Democracy and Anarchy in Indonesia
(1) Departement of Sociology and Anthropology Education,Faculty of Social Science and Law, Universitas Negeri Makassar Makassar, South Sulawesi, Indonesia
(*) Corresponding Author
Abstract
This research delves into the intricate interplay between democracy and anarchy in the Indonesian context, shedding light on a subject that holds significant relevance in contemporary politics. Against a backdrop of political transitions and societal complexities in Indonesia, the study's primary objective is to comprehensively understand the dynamics of democracy and anarchy through a qualitative lens. Employing a qualitative research approach, the research engages various stakeholders, including political activists, experts, and the general public, to gather rich data on their perspectives and experiences. Data collection techniques encompass in-depth interviews, document analysis, and participant observation in key locations where democratic and anarchic events unfold. Thematic and content analyses are employed to extract and examine recurring themes and patterns in the data, ensuring the robustness and validity of the findings through triangulation. The study grapples with limitations such as time constraints and potential respondent bias but ultimately seeks to provide a nuanced understanding of the coexistence and interaction of democracy and anarchy in Indonesia. The research findings have the potential to offer valuable insights to policymakers and researchers concerned with political stability and governance in Indonesia, contributing to a deeper comprehension of the challenges and opportunities posed by these two seemingly contrasting forces in the nation's political landscape.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Acheampong, A. O., Opoku, E. E. O., & Dzator, J. (2022). Does democracy really improve environmental quality? Empirical contribution to the environmental politics debate. Energy Economics, 109, 105942. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2022.105942
Barro, R. J. (1999). Determinants of democracy. Journal of Political Economy, 107(S6), S158–S183.
Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage publications.
Darling, J. (2022). The politics of discretion: Authority and influence in asylum dispersal. Political Geography, 94, 102560. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102560
Feldman, D. L. (2017). The inspector general: Political culture and constraints on effective oversight. Public Integrity, 19(6), 593–606.
Feste, J., Ivens, B. S., & Pardo, C. (2020). Key account selection as a political process: Conceptual foundation and exploratory investigation. Industrial Marketing Management, 90, 417–434. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.07.024
Fossati, D., Aspinall, E., Muhtadi, B., & Warburton, E. (2020). Ideological representation in clientelistic democracies: The Indonesian case. Electoral Studies, 63, 102111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2019.102111
Fuad, A. B. B. (2014). Political Identity and Election in Indonesian Democracy: A Case Study in Karang Pandan Village – Malang, Indonesia. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 477–485. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.060
Gleick, P. H. (1989). Climate change and international politics: problems facing developing countries. Ambio, 333–339.
Hardin, R. (2008). Normative Methodology. The Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology, September, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199286546.003.0002
Juliawan, B. H. (2011). Street-level politics: labour protests in post-authoritarian Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 41(3), 349–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2011.582706
Latulippe, N., & Klenk, N. (2020). Making room and moving over: knowledge co-production, Indigenous knowledge sovereignty and the politics of global environmental change decision-making. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 7–14.
Mishra, S. B., & Alok, S. (2022). Handbook of research methodology. Educreation publishing.
Newton, K. (2001). Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. International Political Science Review, 22(2), 201–214.
Sinring, B., & Buana, A. P. (2022). Legal Politics of Sustainable Agricultural Empowerment in South Sulawesi for Community Welfare and Sustainable Development. Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR), 1(2), 38–48.
Slamti, F. (2020). 51 st International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development Development. 51st International Scientific Conference on Economic and Social Development, March, 286.
Smit, H., Muche, R., Ahlers, R., & van der Zaag, P. (2017). The Political Morphology of Drainage—How Gully Formation Links to State Formation in the Choke Mountains of Ethiopia. World Development, 98, 231–244. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.031
Soedarwo, V. S. D. (2014). Political Ideology Meaning and Patriarchal Ideology of Female Politicians in Indonesia: A Case in Malang. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 20, 486–495. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2014.03.061
Su, Y.-P. (2015). Anti-government protests in democracies: A test of institutional explanations. Comparative Politics, 47(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.5129/001041515814224444
Voitleithner, J. (2002). The National Forest Programme in the light of Austria’s law and political culture. Forest Policy and Economics, 4(4), 313–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00073-4
Wilfahrt, M. (2018). The politics of local government performance: Elite cohesion and cross-village constraints in decentralized Senegal. World Development, 103, 149–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.09.010
Yörük, E., Öker, İ., & Şarlak, L. (2019). Indigenous unrest and the contentious politics of social assistance in Mexico. World Development, 123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104618
Article Metrics
Abstract view : 68 times | PDF view : 35 timesRefbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Article copyright © to the Authors
Pinisi Journal of Art, Humanity, and Social Studies has been Indexed and Abstracted by:
Pinisi Journal of Art, Humanity, and Social Studies articles published by the Universitas Negeri Makassar, and have been peer-reviewed before publication. Read our Plagiarism Policy and the use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use.
the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.Website layout and design copyright © by Universitas Negeri Makassar