Reconstruction of the Learning Paradigm: Future Studies

Syamsumarlin Taha(1*),

(1) Patria Artha University
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


Abstract. In fact, the reconstruction of the learning paradigm must indeed be carried out in a sustainable manner because the changing times are so fast and can leave the existing learning orientation. This is based on the fact that the aim of the non-existence of educational institutions is one of them to solve the problem of being left behind by humans with changes as a result of new knowledge. Therefore, this research aims to find out the current paradigm which can be used as a new paradigm in the learning system in Indonesia based on existing theories regarding the contextualization of changes in students' knowledge. In addition, this view is also based on the results of recent research on needs-oriented learning systems. The descriptive narrative qualitative method was chosen as the approach in this research with the inductive data analysis method. From the research conducted, the authors conclude that paradigm reconstruction is needed on aspects of learning methods and aspects of management of educational institutions or institutions that are more future-oriented. The orientation in question is a narrow pedagogic orientation towards a more critical pedagogic so that learning is always in context with life. Then ore crossed by educators, where educators are needed to carry out a review of the flow of learning they adhere to as well as student orientation, where in this orientation, students must be given an inability to develop themselves without dictation from the educator so that students can identify what their needs are.

 

Keywords: Reconstruction, learning paradigm

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adams., Betts, K., Matto, H., Lecroy., & Winston, C. (2009). Limitations of Evidence-Based Practice for Social Work Education: Journal of social work education; spring 2009; 45, 2; proquest sociology pg. 165

Adiwikarta, S. Sosiologi Pendidikan: Isyu Hipotesis TentangHubungan Pendidikan dengan Masyarakat. Jakarta: Departemen Pdan K, 1988

Bown, Lalage (2000). Lifelong learning: Ideas and achievements at the threshold of the twenty-first century. Compare; Oct 2000; 30, 3; ProQuest Research Library

Gallo, Carmine (2011). The Innovation Secrets of Steve Jobs. Insanely Different Principles to Breaktrough Success. New York: Mc. Grawhill.

Moll, Luis C. (1990). Vygotsky and Education. Instructional implications and applications of sociohistorical psychocology. Australia: Cambridge University Press.

Ornstein, Alan C., & Levine, Daniel L. (1984). An Introduction to the Foundations on Education. Boston: Hounghton Mifflin Company.

Pepperell, Robert (2009). Posthuman (kompleksitas dan kesadaran, manusia dan teknologi). Yogyakarta: Kreasi Wacana.

Reigeluth, Charles M (1983). Instructional Design- Theories and Models. An overview of their current status. London: LEA Publisher

Reigeluth, Charles M., & Carr-Chellman, Alison A,. (2009). Instructional Design- Theories and Models. Building a common knowledge base (3rd). New York and London: Routledge Tailor and Francis Publisher

Scrimshaw, Peter. (1993). Language, Classroom and Computers. London: Routledge.

Slavin, RE. (1995). Cooperative Learning: Theory, Research, And Practice.New York, 1995 Allen and Bacon, Smith, WA. (2001). Conscientizacao: Tujuan Pendidikan Paulo Freire.Yogjakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Tilaar, HAR, Membenahi Pendidikan Nasional.Jakarta: RinekaCipta, 2000.

Tilaar, HAR, Paradigma Baru Pendidikan Nasional.Jakarta:Rineka Cipta, 2000.

Webster-Wright, Ann (2009). “Reframing Professional Development Through Understanding Authentic Professional Learning” Journal of Education, June 2009 pg. 702-739


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 92 times | PDF view : 8 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.