Transformation of new public services in the perspective of responsive law in Indonesia
(1) Postgraduate, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
(2) Postgraduate, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/pdr.v7i2.60992
Abstract
This research discusses how public services have developed from time to time, until the age of new public services. This research answers what are the differences in public services from time to time, how is the application of new public services in Indonesia by taking a responsive legal perspective, with the issuance of (PERPRES) Number 95 of 2018 concerning Electronic-Based Government Systems which is a derivative of Law Number 25 of 2009 concerning Public Services signifies that new public services have been running in Indonesia and are also developing in regions in Indonesia.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alonazi, W. B. (2017). Exploring shared risks through public-private partnerships in public health programs: A mixed method. BMC Public Health, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4489-z
Birnbaum, D., Borycki, E., Karras, B. T., Denham, E., & Lacroix, P. (2015). Addressing public health informatics patient privacy concerns. Clinical Governance, 20(2), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1108/CGIJ-05-2015-0013
Brown, A., Fishenden, J., Thompson, M., & Venters, W. (2017). Appraising the impact and role of platform models and Government as a Platform (GaaP) in UK Government public service reform: Towards a Platform Assessment Framework (PAF). Government Information Quarterly, 34(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.03.003
Ciffolilli, A., Cutrini, E., & Pompili, M. (2019). Do European Funds support the formation of firms? New evidence from Italy. Regional Science Policy and Practice, 11(3), 549–569. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12205
Compton, M., Douglas, S., Fahy, L., Luetjens, J., ‘t Hart, P., & van Erp, J. (2022). New development: Walk on the bright side—what might we learn about public governance by studying its achievements? Public Money and Management, 42(1), 49–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2021.1975994
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2000). The new public service: Serving rather than steering. Public Administration Review, 60(6), 549–559. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-3352.00117
Denhardt, R. B., & Denhardt, J. V. (2003). The new public service: An approach to reform. International Review of Public Administration, 8(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2003.10805013
Denhardt, J. V, & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service: Serving, not steering. Routledge.
Iannone, P., Coclite, D., Fauci, A. J., Graziano, G., & Napoletano, A. M. (2017). Italian guidelines in accordance with the new National Guidelines System: Critical issues and perspectives. Recenti Progressi in Medicina, 108(9), 360–362. https://doi.org/10.1701/2745.27986
Koike, O. (2013). Institutionalizing performance management in Asia: Looking East or West? International Journal of Public Sector Management, 26(5), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-05-2013-0066
Kurniawan, N. B., Prayitno, D., Sembiring, J., & Yustianto, P. (2017). Public complaint service engineering based on good governance principles. International Conference on Research and Innovation in Information Systems, ICRIIS. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRIIS.2017.8002470
Mau, T. A. (2021). Branding the public service of Canada: A model worthy of emulation or unfulfilled promise? In Public Branding and Marketing: A Global Viewpoint (hal. 141–161). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70505-3_8
McNulty, T., & Ferlie, E. (2004). Process transformation: Limitations to radical organizational change within public service organizations. Organization Studies, 25(8), 1389–1412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604046349
Mojapelo, M., & Ngoepe, M. (2021). Contribution of Auditor-General South Africa to Records Management in the Public Sector in South Africa. New Review of Information Networking, 26(1–2), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614576.2019.1608573
Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158.
Ramírez, S. A. H. (2019). The new global governance in the aerospace industry: New technological capabilities in Brazil, China and Canada. Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, 2019-Octob. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85079165092&partnerID=40&md5=0b39c9fd50b9379e240264d5061dd26f
Saltman, R. B., & Duran, A. (2016). Governance, government, and the search for new provider models. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 5(1), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.198
Schröter, B., Matzdorf, B., Sattler, C., & Garcia Alarcon, G. (2015). Intermediaries to foster the implementation of innovative land management practice for ecosystem service provision - A new role for researchers. Ecosystem Services, 16, 192–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.10.007
Stoker, G. (2006). Public value management: A new narrative for networked governance? The American review of public administration, 36(1), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074005282583
Taylor-Gooby, P. (2006). The rational actor reform paradigm: delivering the goods but destroying public trust? European Journal of Social Quality, 6(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.3167/ejsq.2006.060207
Yakimets, V. N. (2017). New formats of public-state governance in Russia. In T. I.I., B. N.V., Z. V.P., B. N.V., S. L.V., & B. R.V. (Ed.), ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (hal. 257–264). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3143699.3143728
Yedder, M. Ben. (2013). Institutional responsibility: adapting CSR theory to public administration.
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 37 times | PDF view : 0 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Taufiqulhidayat Khair, Mulyanto Mulyanto