DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACT IN EXPRESSION OF MAGICAL POWER ON THE WALLS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Rani Setiawaty; Agus Budi Wahyudi; Atiqa Sabardila; Joko Santoso

doi:10.26858/retorika.v16i2.48574

DIRECTIVE SPEECH ACT IN EXPRESSION OF MAGICAL POWER ON THE WALLS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL

Rani Setiawaty^(1*), Agus Budi Wahyudi⁽²⁾, Atiqa Sabardila⁽³⁾, Joko Santoso⁽⁴⁾,

(1) Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, Universitas Muria Kudus
(2) Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(3) Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(4) Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/retorika.v16i2.48574

Abstract

This study aims to describe the form of directive speech act, mode, and function in expression of magical power on the walls of elementary school at Karesidenan Surakarta. This type of research is descriptive qualitative. The data are in the form of words, expressions, and sentences contained expression of magical power on the walls of elementary school at Karesidenan Surakarta. Analyzing data of the research uses referential equivalent, pragmatic, translational, and distribution methods of reading markup techniques. Collecting data uses the documentation method. The results show that first, the expression of magical power on the walls of elementary school at Karesidenan Surakarta indicate two forms of speech acts, namely direct speech act and indirect speech act. Second, the sentence mode used is the imperative mode, the obligative mode, and the declarative-imperative mode. Third, the existing speech act function consists of imperative mode (order, appeal, prohibiting, and invitation/exclamation), obligative mode functions to require, and declarative-imperative mode functions to assert, remind, advise, propose/offer/suggest, governing, and threatening. The novelty of this research found that the expression of magical power on the walls of elementary school generally uses an indirect strategy. The strategy is expressed through a declarative sentence but has an imperative mode with the aim of smoothing the command to the reader. It is intended that the reader follows the command in the expression of magical power on the walls of elementary school.

Keywords

directive speech act, form, mode, function, magical power expression

Full Text:

PDF

References

Achsani, F. (2019). Aspek Moralitas dalam Anime Captain Tsubasa Melalui Penggunaan Tindak Tutur Asertif dan Ekspresif. Lingua: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 15(1), 23–35. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/lingua/article/view/16695.

Altikriti, S. F. (2011). Speech Act Analysis to Short Stories. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(6). https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.6.1374-1384.

Ardianto. (2013). Tundak Tutur Diraktif Guru dalam Wacana Interaksi Kelas Anak Tunarungu. Litera, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v12i01.1318.

Burnette, J., & Calude, A. S. (2022). Wake up New Zealand! Directives, politeness and stance in Twitter #Covid19NZ posts. Journal of Pragmatics, 196, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.05.002.

Dede, & Suryadi, M. (2019). Realisasi Bentuk Tindak Tutur Direktif Guru Bahasa Indonesia dalam Proses Pembelajaran. Jurnal KIBASP, 3(1), 115–124. https://doi.org/10.31539/kibasp.v3i1.963.

Dwi, L., & Zulaeha, I. (2017). Tindak Tutur Ekspresif Humanis dalam Interaksi Pembelajaran di SMA Negeri 1 Batang: Analisis Wacana Kelas. Seloka: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 6(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.15294/seloka.v6i2.17272.

Eliasa, E. I. (2014). Increasing Values of Teamwork and Responsibility of the Students through Games: Integrating Education Character in Lectures. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 196–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1415.

Faelani, N., & Setyowati, E. (2018). Tindak Tutur dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas VII SMP Negeri 2 Pacitan Tahun Pelajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Prakerta, 01(1), 54–62.

Fanani, A., Setiawan, S., Purwati, O., Maisarah, M., & Qoyyimah, U. (2020). Donald Trump’s Grammar of Persuasion in His Speech. Heliyon, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e03082

Faridah, S. (2017). Fungsi Pragmatis Tuturan Humor Madihin Banjar. Jurnal Kredo, 1(1), 91–105.. https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v1i1.1755.

Firman, Santoso, A., Dawud, & Saryono, D. (2016). Kontruksi Ideologi dalam Wacana Keagamaan Jaringan Islam Liberal (JIL). Litera, 15(1), 38–50. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v15i1.9764 .

Handayani, T. K. (2016). Nilai-Nilai Karakter dalam Tindak Tutur Ilokusi dalam Buku Wir Besuchen Eine Moschee. Litera, 15(2), 305–318.. https://doi.org/10.21831/ltr.v15i2.11831.

Inderasari, E., & Achsani, F. (2018). Styles of Repetition And Comparison Moral Message in Koplo Gener Dangdut Song. Jurnal Gramatika, 4(2), 325–339.. https://doi.org/10.22202/jg.2018.v4i2.2687.

Insani, E. N., & Sabardila, A. (2016). Tindak Tutur Perlokusi Guru dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Kelas XI SMK Negeri 1 Sawit Boyolali. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 17(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v17i2.2509.

Jazuli, A. (2019). Modus Kalimat Perintah dan Larangan dalam “Asbab Wurud Al-Hadits” Karya Imam Suyuthi Kajian Pragmatik. Jurnal CMES, XII(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.20961/cmes.12.1.34870.

John, P., Brooks, B., & Schriever, U. (2019). Speech acts in professional maritime discourse: A pragmatic risk analysis of bridge team communication directives and commissives in full-mission simulation. Journal of Pragmatics, 140, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2018.11.013

Kentary, A., Ngalim, A., & Prayitno, J. (2015). Tindak Tutur Ilokusi Guru Berlatar Belakang Budaya Jawa : Perspektif Gender. Jurnal Penelitian Humaniora, 16(1), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.23917/humaniora.v16i1.1522.

Kim, A., & Kwon, I. (2020). Hortatives, Imperatives, and The Directive Speech-Act Continuum: A Usage-Based Approach to The Korean -ca Hortative Construction. Lingua, 245, 102928. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2020.102928

Kurniati, W., & Tressyalina. (2019). Realisasi Tindak Tutur Langsung dalam Praktik Wawancara Tipe Serious Discussion Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia Universitas Negeri Padang. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 8(1), 220–227.

Mauri, C., & Sansò, A. (2012). The Reality Status of Directives and Its Coding Across Languages. Language Sciences, 34(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2011.08.002.

Mei-Ju, C., Chen-Hsin, Y., & Pin-Chen, H. (2014). The Beauty of Character Education on Preschool Children’s Parent-child Relationship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143, 527–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.431.

Murti, A. R., & Nurhuda, Z. (2019). Tindak Tutur Direktif dalam Novel Susah Sinyal Karya Ika Natassa & Ernest Prakasa (Kajian Pragmatik). Jurnal Sasindo UNPAM, 7(1), 71–93. https://doi.org/10.32493/sasindo.v7i1.70-93.

Nurkhalizah, S., Simpen, I. W., & Widarsini, N. P. N. (2020). Bentuk Tindak Tutur Ilokusi dalam Program Ini Talk Show NET TV. Humanis: Journal of Art and Humanities, 24(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.24843/JH.2020.v24.i01.p05.

Prayitno, J. H. (2009). Perilaku Tindak Tutur Berbahasa Pemimpin Dalam Wacana Rapat Dinas: Kajian Pragmatik Dengan Pendekatan Jender. Kajian Linguistik Sastra, 21(2), 132–146. https://doi.org/10.23917/kls.v21i2.4382.

Priyastuti, M. T. (2020). Tindak Tutur “Request” Bahasa Inggris dalam Metode Role Play pada Mahasiswa Keperawatan. Journal of Language and Health, 1(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.37287/jlh.v1i1.98 .

Rustono. (1999). Pokok-Pokok Pragmatik. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Santoso, J., Sabardila, A., & Wahyudi, A. B. (2019). Pemahaman Terhadap Ungkapan Hikmah sebagai Media Proses Pendidikan Akhlak. The 2nd International Conference on Language, Literature and Teaching, 2(1), 285–293.

Santoso, J., Sabardila, A., Wahyudi, A. B., Setiawaty, R., & Kusmanto, H. (2018). Membangun Karakter Siswa Sekolah Dasar Melalui Media Ungkapan Hikmah. Al-Islam dan Kemuhammadiyahan Multiprespektif, 65–75.

Santoso, J., Wahyudi, A. B., Sabardila, A., Setiawaty, R., & Kusmanto, H. (2019). Nilai Pendidikan Karakter pada Ungkapan Hikmah di Sekolah Dasar Se-Karesidenan Surakarta. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 9(1), 64–79. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v0i1.24931.

Setiawaty, R., Wahyudi, A. B., Santoso, J., Sabardila, A., & Kusmanto, H. (2018). Stiker Ungkapan Hikmah Sebagai Media Pemartabatan Karakter Anak Didik di Lingkungan Sekolah Muhammadiyah. Al-Islam dan Kemuhammadiyahan Multiprespektif-Islam, 177–188.

Sholiha, I., Sukarno, & Sukatman. (2020). Types And Functions of Directive Speech Act Used in Al- Qur ’ An Surah Al-Alaq. Jurnal Kata, 4(1), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.22216/kata.v4i1.5250

Sourou Koutchadé, I. (2017). Analysing Speech Acts in Buhari’s Address at the 71st Session of the UN General Assembly. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 6(3), 226.https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.3p.226.

Sudaryanto. (2015). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistik. Sanata Dharma Universitas Press.

Sulhan. (2019). Tindak Tutur Imperatif dalam Percakapan Sehari-Hari Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia Universitas Tadulako ( Kajian Pragmatik ). Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 4(3), 1–12.

Wijana, I. D. P. (1996). Dasar-Dasar Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.

Wijana, I. D.P & Muhammad R. 2011. Analisis Wacana Pragmatik kajian Teori dan Analisis. Surakarta: Yuma Pustaka.

Windiatmoko, D. U. (2016). Analisis Wacana dalam Gurindam XII dan Nilai Pendidikan Karakter serta Implikasinya sebagai Media Materi Ajar Sastra. Kembara: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 1(3), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v2i1.4016

Yule, G. (2006). Pragmatik. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 198 times | PDF view : 56 times

Refbacks

There are currently no refbacks.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Published by:

Department of Indonesian Language, Faculty of Languages and Literature, Universitas Negeri Makassar in cooperate with Asosiasi Dosen Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (ADOBSI) and Ikatan Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia (IKAPROBSI).

Address: Department of Indonesian Language Office, DG Building Second Floor, UNM Parangtambung, Daeng Tata Raya Street, Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia

Email: retorika@unm.ac.id