EVALUASI IMPLEMENTASI PENILAIAN PEMBELAJARAN KELOMPOK PRODUKTIF DI SMK NEGERI 1 WATANSOPPENG

Nemiati Motondu(1*), Rusyadi Rusyadi(2),

(1) Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Fakultas Teknik Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


The study aims at describing the implementation of evaluation on productive group learning in SMKN 1 Watansoppeng based on antecedents component, transaction, and output. This study is the kind of evaluasi research using contenance stake model, which consists of antecedents, transaction, and output. The subjects of the study were teacher of productive learning group, class II students in fashion program at SMKN 1 Watansoppeng in Lalabata subdistrict of Soppeng district and industrial parties. Data was collected by conducting interview and documentation. Data was analyzed by employing descriptive qualitative and quantitative analysis. The results of the research shows that (a) the implementation of evaluation on productive group learning in SMKN 1 Watansoppeng based on antecedents component has been well planned, (b) the implementation of evaluation of productive group  learning in SMKN 1 Watansoppeng based on transaction component has been well planned, (c) the output component of productive learning in SMKN 1 Watansoppeng shows good result.

Keywords


Stake; Evaluation Program.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ali, S.M & Khaeruddin. 2012. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Makassar: Badan Penerbit UNM.

Amtu, O. 2014. Membenahi Pendidikan di Wilayah Kepulauan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Arikunto, S. 2009. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Arikunto, S. & Jabar, C.S.A. 2008. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan; Pedoman Teoritis Praktis Bagi Mahasiswa dan Praktisi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Akasara.

Bactiar, M. 2014. Evaluasi Implementasi Standar Penilaian Oleh Pendidik di SMA Negeri Watampone Kabupaten Bone. Tesis. PPs UNM

Bimtek. 2008. Struktur Kurikulum SMK. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan SMK.

Badan Standar Nasional Pendidikan (BNSP). 2007. Standar Umum Penilaian.

Brinkerhoff, Robert, O. 1986. Program Evaluation: A Practioner’s Guide For Triners and Educationer,Forth Edition. Boston: Keluwer Nijboff Publishing.

Denzin, Norman K. Yvonna S. Licoln. 2000. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd edition. London: Sage Publication, Inc, International Educational and Professional Publisher.

Depdikbud. 1996. Pedoman Teknis Pelaksanaan Prakerin SMK. Jakarta: Direktorat Pendidikan Menengah Kejuruan.

Djaali, Puji Mulyono dan Ramly. 2000. Pengukuran dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: PPs UNJ.

Enang, H. 2014. Analisis Kualitas Soal Seleksi Penerimaan Peserta Didik Baru di Kota Makassar. Tesis. PPs UNM.

Hamalik, Oemar. 2004. Proses Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hasan, H. 2009. Evaluasi Kurikulum. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Issac, Stephen and Wiliam B Michael. 1982. Handbook in Research and Evaluation. 2nd Edition. San Diego: California, Edits Publisher.

Jafar, Sitti Rusnah. 2013. Evaluasi pelaksanaan program prakerin Pada SMK Negeri 1 Marioriwawo Kabupaten Soppeng. Tesis. Tidak diterbitkan. PPs UNM.

Jihad, A. & Haris, A. 2013. Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo

Karatas, Hakan. 2013. Evaluation of English Curriculum at Yildiz Technical University Using CIPP Model. Vol 34 No 153. Egitim ve Bilim: Yildiz Technical University

Kufman, Roger, and Susan Thomas. 1980. Evaluation Without Fear. London.

Kurniawan, C. 2013. Studi Implementasi Standar Penilaian Pendidikan Oleh Guru Fisika Sma Di Kota Medan. UNIMED Press.

Kusaeri & Suprananto. 2012. Pengukuran dan Penilaan Pendidikan. Yokyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Mardapi, Djemari 2012. Pengukuran, Penilaian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Yokyakarta: Nuha Medika

Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. 1984. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods. Beverly Hills CA: Sage Publications.

Moedjiarto, 1997. “Peningkatan Mutu Lulusan Sekolah Teknologi Menengah Melalui Praktek Kerja Industri”. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Agustus. 1997. Jilid 4 Nomor 3.

Muliati, 2007. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Sistem Ganda; Suatu Penelitian Evaluatif berdasarkan Stake’s Countenance Model Mengenai Program Pendidikan Sistem Ganda pada SMK 4 Makassar. Disertasi: Universitas Negeri Jakarta.

Mutaqien, 1997. Kondisi Institusi Pasangan Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan Teknologi Dalam Pelaksanaan Praktek Kerja Industri di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. Tesis. Yogyakarta: IKIP Yogyakarta.

Nuraeni. 2014. Evaluasi Program Prakerin di SMK Negeri 5 Makassar. Tesis PPs UNM. Makassar: Tidak diterbitkan.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: Multi Kreasi Satudelapan.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2005 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan. Jakarta: BSNP.

Purwanto. 2011. Evaluasi Hasil Belajar. Yokyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Rasyid, H.& Mansur. 2007. Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Bandung: Wacana Prima.

Sanders, James R. 1994. The Program Evaluation Standars. 2nd Edition. Califonia: Sage Publication Inc.

Smith, Boonchutima & Pinyopornpanich Benjamaporn. 2012. Evaluation of Public Health Communication Performance by Stufflebeam’s CIPP Model: A Case Study of Thailand’S Department of Disease Control. Vol 19 No 1. Las Vegas: Proceedings of ASBBS.

Sudjana, D. 2006. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Luar Sekolah. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sudjana, N. 2012. Penilaian Hasil Proses Beljar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Tayibnapis, F.Y. 2008. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Jakarta: Multi Kreasi Satudelapan.

Wirawan. 2011. Evaluasi; Teori, Model, Standar, Aplikasi dan Profesi. Jakarta: Rajagrafindo Persada.

Yuksel, I. 2010. How to Conduct a Qualitative Program Evaluation in the Light of Eisner’s Educational Connoisseurship and Criticism Model. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, October 2010, 1(2). (http://www.tojqi.net/articles/TOJQI12/TOJQI 1(2) Article 6, Diakses 3 September 2014).


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1091 times | PDF view : 180 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.