Practicality of ADOICARE Mathematics Learning Model in Developing Mathematical Creativity for Junior High School Students
(1) Makassar State University
(2) Makassar State University
(3) Makassar State University
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
Abstract. Advance organizer, Progressive Differentiation, Progressive Ordinate, integrative reconciliation, Creativity Deflopmen, Reflection, and Extention are mathematics learning syntax, hereinafter referred to as the ADOICARE learning model. This is the result of 3 years of research and development. Plomp's theory (1997) became a reference for development. The ADOICARE model draft that has been validated by experts was tested on 9 mathematics teachers of class VIII SMP in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi, which were divided into 3 groups. Each group teaches ADOICARE-based learning tools to 3 parallel classes. Data collection was carried out during the implementation process using observation sheets of learning implementation, student activities and student response questionnaires. The collected data were analyzed descriptively. Practicality criteria refer to Nieveen's (1999) theory. The results showed that the ADOICARE model-based mathematics learning tool was practically applied in the field.
Keywords: practicality, ADOICARE, mathematics learning
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Simonton DK 2003 Scientific creativity as constrained stochastic behavior: The integration of product, person, and process perspectives. Psychol. Bull. 129 475–94
Sternberg RJ 1999 Handbook of creativity (Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press)
Sternberg RJ 1999 A Propulsion Model of Types of Creative Contributions Rev. Gen. Psychol. 3 83–100
Mumford MD and Gustafson SB 1988 Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychol. Bull. 103 27–43
Skemp RR 1986 The psychology of learning mathematics (Harmondsworth: Penguin Books)
Solso RL, MacLin OH and MacLin MK 2008 Cognitive psychology (Boston, Mass .: Pearson / Allyn and Bacon)
Bruning RH, Schraw GJ, Ronning RR and Glover JA 1995 Cognitive psychology and instruction (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall)
Confrey J 1990 Chapter 1: A Review of the Research on Student Conceptions in Mathematics, Science, and Programming Rev. Res. Educ. 16 3–56
Slavin RE 2012 Educational psychology: theory and practice (Boston: Pearson)
Wertsch JV and Sohmer R 1995 Vygotsky on Learning and Development Hum. Dev. 38 332–7
Wertsch JV 1985 The Semiotic Mediation of Mental Life: LS Vygotsky and MM Bakhtin Semiotic Mediation (Elsevier) pp 49–71
Carin AA and Sund RB 1975 Teaching science through discovery (Columbus, Ohio: Merrill)
Costa AL and Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development 1985 Developing minds: a resource book for teaching thinking (Alexandria, Va: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development)
Fisher RJ 1990 The Social Psychology of Intergroup and International Conflict Resolution
De Bono E 1994 Teach your child how to think
Arikan EE 2017 Is There a Relationship between Creativity and Mathematical Creativity? J. Educ. Learn. 6 239
Nadjafikhah M and Yaftian N 2013 The Frontage of Creativity and Mathematical Creativity Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 90 344–50
Yaftian N 2015 The Outlook of the Mathematicians' Creative Processes Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 191 2519–25
Singh B 1988 Teaching-learning strategies and mathematical creativity (Delhi, India: Mittal Publications)
Tuli MR 1985 Abstract: Mathematical Creativity: Its Relationship to Aptitude for Achievement in and Attitude Towards Mathematics Among Bous J. Creat. Behav. 19 225–6
Plucker JA, Beghetto RA and Dow GT 2004 Why Isn't Creativity More Important to Educational Psychologists? Potentials, Pitfalls, and Future Directions in Creativity ResearchEduc. Psychol. 39 83–96
Alimuddin 2012 Creative Thinking Process of Prospective Teacher Students in Mathematical Problem Solving based on Gender (Surabaya: Surabaya State University)
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 132 times | PDF view : 16 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.