CREATIVE THINKING PROCESS IN STUDENT‘S SCIENTIFIC WORKS

Alfi Syahrin(1*), Dawud Dawud(2), Heri Suwignyo(3), Abdul Wahid(4),

(1) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Almuslim
(2) Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang
(3) Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Negeri Malang
(4) Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v17i1.56045

Abstract


This study aims to explain the process of creative thinking, including analytic, evaluative, applicative, and interpretative students in scientific work. The scientific works studied were in the form of Student Creativity Program, State University of Malang, Indonesia. This research uses a qualitative approach with a content analysis method. This research data in the form of paragraphs, paragraph clusters, and full text. The data source of this research is the scientific work of students. The research data collection technique was carried out by survey and documentation study. The process of data analysis is grouped into three stages, namely data reduction, data presentation, and drawing conclusions. The findings of this study indicate that the process of creative thinking in writing scientific papers can be done with four stages (1) the analytic stage in scientific work looks at the examination of arguments. (2) Evaluative in scientific work looks at the assessment of arguments in accordance with the topic of study. (3) Applicative in the work appears in arguing according to procedure. (4) Interpretations in scientific work appear in the clarification of meaning, so that the meaning conveyed is clear and directed. The findings of this study contribute to an author's understanding of the importance of using creative thinking processes in scientific writing. However, for further research it is recommended to examine the process of creative thinking with different objects.

Keywords


thought process, creative, writing, scientific work

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baumtrog, M. D. (2017). Others and Imagination in Reasoning and Argumentation: Improving ur Critical Creative Capacity. Informal Logic, 37(2),.

Bloom, B. S. (2010). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Christmas, D., Kudzai, C., & Josiah, M. (2013). Vygotsky ’ S Zone of Proximal Development Theory: What Are Its Implications for Mathematical Teaching?. Greener Journal of Social Sciences, 3(7).

Facione, P. A., & Facione, N.C. (2013). Critical Thinking for Life: Valuing, Measuring, and Training Critical Thinking in All Its Forms. Spring, 28(1).

Ganapathy, M., Mehar Singh, M. K., Kaur, S., & Kit, L. W. (2017). Promoting Higher Order Thinking Skills via Teaching Practices. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 23(1).

Gube, M., & Lajoie, S. (2020). Adaptive Expertise and Creative Thinking: A Synthetic Review and Implications for Practice. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 35.

Gregory, E., Hardiman, M., Yarmolinskaya, J., Rinne, L., & Limb, C. (2013). Building Creative Thinking in The Classroom: From Research To Practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 62.

Kusmana, S. (2012). Merancang Karya Tulis Ilmiah. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Kuswana, W. S. (2014). Taksonomi Kognitif: Perkembangan Ragam Berpikir. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Larraz-Rábanos, N. (2021). Development of Creative Thinking Skills in the Teaching-Learning Process. Teacher education-New perspectives, 307-322.

Lee, P., & Lin, H. (2019). The Effect of The Inductive and Deductive Data-Driven Learning (DDL) on Vocabulary Acquisition and Retention. System, 8.

Mertes, E.S. (2013). A Mathematics Education Comparative Analysis of ALEKS Technology and Direct Classroom Instruction. ProQuest LLC. Bethel University.

Mukhadis. (2015). Kiat Menulis Karya Ilmiah. Yogyakarta: Aditiya Media Publishing.

Mumford, M. D., Giorgini, V., Gibson, C., & Mecca, J. (2013). Creative Thinking: Processes, Strategies and Knowledge. In Handbook of Research on Creativity. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Miles, Matthew B. & A. Michael Huberman. (1992). Qualitative Data Analysis. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

Murkatik, K., Harapan, E., & Wardiah, D. (2020). The influence of Professional and Pedagogic Competence on Teacher’s Performance. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 1(1).

Nevid, Jeffrey S. (2017). Psychology; Concepts and Applications. Houghton Miffin Company.

Perkins, C., & Murphy, E. (2006). Identifying and Measuring Individual Engagement in Critical Thinking in Online Discussions: An exploratory case study. Educational Technology and Society, 9(1).

Rapanta, C. (2019). Argumentation as Critically Oriented Pedagogical Dialogue. Informal Logic, 39(1).

Russell, B. (2015). Knowledge by Acquaintance and Knowledge by Description. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 11(3): 108–128.

Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories: An Education Perspective. New York: The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.

Sitorus, J., & Masrayati. (2016). Students’ Creative Thinking Process Atages: Implementation of Realistic Mathematics Education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 22.

Srikongchan, W., Kaewkuekool, S., & Mejaleurn, S. (2021). Backward Instructional Design Based Learning Activities to Developing Students' Creative Thinking with Lateral Thinking Technique. International Journal of Instruction, 14(2).

Sultan, Rofi’uddin, A., Nurhadi, & Tri Priyatni, E. (2017). Critical Responses to Texts: Reading Attitudes of University Students in Indonesian Learning Context. KnE Social Sciences, 1(3).

Suwanarak, K. (2018). Self-Evaluation of Thai Adult Learners in English Writing Practice. 3L The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(2).

Sternberg, Robert J. (2003). Wisdom, Intelligence, and Creativity Synthesized. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Syahrin, A., Dawud, Suwignyo, H., & Priyatni, E. T. (2019). Creative Thinking Patterns In Student‘s Scientific Works. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 19(81).

Xie, X. (2023). The Cognitive Process of Creative Design: A perspective of Divergent Thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 48, 101266.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 160 times | PDF view : 41 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Alfi Syahrin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Department of Indonesian Language, Faculty of Languages and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar in cooperate with Asosiasi Dosen Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (ADOBSI) and Ikatan Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (IKAPROBSI).

Address: Department of Indonesian Language Office, DG Building Second Floor, UNM Parangtambung, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Email: [email protected]

e-ISSN 2614-2716

p-ISSN 2301-4768

Indexed by:

Creative Commons License
RETORIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra,dan Pengajarannya is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.