Teacher Explanation Strategies in Online EFL Classroom Interaction at Madrasah Aliyah

Sami’an Wulandari(1*), Maemuna Muhayyang(2), Iskandar Iskandar(3),

(1) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(2) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(3) Universitas Negeri Makassar
(*) Corresponding Author



Abstract


This research aimed to know the teacher explanation strategies in online EFL classroom interaction , the teachers way  of apply the strategies in giving explanation in online EFL classroom interaction and the reasons uses strategies in online EFL classroom interaction. The instrument uses observation, interview and documentation. There were three teacher at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Sinjai in the first semester participated in this research. Qualitative research design was considered as an appropriate approach as a type of research. This research found that (1) There were fivestrategies  used by teacher in giving explanation namely  (a) similarities and differences, (b) summarizing and note taking, (c) reinforcing effort and providing recognition,(d) homework and practice, (d) setting objectives and providing feedback, (e)  Nonlinguistic representation; (2) there were four ways used by teacher in giving explanation, that is saying greetings when starting the lesson, praying before starting and ending the lesson,  be intentional and Provide examples; and (3) the teacher reason for using explanation strategies in online EFL learning classroom interaction through whatsapp in general because  is an easy way to  explain the material through text so all students can read.

Keywords


Teacher explanation strategies; Online EFL classroom interaction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Oliveira, T. (2014a). MOOC’s business models: Turning black swans into gray swans. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Systems and Design of Communication (pp. 45– 49). New York, NY: ACM. doi:10.1145/2618168.2618175

Behr AL 1988. Exploring the lecture method: An empirical study. Studies in Higher Education, 13(2): 189–200.

Berliner, D. C. (1992). The nature of expertise in teaching. In F. K. Oser, A. Dick, & J. L. Patry (Eds.), Effective and responsible teaching: The new synthesis (pp. 227–248). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Brown, A. 1989. Models, standards, targets/goals and norms in pronunciation teaching. World Englishes 8, 2: 193–2000

Brown, H. D. (2000). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. San Fransisco: Longman.

Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching by Principle an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. San Francisco: Longman.

Chaudron, C. (1988). Second Language Classroom: Research on Teaching and Learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524469

Chin, C. 2006. Using self‐questioning to promote pupils' process skills thinking.

School Science Review, 87(321): 113–122.

Dr. Gogot Suharwoto (Plt. Kapusdatin Kemendikbud) :

https://www.timesindonesia.co.id/read/news/261667/pembelajaran-online-di-tengah-pandemi-covid19-tantangan-yang-mendewasakan

Ellis, R. (1990). Instructed second language acquisition: Learning in the classroom. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd

Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction - The Delphi Report. Berkeley, CA: California Academic Press.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. W. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications, student value edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill

Hansen, R. and Froelich, M. 1994. Defining technology and technological education: a crisis, or cause for celebration? International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 4(2), pp.179-207.

Leinhardt, G. (2010). Introduction: Explaining instructional explanations. In M.

K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 1–5). NY: Springer.

Leinhardt, G. (1987). Development of an expert explanation: An analysis of a sequence of subtraction lessons. Cognition and Instruction, 4, 225–282.

Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action?.

Alexandria, VA:ASCD.

Marzano, R. J., Pickering, D. J., & Pollock, E. J. (2001). Classroom instruction that works.Alexandria, VA: ASCD

Miles, M.B, and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis, 2nd Ed., p.10-12. Newbury Park, CA: Sage

Miles, M.B., and Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis, 16.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Mospan, N. (2018). Mobile teaching and learning English - A multinational perspective. Teaching English with Technology, 18(4), 105–125.

Mutambik, I. (2018). The Role of E-learning in Studying English as a Foreign Language in Saudi Arabia: Students’ and Teachers’ Perspectives. English Language Teaching, 11(5), 74. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v11n5p74

Nunan, David. 1992. Research Methods in Language Learning. Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press.

N Hativa, R Barak, E Simhi. The journal of higher education 72 (6), 699-729, 2001. 388, 2001. Teaching for effective learning in higher education

Richards, J. C. (2017). Teaching English through English: Proficiency, Pedagogy and Performance. RELC Journal, 48(1), 7–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688217690059

Siti Kiftiah, Teachers’ Strategies in Giving Explanation in EFL. English Education Study Program State University of Makassar, Indonesia Shahabadi, Mehdi Mehri, and Megha Uplane. 2015. ‘Synchronous and Asynchronous ELearning Styles and Academic Performance of e-Learners’.

Ulla, M. B., Perales, W. F., & Tarrayo, V. N. (2020). Integrating internet-based applications in english language teaching: Teacher practices in a thai university. Issues in Educational Research, 30(1), 365–378.

Wragg, E.C.,& Brown, G.(1993).Explaining. London:Routledge

Yousef, A. S. (2016). Using Classroom Interaction to Enhance Academie Writing. Sudan University of Sciences and Technology

Zabel, R.H., & Zabel, M.K. (1996). Classroom management in context: orchestrating positive learning environments. USA: Houghton Mifflin Company.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 84 times | PDF view : 25 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Article copyright © to the Authors

Pinisi Journal of Art, Humanity, and Social Studies has been Indexed and Abstracted by:

Pinisi Journal of Art, Humanity, and Social Studies articles published by the Universitas Negeri Makassar, and have been peer-reviewed before publication. Read our Plagiarism Policy and the use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Use.

This is a website that publishes an open-access article distributed under Licensed Creative Commons License Creative Commons License the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
 

Website layout and design copyright © by  Universitas Negeri Makassar