The role of modern office administrative services in supporting public services in Bekasi Regency

Udaya Madjid(1), Ahmad Averus Toana(2), Muh. Ilham(3), Dahyar Daraba(4*),

(1) Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN), Indonesia
(2) Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN), Indonesia
(3) Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN), Indonesia
(4) Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri (IPDN), Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v13i2.56216

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the description of modern office administrative services in supporting public services. The research method used is descriptive qualitative, employing surveys to collect data from respondents who are members of the public who have interacted with office administrative personnel. The research results indicate that administrative personnel have a positive response to every member of the public seeking services, and they provide problem-solving solutions to visiting individuals, demonstrating a satisfactory level of satisfaction, although it is considered less important by the public. However, the services provided do not meet expectations. Therefore, there is a need for improvement in the availability of integrated information systems that connect internal units with external stakeholders and the provision of services based on Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) to satisfy the public. The services provided offer a satisfactory level of satisfaction but need to be maintained to avoid excess.


Keywords


Administrative Services; Public Services; modern offices

Full Text:

PDF

References


Boschken, H. L. (2017). Aligning a Multi-Government Network With Situational Context: Metropolitan Governance as an Organizational Systems Problem. American Review of Public Administration, 47(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074016668402

Brandsma, G. J. (2019). Transparency of EU informal trilogues through public feedback in the European Parliament: promise unfulfilled. Journal of European Public Policy, 26(10), 1464–1483. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2018.1528295

Caiden, G. E. (2014). Administrative reform comes of age. In Administrative Reform Comes of Age. de Gruyter.

Chehade, M. J., Yadav, L., Kopansky-Giles, D., Merolli, M., Palmer, E., Jayatilaka, A., & Slater, H. (2020). Innovations to improve access to musculoskeletal care. Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology, 34(5), 101559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.berh.2020.101559

Choi, D., & Berry, F. S. (2020). Can Infused Publicness Enhance Public Value Creation? Examining the Impact of Government Funding on the Performance of Social Enterprises in South Korea. American Review of Public Administration. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074020983253

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Farazmand, A., & Carter, R. (2004). Sound governance: Policy and administrative innovations. Greenwood Publishing Group.

Heidbreder, E. G. (2017). Strategies in multilevel policy implementation: moving beyond the limited focus on compliance. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(9), 1367–1384. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1314540

Hidayat, D. S., & Sensuse, D. I. (2022). Knowledge Management Model for Smart Campus in Indonesia. Data, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/data7010007

Ibn-mohammed, T., Mustapha, K. B., Godsell, J., Adamu, Z., Babatunde, K. A., Akintade, D. D., Manufacturing, W., Wmg, G., Cv, C., & Kingdom, U. (2021). Resources , Conservation & Recycling A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 164(May 2020), 105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169

Kelly, J. T., Collins, P. F., McCamley, J., Ball, L., Roberts, S., & Campbell, K. L. (2021). Digital disruption of dietetics: are we ready? Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 34(1), 134–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/jhn.12827

LAN. (2015). Modul Pelatihan Analis Kebijakan. Pusaka Lembaga Administrasi Negara RI, 11,12,15,54,186, 187,188.

Londral, A., Azevedo, S., Dias, P., Ramos, C., Santos, J., Martins, F., Silva, R., Semedo, H., Vital, C., Gualdino, A., Falcão, J., Lapão, L. V, Coelho, P., & Fragata, J. G. (2022). Developing and validating high-value patient digital follow-up services: a pilot study in cardiac surgery. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 680. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08073-4

Mensah, I. K. (2020). Impact of Government Capacity and E-Government Performance on the Adoption of E-Government Services. International Journal of Public Administration, 43(4), 303–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2019.1628059

Nukpezah, J. A. (2019). Opportunities for Collaboration and the Adoption of Local Government Investment Pools. International Journal of Public Administration, 42(10), 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2018.1520243

Osman, M. A., Mohd Noah, S. A., & Saad, S. (2022). Ontology-Based Knowledge Management Tools for Knowledge Sharing in Organization-A Review. IEEE Access, 10, 43267–43283. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3163758

Quible, Z. K. (2001). Administrative Office Management, An Introduction 7th Edition. Prentice Hall Inc.

Quible, Z. K. (2002). Administrative office management: An introduction. International Journal of Commerce and Management.

Sachan, A., Kumar, R., & Kumar, R. (2018). Examining the impact of e-government service process on user satisfaction. Journal of Global Operations and Strategic Sourcing, 11(3), 321–336. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGOSS-11-2017-0048

Schalk, J. (2017). Linking Stakeholder Involvement to Policy Performance: Nonlinear Effects in Dutch Local Government Policy Making. American Review of Public Administration, 47(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074015615435

Suknaisith, A., Wongwanich, S., & Piromsombat, C. (2014). Development of Teacher Performance in Educational Measurements and Evaluation through Self-monitoring Strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1683–1688. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.456

Sulea, C., Fine, S., Fischmann, G., Sava, F. A., & Dumitru, C. (2013). Abusive supervision and counterproductive work behaviors: The Moderating Effects of Personality. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(4), 196–200. https://doi.org/10.1027/1866-5888/a000097


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 156 times | PDF view : 25 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Udaya Madjid, Ahmad Averus Toana, Muh. Ilham, Dahyar Daraba

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Diterbitkan oleh:

Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar

 

JIAP Index By:

               

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.