The Role of Public Servants in Alleviating Poverty in Indonesia

Susilawati Susilawati

doi:10.26858/jiap.v12i2.45570

The Role of Public Servants in Alleviating Poverty in Indonesia

Susilawati Susilawati^(1*),

(1) Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi Bandung, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author

DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/jiap.v12i2.45570

Abstract

Poverty remains a persistent issue in Indonesia, and it requires the involvement of various actors, including public servants. This study aims to explore the role of public servants in alleviating poverty in Indonesia. To achieve this goal, a qualitative research method was employed, and data was collected through semi-structured interviews with public servants who work in poverty-alleviation programs. The study found that public servants play a crucial role in poverty reduction efforts by providing access to basic services, including health care and education, and implementing poverty-alleviation programs. However, there are several challenges that public servants face, such as limited resources and bureaucratic obstacles, which hinder their ability to deliver effective services. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of public servants in poverty reduction efforts and suggests the need for greater support and resources to enable public servants to deliver better services and improve the lives of people living in poverty.

Keywords

poverty alleviation; public servants; basic services

Full Text:

PDF

References

Alkire, S., & Seth, S. (2015). Multidimensional poverty reduction in India between 1999 and 2006: Where and how? World Development, 72, 93–108.

Baloch, M. A., Danish, Khan, S. U. D., & Ulucak, Z. Ş. (2020). Poverty and vulnerability of environmental degradation in Sub-Saharan African countries: what causes what? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 54, 143–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.04.007

Bandiera, O., Burgess, R., Das, N., Gulesci, S., Rasul, I., & Sulaiman, M. (2017). Labor markets and poverty in village economies. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(2), 811–870. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx003

Fang, D., Wang, D., & Kleit, A. N. (2020). How a choice between emission trading and tax schemes affects an environment-biased Environmental Protection Bureau’s discretion? Science of The Total Environment, 736, 139141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139141

Feliciano, D. (2019). A review on the contribution of crop diversification to Sustainable Development Goal 1 “No poverty” in different world regions. In Sustainable Development (Vol. 27, Issue 4, pp. 795–808). https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.1923

Gutmann, J., Padovano, F., & Voigt, S. (2020). Perception vs. experience: Explaining differences in corruption measures using microdata. European Journal of Political Economy, 65, 101925. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101925

Ho, S. Y. (2018). Finance-growth-poverty nexus: a re-assessment of the trickle-down hypothesis in China. Economic Change and Restructuring, 51(3), 221–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10644-017-9203-8

Ibn-mohammed, T., Mustapha, K. B., Godsell, J., Adamu, Z., Babatunde, K. A., Akintade, D. D., Manufacturing, W., Wmg, G., Cv, C., & Kingdom, U. (2021). Resources , Conservation & Recycling A critical analysis of the impacts of COVID-19 on the global economy and ecosystems and opportunities for circular economy strategies. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 164(May 2020), 105169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105169

Laurens, S., & Putra, A. H. P. K. (2020). Poverty alleviation efforts through MDG’s and economic resources in Indonesia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 755–767.

Li, L. (2019). Poverty alleviation through government-led e-commerce development in rural China: An activity theory perspective. In Information Systems Journal (Vol. 29, Issue 4, pp. 914–952). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12199

Mahadevan, R., & Hoang, V.-N. (2016). The nexus between poverty and deprivation in Vietnam. Journal of Policy Modeling, 38(2), 290–303.

Mishra, S. B., & Alok, S. (2022). Handbook of research methodology. Educreation publishing.

Miyamoto, M. (2020). Poverty reduction saves forests sustainably: Lessons for deforestation policies. World Development, 127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104746

O’Hara, P., & Sainato, V. A. (2015). Monetizing the police: Corruption vectors in agency-managed off-duty work. Policy and Society, 34(2), 151–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.05.002

Omerzel, D. G., & Gulev, R. E. (2011). Knowledge resources and competitive advantage. Managing Global Transitions, 9(4), 335.

Saleh, C. (2022). Implementasi Pembelajaran Secara Daring Di Sekolah Dasar Era Pandemi Covid-19. Spektrum Analisis Kebijakan Pendidikan, 10(4), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.21831/sakp.v10i4.17785

Santika, T. (2019). Heterogeneous impacts of community forestry on forest conservation and poverty alleviation: Evidence from Indonesia. People and Nature, 1(2), 204–219. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.25

Sareen, S. (2020). European energy poverty metrics: Scales, prospects and limits. Global Transitions, 2, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2020.01.003

Wu, Y., Ke, Y., Zhang, T., Liu, F., & Wang, J. (2018). Performance efficiency assessment of photovoltaic poverty alleviation projects in China: A three-phase data envelopment analysis model. Energy, 159, 599–610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.06.187

Xie, J., & Zhang, Y. (2020). Anti-corruption, government intervention, and corporate cash holdings: Evidence from China. Economic Systems, 44(1), 100745. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosys.2020.100745

Xu, M. (2021). Resources, Conservation & Recycling 2020 Excellence in Review Awards. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 167, 105425. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105425

Yang, Y. (2020). China’s poverty alleviation resettlement: Progress, problems and solutions. Habitat International, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2020.102135

Zhou, Y. (2019). Land consolidation boosting poverty alleviation in China: Theory and practice. Land Use Policy, 82, 339–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.12.024