, 2007. (3rd print ed.) Stichting Leerplan Ontwikkeling (SLO).
OECD (2018). PISA 2021 Mathematics Framework (second draft). Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
Rambally, G. (2017). Integrating computational thinking in discrete structures. In Emerging research, practice, and policy on computational thinking (pp. 99-119). Springer, Cham.
Reeves, T. (2000). Enhancing the worth of instructional technology research through “design experiments” and other development research strategies. Paper presented at the Annual AERA Meeting, April 24-28, New Orleans. Retrieved 15th Oct, 2003, dari http://treeves.coe.uga.edu/AERA2000Reeves.pdf
Sandoval, W. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Design-based research methods for studying learning in context: Introduction. Educational Psychologist, 39(4), 199-201. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3904_1
Sherwood, H., Fancsali, C., Israel, M., Diamond, J., & Moeller, B. (2020). Framework for Effective Computational Thinking Integration in Elementary (K–5) Schools. New York, NY: EDC Center for Children and Technology.
Stein, D. (1998). Situated Learning in Adult Education, ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult Career and Vocational Education, Columbus OH.
Storey, A. (adt). (2018). Bebras Australia Computational Thinking Challenge: Solution Guide. Australia. Digitalcareers.
Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49(3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
Wing, J. M. (2014). Computational thinking benefits society. 40th Anniversary Blog of Social Issues in Computing. Dari Computational Thinking Benefits Society | (toronto.edu)
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 323 times | PDF view : 100 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.