How Dedication to The Inspectorate of Central Kalimantan Province Affects The Competence And Ethics Of Internal Government Supervisory Apparatus?

Marfengki Wanto(1*), Meitiana Meitiana(2), Luluk Tri Harinie(3),

(1) Faculty of Economics and Business Palangka Raya University, Indonesia
(2) Faculty of Economics and Business Palangka Raya University, Indonesia
(3) Faculty of Economics and Business Palangka Raya University, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v13i1.48568

Abstract


This research was conducted to analyze the influence of competence, commitment, and ethics variables on responsibility at the Inspectorate of Central Kalimantan Province. This research was designed to quantitatively use explanatory research methods with a causality approach design or a causal relationship between two variables. Following the research location at the Inspectorate of Central Kalimantan Province, the total population of employees serving as APIP is the Government Oversight Function (PPUPD) and Auditor Functional, who are directly involved in supervisory activities. The samples used in this study were all APIPs in the Inspectorate of Central Kalimantan Province, namely 64 people. The research instrument used in this study was a structured questionnaire equipped with alternative answers. The respondent only had to choose the alternative that best suited the respondent's experience, opinion, or feelings. Data analysis uses the help of SPSS and Smart PLS statistical analysis tools. The findings from this study are that the competence variable has a significant direct effect on commitment. The ethical variable has no significant impact on loyalty. Competence, ethics, and commitment have no significant effect on performance. Meanwhile, from the results of the indirect effect test, the commitment variable cannot mediate the influence of competence on performance. It is also unable to mediate the effect of ethics on performance.


Keywords


competence; commitment; performance; supervision; APIP.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adisono, M. T., Purwanto, M. Y. J., & Mulatsih, S. (2018). Strategi Pengelolaan Usaha Tani Pada Perkebunan Rakyat Di Kawasan Perbatasan Pulau Sebatik. Jurnal Agrica, 11(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.31289/agrica.v11i2.1754.g1656

Bosma, N., Hill, S., Ionescu-Somers, A., Kelley, D., Levie, J., & Tarnawa, A. (2020). GEM - Global entrepreneurshio monitor.

Caillier, J. G. (2014). Toward a better understanding of the relationship between transformational leadership, public service motivation, mission valence, and employee performance: A preliminary study. Public Personnel Management, 43(2), 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0091026014528478

Chan, S. C. H. (2019). Participative leadership and job satisfaction: The mediating role of work engagement and the moderating role of fun experienced at work. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 40(3), 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-06-2018-0215

Cnaan, R. a, & Cascio, T. a. (2015). Performance and Commitment: Issues in Management of Volunteers in Human Service Organizations. Journal of Social Service Research, 8376(November 2013), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1300/J079v24n03

Creswell, J. W. (1999). Mixed-method research: Introduction and application. In Handbook of educational policy (pp. 455–472). Elsevier.

Creswell, J. W. (2010). Mapping the developing landscape of mixed methods research. SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research, 2, 45–68.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.

Datche, E., & Mukulu, E. (2015). The effects of transformational leadership on employee engagement: A survey of civil service in Kenya. Issues in Business Management and Economics, 3(1), 9–16. http://www.journalissues.org/IBME/http://dx.doi.org/10.15739/IBME.2014.010

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., Childe, S. J., Papadopoulos, T., Hazen, B. T., & Roubaud, D. (2018). Examining top management commitment to TQM diffusion using institutional and upper echelon theories. International Journal of Production Research, 56(8), 2988–3006.

Edwards, G. (2017). Introduction to public administration. Library Press. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00216-1.x

Gonzalez, C., & Pelayo, E. J. U. (2022). The Mediating Effect of Leader Accountability on the Relationship between Transcendental Leadership of School Heads and Teacher Self-Efficacy. International Journal of Educational Administration, Management, and Leadership, 3(2), 83–104. https://doi.org/10.51629/ijeamal.v3i2.89

Haamann, T., & Basten, D. (2018). The role of information technology in bridging the knowing-doing gap: an exploratory case study on knowledge application. Journal of Knowledge Management.

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019a). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203

Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019b). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24.

Hair Jr, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM): An emerging tool in business research. European Business Review.

Hariandja, E. S., & Sartika, L. (2022). Effects of brand innovation and marketing dynamic capability on the performance of international hotels. Innovative Marketing, 18(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.21511/im.18(1).2022.06

Hattab, S., Wirawan, H., Salam, R., Daswati, D., & Niswaty, R. (2022). The effect of toxic leadership on turnover intention and counterproductive work behaviour in Indonesia public organisations. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 35(3), 317–333. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-06-2021-0142

Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments - a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0004-5

Ivankova, N. V, & Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mixed methods. Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction, 23, 135–161.

John W Creswell. (2013). Research Design Pendekatan Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Mixed (Tiga). Pustaka Pelajar.

Kassotaki, O. (2019). Explaining ambidextrous leadership in the aerospace and defense organizations. European Management Journal, 37(5), 552–563. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2019.04.001

Lee, M. C. C., Idris, M. A., & Tuckey, M. (2019). Supervisory coaching and performance feedback as mediators of the relationships between leadership styles, work engagement, and turnover intention. Human Resource Development International, 22(3), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2018.1530170

Lee, S. Y. (2008). Drivers for the participation of small and medium-sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives. Supply Chain Management, 13(3), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540810871235

Lo, K. (2018). How voluntary is poverty alleviation resettlement in China? Habitat International, 73, 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2018.01.002

Porter, L. W., Steers, R. M., Mowday, R. T., & Boulian, P. V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59(5), 603.

Rohs, M., & Ganz, M. (2015). International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning MOOCs and the Claim of Education for All : A Disillusion by Empirical Data. 16(6).

Seeck, H., & Parzefall, M. R. (2008). Employee agency: Challenges and opportunities for psychological contract theory. Personnel Review, 37(5), 473–489. https://doi.org/10.1108/00483480810891637

Sekaran, U. (2009). Research methods for business 4th edition. Hoboken. NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Shafritz, J. M., Russell, E. W., Borick, C. P., & Hyde, A. C. (2017). Introducing public administration. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.1080/00922013.1975.11000035

Silver, L., Lundahl, N., & Berggren, B. (2015). Revisiting control aversion: The role of financiers in connecting entrepreneurs to the marketplace. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(3), 417–432. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-04-2014-0064

Tavanti, M., & Tait, A. (2021). The Dark Side of Nonprofit Leadership: Cases, Causes, and Consequences. In S. M. Camgöz & Ö. T. Ekmekci (Eds.), Destructive Leadership and Management Hypocrisy (pp. 255–279). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-180-520211017

Yeh, C. H., Wang, Y. S., Hsu, J. W., & Lin, S. jeng. (2020). Predicting individuals’ digital autopreneurship: Does educational intervention matter? Journal of Business Research, 106(2), 35–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.08.020


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 115 times | PDF view : 19 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Marfengki Wanto, Meitiana Meitiana, Luluk Tri Harinie

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Diterbitkan oleh:

Program Studi Ilmu Administrasi Publik

Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar

 

JIAP Index By:

               

View My Stats

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.