Implementation Learning of Art and Culture Based on 2013 Curriculum at SD Negeri 3 Amparita, Tellu Limpoe Sub-District, Sidrap Regency

Andi Ihsan(1*), Faisal Faisal(2),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


Abstract. This type of research is descriptive qualitative. The informants in this study were 2 teachers of cultural arts at SD Negeri 3 Amparita, the principal, teachers of other fields of study and several students. The data analysis of this study used qualitative analysis through three components, namely data reduction, data presentation and conclusion drawing. The results showed that: (a). The implementation of cultural arts learning is carried out in several stages including: the learning planning stage, the learning implementation stage and the assessment / evaluation stage for learning arts and culture. At the implementation stage of learning arts and culture includes: 1) implementing an effective learning approach or strategy; 2) utilize learning resources / media in learning, and 3) trigger and maintain student involvement in learning. Whereas at the learning assessment or evaluation stage, it includes: 1) the arts and culture teacher uses various strategies and assessment methods to monitor the progress and learning outcomes of students in achieving certain competencies as written in the lesson plan; 2) the arts and culture teacher designs evaluation tools to measure the progress and learning success of students; 3) cultural arts teachers take advantage of various assessment results to provide feedback for students about their learning progress. (b). The factors inhibiting and supporting the implementation of cultural arts learning at SD Negeri 3 Amparita are: a) Inhibiting factors, including: 1) lack of human resources (teachers) for arts and culture; and 2) limited facilities and infrastructure for learning arts and culture. b) Supporting factors, including: 1) principal leadership; 2) physical condition (health); 3) learning tools; 4) learning materials; 5) school climate; and 6) teacher motivation. The conclusion in this research is that the implementation of learning arts and culture at SD Negeri 3 Amparita has not run optimally due to several obstacles, including the lack of human resources (teachers) of arts and culture who are competent in their fields and limited facilities and infrastructure for learning arts and culture. 

 

Keywords: Learning, cultural arts, curriculum 13


Full Text:

PDF

References


Abdurrahman. (2007). kompetensi kepribadian guru. lampung: universitas lampung press.

Agus Tatang Sopandi, SP (2014). Laporan Penelitian Dosen Pemula.Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Proses Pembelajaran Seni Budaya Di Sd (Kajian Deskriptif Kualitatif Di Lingkungan Dinas Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Kab/Kota Bandung). Bandung: Universitas Terbuka.

Babbie, e. (2002). the basic of sicial research. usa: wadsworth group.

Borg, WR (1983). Education Research:An introduction. new york: Logman.

Emzir. (2007). Metodologi Penelitian pendidikan Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif (cetakan ke 6,januari 2012 ed.). Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Hergenhan, B. (2008). theories of learning. jakarta: kencana prenada media group. Joyce, BW (2004). Models Of Teaching.

Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.

M.Byrd, PR (1999). Methods For Effective Teaching. United States Of America: copyright A viacom company 160 Gould street Nedham heights, MA 02494.

Mansyur. (2015). Asesmen Pembelajaran di Sekolah. Yogyakarta: Student Library. Martiyono. (2012). Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Aswaja Pressindo.

Maulana, E. (2008). Model Tukar Belajar dalam Perspektif Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: ALFABETA.

Nieveen, N. (1999). Aproaches and Tools in Educational and Training. In Jan Van den Akker,JRM Branch, K.Gustafson, N. Nieveen & TJ.Plomp (eds).Desain Aproaches and Tools in Educational and Training. Nederlands: Dordrecth: Kluwer Acamdemic Publisher.

Nurdin. (2016). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.

O'neil, WF (2008). Ideologi-Ideologi Pendidikan (edisi Indonesia ed.). (OI Naomi, Trans.) santa Monica,California: Pustaka Pelajar,Yogyakarta.

Rusman. (2015). Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Jakarta: Rajawali

Press.

Rusman. (2009). Manajemen Kurikulum. Jakarta: rajawali press.

Sanjaya, W. (2010). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran:teori dan praktik pengembangan kurikulum. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sukardi. (2003). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan, Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: PT.Bumi Aksara.

Schunk, DH (2012). Learning Theories (translation edition). yogyakarta: pustaka pelajar

Sunardi. (2016). Sumber Belajar Penunjang PLPG 2016 Materi Pedagogik Bab IV Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: KEMENTERIAN PENDIDIKAN DAN KEBUDAYAAN DIREKTORAT JENDERAL GURU DAN TENAGA KEPENDIDIKAN.

Susan Mary Paige, AA (2017). The Learning Community Experience in Higher Education. New York: Routledge 711 Third Avenue.

Syah, M. (2010). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru. Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tilaar, H. (2012). Kaleidoskop Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: PT.Kompas Media Nusantara. Tilaar, H. (2004). Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Nasionl. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Wachowiak, F. (1993). Emphasis Art a Qualitative Art Program for Elementary and Middle School. University of Georgia.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 91 times | PDF view : 3 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.