Knowledge Sharing in the Process of Financial Administration in Hasanuddin University

Muh. Agung Paturungi(1*), Otto R. Payangan(2), Hendragunawan S. Thayf(3),

(1) Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
(2) Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
(3) Universitas Hasanuddin, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author




DOI: https://doi.org/10.26858/pdr.v6i2.50968

Abstract


A challenge in knowledge sharing can also arise from a lack of understanding of the importance of knowledge and its advantages in enhancing organizational performance. Members of an organization may be less motivated to share knowledge if they are unaware of its significance and the benefits it can have on the company. To raise members of the organization's awareness of the importance of knowledge and its advantages, an effective communication strategy is required. What is the relationship between motivation (Mtv), information technology (Itc) and organizational climate (Ocl) on knowledge sharing (Ksh)? There are still few researchers who explore this question. The types of data that will be used in this study are qualitative data and quantitative data. The population and sample in this study were all employees of the Hasanuddin University Financial Administration Bureau. The analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that MTV, Itc, and Ocl had an effect on Ksh. Knowledge sharing activities within an organization can be influenced by a variety of factors, including motivation, information technology, and organizational climate. This understanding can be improved. High individual motivation can promote active involvement in knowledge sharing, and efficient information technology aids in knowledge exchange. On the other hand, an environment that is encouraging within an organization fosters a sense of comfort and motivation among its members to share knowledge.

 

A challenge in knowledge sharing can also arise from a lack of understanding of the importance of knowledge and its advantages in enhancing organizational performance. Members of an organization may be less motivated to share knowledge if they are unaware of its significance and the benefits it can have on the company. To raise members of the organization's awareness of the importance of knowledge and its advantages, an effective communication strategy is required. What is the relationship between motivation (Mtv), information technology (Itc) and organizational climate (Ocl) on knowledge sharing (Ksh)? There are still few researchers who explore this question. The types of data that will be used in this study are qualitative data and quantitative data. The population and sample in this study were all employees of the Hasanuddin University Financial Administration Bureau. The analysis technique used is multiple linear regression analysis. The results showed that MTV, Itc, and Ocl had an effect on Ksh. Knowledge sharing activities within an organization can be influenced by a variety of factors, including motivation, information technology, and organizational climate. This understanding can be improved. High individual motivation can promote active involvement in knowledge sharing, and efficient information technology aids in knowledge exchange. On the other hand, an environment that is encouraging within an organization fosters a sense of comfort and motivation among its members to share knowledge.

Keywords


Knowledge Sharing; Financial Administration; University

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akhavan, P., Hosseini, S. M., Abbasi, M., & Manteghi, M. (2015). Knowledge-sharing determinants, behaviors, and innovative work behaviors. Aslib Journal of Information Management, 67(5), 562–591. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJIM-02-2015-0018

Al-Dmour, H., Asfour, F., Al-Dmour, R., & Al-Dmour, A. (2020). Validation of the impact of marketing knowledge management on business performance via digital financial innovation as a mediating factor. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-05-2020-0085

Al-Tit, A. A., Al-Ayed, S., Alhammadi, A., Hunitie, M., Alsarayreh, A., & Albassam, W. (2022). The Impact of Employee Development Practices on Human Capital and Social Capital: The Mediating Contribution of Knowledge Management. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 8(4), 218. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc8040218

Blomkvist, K. (2012). Knowledge management in MNCs: the importance of subsidiary transfer performance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(6), 904–918. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211276182

Chen, L., Liu, Y., Hu, S., & Zhang, S. (2022). Perception of organizational politics and innovative behavior in the workplace: The roles of knowledge-sharing hostility and mindfulness. Journal of Business Research, 145, 268–276. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.006

Dóci, G., Rohracher, H., & Kordas, O. (2022). Knowledge management in transition management: The ripples of learning. Sustainable Cities and Society, 78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103621

Dodd, M. D. (2016). Intangible resource management: social capital theory development for public relations. Journal of Communication Management, 20(4), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCOM-12-2015-0095

Ferger, K., & Rechberg, I. D. W. (2022). Self-determination theory and its predictors for sharing knowledge: a critical review. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-01-2022-0030

Fioravanti, V. L. S., Stocker, F., & Macau, F. (2023). Knowledge transfer in technological innovation clusters. Innovation & Management Review, 20(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-12-2020-0176

Göhler, G.-F., Hattke, J., & Göbel, M. (2023). The mediating role of prosocial motivation in the context of knowledge sharing and self-determination theory. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(3), 545–565. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-05-2021-0376

Huang, M.-C., Chiu, Y.-P., & Lu, T.-C. (2013). Knowledge governance mechanisms and repatriate’s knowledge sharing: the mediating roles of motivation and opportunity. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(5), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-01-2013-0048

Kim, T. T., & Lee, G. (2013). Hospitality employee knowledge-sharing behaviors in the relationship between goal orientations and service innovative behavior. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 34, 324–337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2013.04.009

Kir, H., & Erdogan, N. (2021). A knowledge-intensive adaptive business process management framework. Information Systems, 95, 101639. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2020.101639

Kmieciak, R. (2021). Trust, knowledge sharing, and innovative work behavior: empirical evidence from Poland. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(5), 1832–1859. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-04-2020-0134

Malik, S. (2022). Emotional intelligence and innovative work behaviour in knowledge-intensive organizations: how tacit knowledge sharing acts as a mediator? VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 52(5), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1108/VJIKMS-09-2020-0158

Manfredi Latilla, V., Frattini, F., Messeni Petruzzelli, A., & Berner, M. (2018). Knowledge management, knowledge transfer and organizational performance in the arts and crafts industry: a literature review. Journal of Knowledge Management, 22(6), 1310–1331. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-08-2017-0367

Martín‐Pérez, V., Martín‐Cruz, N., & Estrada‐Vaquero, I. (2012). The influence of organizational design on knowledge transfer. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(3), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271211238742

Milton, N. (2015). Knowledge Management: Looking after the Know-How. In Re-Engineering Clinical Trials: Best Practices for Streamlining the Development Process (pp. 287–294). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420246-7.00025-6

Mubarok, E. S., Ronita, & Bandawati, E. (2021). Determinants of Employee Performance Mediated by Organizational Commitment. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 2(3), 186–200. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v2i3.280

Phung, V. D., Hawryszkiewycz, I., & Chandran, D. (2019). How knowledge sharing leads to innovative work behaviour. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(3), 277–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-11-2018-0148

Pian, Q. Y., Jin, H., & Li, H. (2019). Linking knowledge sharing to innovative behavior: the moderating role of collectivism. Journal of Knowledge Management, 23(8), 1652–1672. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-12-2018-0753

Sulaiman, S. (2021). Kecerdasan emosional dalam menciptakan hubungan kerja. In KINERJA KARYAWAN (ERA TRANSFORMASI DIGITAL) (pp. 87–100). CV. MEDIA SAINS INDONESIA.

Sulaiman, S. (2022). Perilaku Organisasi, Kelompok dan Kerja Sama Tim. In Psikologi Industri dan Organisasi (Konsep dan Implementasi) (1st ed., pp. 25–34). CV. MEDIA SAINS INDONESIA.

Sulaiman, S. (2023). Etika dan Moralitas Dalam Filosofi Bisnis. In Pemahaman Konsep, Tujuan, Dan Manfaatfilsafat Bisnis (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 155–169). WIDINA BHAKTI PERSADA BANDUNG.

Susanto, Y., & Rahayu, S. W. (2021). Strategy for Implementing the Bureaucratic Reform of The Regional Government of Bengkulu City. Ilomata International Journal of Management, 2(1), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.52728/ijjm.v2i1.210

Tang, J., & Martins, J. T. (2021). Intergenerational workplace knowledge sharing: challenges and new directions. Journal of Documentation, 77(3), 722–742. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-08-2020-0129

Tight, M. (2018). Human and Social Capital and Their Application in Higher Education Research (pp. 209–223). https://doi.org/10.1108/S2056-375220180000004013

Vandavasi, R. K. K., McConville, D. C., Uen, J.-F., & Yepuru, P. (2020). Knowledge sharing, shared leadership and innovative behaviour: a cross-level analysis. International Journal of Manpower, 41(8), 1221–1233. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-04-2019-0180

Wang, L., Song, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, L. (2021). How does contract completeness affect tacit knowledge acquisition? Journal of Knowledge Management, 25(5), 989–1005. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2020-0130

Wang, Z., & Wang, N. (2012). Knowledge sharing, innovation and firm performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(10), 8899–8908. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.02.017

Xiao, Y., Zhang, X., & Ordóñez de Pablos, P. (2017). How does individuals’ exchange orientation moderate the relationship between transformational leadership and knowledge sharing? Journal of Knowledge Management, 21(6), 1622–1639. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2017-0120

Yee, Y. M., Tan, C. L., & Thurasamy, R. (2019). Back to basics: building a knowledge management system. Strategic Direction, 35(2), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1108/SD-07-2018-0163


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 41 times | PDF view : 5 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Muh. Agung Paturungi, Otto R. Payangan, Hendragunawan S. Thayf