Quizziz Online Training Meningkatkan Kehalian Mendesain Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Computational Thinking

Fanny Herliyana Dewi(1*), Hani Sulsilah(2), Julia Edwina Hasbi(3), Asri Nur Lathifah Fauziyyah(4), Arief Muliandi(5), Tiastuti Putri Heryani(6), Taufik Ramlan Ramalis(7),

(1) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(2) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(3) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(4) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(5) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(6) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(7) Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/publikan.v13i2.31405

Abstract


Menghadapi kemajuan teknologi, pembelajaran hendaknya mampu mengajarkan Computational Thikinking sebagai salah satu keterampilan Abad 21. Dalam mengajarkan Computational thinking memerlukan peranan media pembelajaran yang interaktif. Sehingga tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk meningkatkan keterampilan guru dalam mendesain media pembelajaran berbasis computational thinking melalui pelatihan online Quizizz. Sampel pada penelitian ini 12 guru fisika (SMA dan SMP) dari berbagai provinsi di Indonesia. Untuk mengukur tingkat pemahaman guru tentang perancangan media dan computational thingking digunakan angket berupa daftar pernyataan yang dinilai dengan skala likert. Adapun hasil yang diperoleh setelah melaui Quizizz Online Training ini, 75% guru fisika menyatakan bahwa keahlian dalam memanfaatkan media elektronik yang dapat melatihkan Computational Thinking dalam pembelajaran fisika meningkat. Sehingga, melalui Quizziz Online Training mampu melatihkan keterampilan guru fisika dalam mendesain media pemeblajaran berbasis computational thinking.

Keywords


Computational Thikinking, Pembelajaran Interaktif, Media Pembelajaran, Quizizz

References


Boone, W. J., & Noltemeyer, A. (2017). Rasch analysis: A primer for school psychology researchers and practitioners. Cogent Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1416898

Cruz Castro, L., Shoaib, H., & Douglas, K. (2021). Computational Thinking Frameworks used in Computational Thinking Assessment in Higher Education. A Systematized Literature Review. July. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--36824

Durak, H. Y. (2020). The Effects of Using Different Tools in Programming Teaching of Secondary School Students on Engagement, Computational Thinking and Reflective Thinking Skills for Problem Solving. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25(1), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9391-y

Hutchins, N. M., Biswas, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, Á., Grover, S., Wolf, R., Blair, K. P., Chin, D., Conlin, L., Basu, S., & McElhaney, K. (2020). C2STEM: a System for Synergistic Learning of Physics and Computational Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09804-9

Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. (2015). Likert Scale: Explored and Explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(4), 396–403. https://doi.org/10.9734/bjast/2015/14975

Lai, R. P. Y. (2019). What underlies computational thinking: Exploring its cognitive mechanism and educational implications. Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Thinking Education, June, 204–208.

Mensan, T., Osman, K., & Majid, N. A. A. (2020). Development and Validation of Unplugged Activity of Computational Thinking in Science Module to Integrate Computational Thinking in Primary Science Education. Science Education International, 31(2), 142–149. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.2

Morelli, R., de Lanerolle, T., Lake, P., Limardo, N., Tamotsu, B., & Uche, C. (2011). Can Android App Inventor Bring Computational Thinking to K-12? Proc. 42nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE’11), January.

Ogegbo, A. A., & Ramnarain, U. (2021). A systematic review of computational thinking in science classrooms. Studies in Science Education, 00(00), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1963580

Purba, L. S. L. (2019). Peningkatan Konsentrasi Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Pemanfaatan Evaluasi Pembelajaran Quizizz Pada Mata Kuliah Kimia Fisika I. Jurnal Dinamika Pendidikan, 12(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.33541/jdp.v12i1.1028

Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147.

Wing, J. M. (2006). Computational Thinking. COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM, 49(3), 68-1-68–18. https://doi.org/10.1201/b16812-43

Yan mei, S., Yan Ju, S., & Adam, Z. (2019). Implementing Quizizz as Game Based Learning in the Arabic Classroom. European Journal of Social Science Education and Research, 5(1), 194–198. https://doi.org/10.2478/ejser-2018-0022

Yin, Y., Hadad, R., Tang, X., & Lin, Q. (2020). Correction to: Improving and Assessing Computational Thinking in Maker Activities: the Integration with Physics and Engineering Learning (Journal of Science Education and Technology, (2020), 29, 2, (189-214), 10.1007/s10956-019-09794-8). Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(2), 215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-020-09822-y


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 21 times |

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Copyright (c) 2023 Fanny Herliyana Dewi, Hani Sulsilah, Julia Edwina Hasbi, Asri Nur Lathifah Fauziyyah, Arief Muliandi, Tiastuti Putri Heryani, Taufik Ramlan Ramalis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publikasi Pendidikan : Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Pendidikan

ISSN 2548-6721 (online), ISSN 2088-2092 (print)
Email: [email protected]

Free counters!

 Creative Commons License
Publikasi Pendidikan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Publikasi Pendidikan : Jurnal Pemikiran, Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Bidang Pendidikan Indexed by